8,155
Life MemberLife Member
8,155

PostJun 03, 2014#201

^ thanks. That does ring a bell now and it looks like they were the same people proposing the Sky Wheel ferris wheel. It would be interesting to know whether there is renewed interest in residential on that site now.... apparently there is at least one more project under consideration in addition to the possible Drury tower.

The massing seems about right for that spot. I also can't remember if there are plans to update the aging parking garage next to the site. Anyway, It would be nice to get at least a couple hundred units down there in the coming years.... it certainly is possible.

933
Super MemberSuper Member
933

PostJun 03, 2014#202

The buildings could be a mere 5 stories and with just a handful of them, completely replace all lots there. With required ground-level retail and true urban form, they would form a perfect street wall. If one of the buildings were offices, labs, or classrooms, it would give people even more reason to live down there. Also, some of the current buildings need work.

8,155
Life MemberLife Member
8,155

PostJun 03, 2014#203

^ And don't forget the acre after acre available north of MLK for new construction. Could be a pretty neat transition from Arch to Old World Charm to Modern Mixed-Use to Old Warehouse District.

More I think about it, the less appealing a stadium down there is for me. Put the sucker across the river on Bloody Island.

388
Full MemberFull Member
388

PostJun 03, 2014#204

dredger wrote:^ Not only do I think marina would be cost prohibitive it will also have no demand whatsoever. Sorry, but there is reasons why most of the boating activity on the Mississippi is above Alton and the dam. Not too mention, the reasons why people go to the Lake of the Ozarks. As some one noted before, the river channelization has resulted in very strong, fast current on a river that rises up and down which is not friendly to small boats and can be very hazardous for those who don't know what they are doing.
I agree theres a reason and the more i thought about the barge traffic doesn't justify for that kind of activity downtown.. Both Laclede and Chouteau's landing share the same problem as they are shut off from the rest of downtown.. I think coffee shops bike accessibility anything mix used from mid rise to high-rise residential definitely more jobs better transit options such as a bus channeling people there if they are weary of crossing the roads or walking under the uninviting underpass or even enlivening the underpass with beautiful lighting displays....

5,704
Life MemberLife Member
5,704

PostJun 03, 2014#205

While both Chouteau and Laclede's Landing are shut off or sliced and diced, I do feel Laclede's can support mixed use and residential right now in which you can still as a pedestrian and or on a bike is very much accessible to Wash Ave/Downtown/Arch Grounds and vibrancy. Yes, you have to go under a freeway bridge but sill not impeneratable. I think Laclede is literally one announcement from taking off, just one commitment that says it isn't so bad. Hopefully it will be Drury sooner than later.

In the same breadth, just removing the raised section of I-70 downtown would be a huge transformation. That is the frustrating part is that this is such a no brainer and why City and Civic ladership and federal leadership for that matter is not telling everyone else to go pound sand because adding a couple minutes to travel time is not going to ruin the region's economy. The county is already doing a good job of that itself

I can definitely the envision the whole north riverfront re built. But, I also see it several decades out and the idea of a new open air stadium north of Laclede's doesn't bother me a bit, stadiums do come and go in time, and think it could be a short term catalyst to get Laclede's Landing as well as Bottleworks built out. To me, putting the stadium at the bottleworks site is a non-starter and just expands the convention space super block

9,541
Life MemberLife Member
9,541

PostJun 03, 2014#206

I havent been at the Landing since i was 22, so 6 years ago :D is it still mostly 21-23 age crowd?

219
Junior MemberJunior Member
219

PostJun 03, 2014#207

^More like 18-23. So im wondering this after hearing people throwing out plans for the landing. Shouldn't the focus be on completing the areas that have or had momentum to them? Like filling in all the gaps on wash ave and cbd. Then we would have a solid core of residents. There are still lots of empty store fronts on wash and CBD. After 14th wash ave is basically nothing at street level.(To about 21st) So these areas must still need more residents to fill up the retail. If we add a few 100 residents on the landing whats the point. Were just spreading the people out. It wont give downtown that "vibrant" feel. Focust on current residential areas Then once those are built up then lets move on to another section. Not half complete one then half complete the others

455
Full MemberFull Member
455

PostJun 04, 2014#208

Lots of people talk about the east riverfront like it'll always be a wasteland. Is that necessarily so? Is there something structural like awful flooding that will always keep it underdeveloped? I'm not an expert but I suspect that is not the case since there is a lot of industrial development there and a casino. I think at some point, they should think about opening it up for more development. With some dense development, it would be a nice place to live if one worked downtown. The park across the river from the arch is actually really nice and would make a good core for a state college overlooking the city. And this in turn could be the core for a small commercial area nearby. And this could finally be the core upon which East St. Louis pulls itself up. I wonder if one day in the far future, it'll be a site for massive development much like Pudong is to Shanghai. One day they decided that Shanghai was too crowded and turned swampland into a pretty nice skyline. But then again, in China, the leaders are now mostly economists, engineers, and scientists, and our leaders generally are not.

I think that east riverfront urbanization could be Metro East's version of Northside Regeneration. The state of Illinois and those counties could help contribute to developing their portion of our metro region.

8,155
Life MemberLife Member
8,155

PostJun 04, 2014#209

bigmclargehuge wrote: Shouldn't the focus be on completing the areas that have or had momentum to them? Like filling in all the gaps on wash ave and cbd. Then we would have a solid core of residents.... Focus on current residential areas Then once those are built up then lets move on to another section. Not half complete one then half complete the others
I see what you're saying but I don't really see it as a problem.... first the good news is that projects continue to proceed in Downtown and DW and I feel positive about more on the horizon.

Second, the potential Drury 30 story tower is at a spot that will definitely help Lower Washington and all of downtown. And aside from another unnamed potential project, there doesn't seem to be anything else in the works right now in the Landing so I really doubt any momentum would be taken away from projects across Third St. I think the historic riverfront district presents an opportunity to bring vibrant mixed-use to an untapped area and would be yet another option for residents to choose from. A number of modest infills rising up on the vacant lots over the course of the next few years along with a shiny new tower would be awesome and make larger scale projects north of MLK more viable in the future. IIRC, the total number of units envisioned in the TOD planning was in the 500-1,000 range .. I think that would be enough to make a successful and relevant riverfront district but its not going to happen overnight or on its own.... failure to plan and make the most of the investments that already are happening would threaten to set the district back even further.

Third, pretty much regardless of where it is downtown, we need more property owners moving forward and rebuilding the city.

2,037
Life MemberLife Member
2,037

PostJun 05, 2014#210

On East St. Louis, there is the fact that the sewers are in total disrepair and that the ground is soaked by chemicals from the Monsanto plant, Pfizer factory, incinerator etc.. Even if someone started to develop ESTL, it would take years to clean up the soil and water and rebuild the sewers and other infrastructure to the point that someone other than the poor souls stuck there would be willing to live there.

1,320
Veteran MemberVeteran Member
1,320

PostJun 05, 2014#211

The Landing has a lot going for it. I think we'll be hearing of residential historic renovation and possibly new construction in the coming year. The main thing that will facilitate these developments is a drive among current Landing interests to get rid of the economy-oriented drunk set and transition to a cool historic waterfront neighborhood.

I predict success.

8,155
Life MemberLife Member
8,155

PostJul 01, 2014#212

A new establishment called Marcell's Bar & Grill will be opening up soon in the old Trainwreck Saloon spot.

http://blogs.riverfronttimes.com/gutche ... anding.php

7,802
Life MemberLife Member
7,802

PostJul 22, 2014#213

Laclede's Landing group gets 3rd director in 4 months
http://www.stltoday.com/lifestyles/colu ... 07689.html

How bad are things if this is happening?

1,093
Expert MemberExpert Member
1,093

PostJul 22, 2014#214

When will the Downtown Partnership absorb the Landing's association?

5,704
Life MemberLife Member
5,704

PostJul 22, 2014#215

I'm curious how the association can sustain itself, Does the festival create enough revenues? Does the Casino write a nice check? What will be Drury's contribution and input now that they will develop the garage and have land banked on the landing.

4,553
Life MemberLife Member
4,553

PostJul 22, 2014#216

dweebe wrote:How bad are things if this is happening?
It doesn't seem as bad as it sounds. They needed a new director and they hired someone who quickly realized they weren't the right person for the job. That was definitely a misstep hiring someone who clearly wasn't adequately prepared or qualified for the position, but three directors in four months makes it sound like people are running for the door, but I don't think that's the case.

512
Senior MemberSenior Member
512

PostJul 22, 2014#217

dweebe wrote:How bad are things if this is happening?
Yeah, definitely not too bad. And really not that uncommon when replacing long-serving EDs. Much better to correct a hiring misstep early than muddle through and hope for the best, right?

I can speak generally to this, as I interned and then worked for the Laclede's Landing Merchants Association for two years. And have now worked as ED for another Chamber of Commerce for the past three years. Like most CoCs, LLMA receives membership dues from the businesses within its boundaries, plus some funding from a neighborhood Community Improvement District (basically, a taxing district) and occasional neighborhood/cultural improvement grants.

Out of deference/respect to the past and current staff/Board for LLMA (actually, now called the Laclede's Landing Neighborhood Association), I wouldn't dare go into any financials concerning the Big Muddy Blues Festival -- safe to say, though, that St. Louisans' propensity for "free events" is a burden which all local CoCs unfortunately continue to bear (if it were me, I'd have that event fenced off with "Suggested Donation" corrals at every possible entrance...).

I'm sure the leadership/memberhsip of LLMA (sorry, LLNA) is acutely aware of what the Landing needs and what it doesn't to improve/prosper. The cobblestone project was a start and City+Arch+River might help (though I still have serious concerns about the North Archgrounds/Washington Ave. plan). Next step needs to be quality infill (read: NOT a replacement garage), new business and new visitors.

7,802
Life MemberLife Member
7,802

PostJul 22, 2014#218

wabash wrote:
dweebe wrote:How bad are things if this is happening?
It doesn't seem as bad as it sounds. They needed a new director and they hired someone who quickly realized they weren't the right person for the job. That was definitely a misstep hiring someone who clearly wasn't adequately prepared or qualified for the position, but three directors in four months makes it sound like people are running for the door, but I don't think that's the case.
I hope so. Either it's bad luck or the new hires are seeing the books and/or horrible organizational dysfunction and heading for the hills as fast as possible.

1,982
Never Logs OffNever Logs Off
1,982

PostJul 25, 2014#219

I don't know anything about this particular situation, but the headline/statistic is SUPER misleading.

It makes you think a couple of hires quickly went south and bailed, when that's not he case at all. ONE hire didn't last.

A more accurate stat would be 3 directors in 6+ years, 2 in the last 4 months. The director that re-signed in March was there for 6 years according to her linked in profile. Then they hired a new one, that one didn't work out, and now they're onto another.

It's one misstep not two or three like the statistic would have you believe.

512
Senior MemberSenior Member
512

PostJul 25, 2014#220

^ Exactly. When you've had the same ED for as long as LLMA had, it's not that uncommon to course-correct soon after hiring a replacement...especially when you're not hiring/promoting from within.

The headline is somewhat misleading/loaded. If Holleman was working the political beat in 1841 when Tyler took office, his headline would've probably been "United States gets 3rd President in less than two months". :)

265
Full MemberFull Member
265

PostOct 31, 2014#221

I saw the the Sligo Steel being torn down done any one know what is up there? Also are they planning to redo the river front on the landing because one lane of Leonor K. blvd is block off?
Also the eads bridge metro-link work shifted to the other side now.

8,155
Life MemberLife Member
8,155

PostOct 31, 2014#222

^ good riddance! hello Rams stadium?

Work might be beginning on the north portion of the Central Riverfront Trail but I don't think it will begin in earnest until the south leg is completed.... I believe it is expected to be completed by next October.

1,190
Expert MemberExpert Member
1,190

PostOct 31, 2014#223

Also are they planning to redo the river front on the landing because one lane of Leonor K. blvd is block off?
The Riverfront project as part of CAR will continue all the way to Biddle St which is the street on the north side of the Sligo building. So that entire stretch of riverfront road will be redone.

3,762
Life MemberLife Member
3,762

PostOct 31, 2014#224

roger wyoming II wrote:^ good riddance! hello Rams stadium?

Work might be beginning on the north portion of the Central Riverfront Trail but I don't think it will begin in earnest until the south leg is completed.... I believe it is expected to be completed by next October.
more likely another parking lot for the casino. i don't think there's enough room there to build the new stadium without tearing down more stuff north of Sligo.

8,155
Life MemberLife Member
8,155

PostOct 31, 2014#225

^ looks like you're right.... there's a $500,000 permit for a parking lot. At least clearing out Sligo now will make eventual redevelopment easier.

Read more posts (1 remaining)