Tapatalk

Grand & Forest Park intersection

Grand & Forest Park intersection

432
Full MemberFull Member
432

PostApr 02, 2009#1

Burning question on my mind, as I encounter this often.







When making a left turn onto southbound Grand from westbound Forest Park, you see a green light, but when you make the turn you're immediately presented with a red light.



I will often see people suddenly stop right there (where the blue X is on the diagram), causing the driver behind them to have to immediately slam the brake to avoid a rear-end collision.



Are you supposed to stop here? Logic dictates that there's no room in the intersection for more than one car to stop, and there's no white line painted on the ground indicating you are to do so. However, logic often does not make it into street planning.

6,660
AdministratorAdministrator
6,660

PostApr 02, 2009#2

No, you should not stop. Treat it like an intersection with a median. Those lights are only for traffic on Grand that is stopped before the intersection. That is why those giant do not block intersection signs are in place.

53
New MemberNew Member
53

PostApr 02, 2009#3

I believe there is a sign that says "Do Not Block Intersection" which means that the red light does not apply to cars making the turn. So the correct thing to do is run the light.

5,631
Life MemberLife Member
5,631

PostApr 02, 2009#4

There is another downtown intersection that I was never sure about as well. Somewhere by the drive-thru Bank of America... I believe I take a right on Market somewhere and then an immediate left. But the predicament is exactly the same as what the OP suggests.



I suppose the confusion is brought upon by the fact that these are not traditional"X" intersections. There must be a way to make navigating through these intersections more intuitive.

432
Full MemberFull Member
432

PostApr 02, 2009#5

I'm glad then that I'm in the right for not stopping at this light.



The inspiration for this post was that last night I had someone in front of me at that intersection suddenly stop there, with their SUV somewhat crooked in the intersection. Part of me wondered if I was unjustified in laying on the horn when they slammed the brakes and left their vehicle sitting cockeyed until the light changed.



It looks like they have some polarized filters on the lights so left-turning traffic shouldn't be able to see it, but the unintended consequence is that once you've turned and are headed south you can see the lights and so people immediately think "oh crap I've got to stop." I see this happening more often since red light cameras were installed at that intersection.

1,099
Expert MemberExpert Member
1,099

PostApr 02, 2009#6

You're right for not stopping. Even veteran citizens like myself not 8 months ago get it wrong. I wonder if a giant "do not block the box" pavement paint scheme would help.

53
New MemberNew Member
53

PostApr 02, 2009#7

I have even seen cops stop. The sign is obviously not clear enough.

2,772
Life MemberLife Member
2,772

PostApr 03, 2009#8

innov8ion wrote:There is another downtown intersection that I was never sure about as well. Somewhere by the drive-thru Bank of America... I believe I take a right on Market somewhere and then an immediate left. But the predicament is exactly the same as what the OP suggests.



I suppose the confusion is brought upon by the fact that these are not traditional"X" intersections. There must be a way to make navigating through these intersections more intuitive.


I believe it is turning right on to Market from....11th street. You turn right and are immediately presented with a red light. I thought "too illogical for that to be ours" so I kept driving. My mom and dad caught up with us at the restaurant downtown a few minutes later and said "You ran that red light back there!!"

12K
Life MemberLife Member
12K

PostApr 03, 2009#9

The "Along for the Ride" guys in the Post covered the Forest Park/Grand question a few months ago. IIRC, they said you are, in fact, supposed to stop at the light after turning onto Grand.



Either way, it's a mess.

432
Full MemberFull Member
432

PostApr 03, 2009#10

Framer wrote:The "Along for the Ride" guys in the Post covered the Forest Park/Grand question a few months ago. IIRC, they said you are, in fact, supposed to stop at the light after turning onto Grand.



Either way, it's a mess.


It doesn't make sense why you should, though. Going back to the map, the red light would be to keep you from getting t-boned by people coming off of eastbound Forest Park.



However, if the light in question was red, eastbound traffic would have a green. Those drivers would be able to make a left turn onto northbound Grand, thereby t-boning the people turning left to go south (that then have to stop for that red light).

1,448
Super ModeratorSuper Moderator
1,448

PostApr 03, 2009#11

Framer wrote:The "Along for the Ride" guys in the Post covered the Forest Park/Grand question a few months ago. IIRC, they said you are, in fact, supposed to stop at the light after turning onto Grand.


Weird. It seems as if you're not supposed to stop. I never do, and as someone else pointed out, it seems as if the lights are filtered so as to not appear red to someone turning north from east-bound Forest Park. It's ridiculous to turn directly into a red light, especially when there's not really any room for cars to wait for the light to turn green.



In any event, that is the biggest clusterf*** intersection in the city. It really should be redone.



(Another odd thing I've noticed there: people leaving the Shell gas station on the NW corner will often try to head east on FP, but from the station it's technically only one way to the west, but there's no sign, and hilarity so often ensues.)

1,099
Expert MemberExpert Member
1,099

PostApr 03, 2009#12

Just pay attention to the stop bars and you'll notice there are none in the middle of the intersection. Just keep going, I think.

2,190
Life MemberLife Member
2,190

PostApr 03, 2009#13

The somewhat more important issue here is that said intersection has been a huge safety hazard for, well, decades -- and the City has never addressed the issue.

11K
Life MemberLife Member
11K

PostApr 03, 2009#14

I can't find a good example at the moment, but there's nothing entirely unique about this intersection - there are ones like it in many cities. It shouldn't be confusing, but I guess it is.

5,631
Life MemberLife Member
5,631

PostApr 03, 2009#15

People can be confused in other cities as well.

11K
Life MemberLife Member
11K

PostApr 04, 2009#16

I was sitting at this intersection yesterday (turning right onto Grand) and saw at least half a dozen cars turning left from FPP onto Grand and none of them stopped.

241
Junior MemberJunior Member
241

PostApr 06, 2009#17

I've stood by this argument for a long time: Turning left from Forest Park onto southbound Grand, you're simply passing the other traffic signal for Forest Park. So, to stop there would mean you are stopping in the middle of the same intersection!

Like someone mentioned before, the space between the two signals should be considered the same as a median, and there's definitely no need to stop on both sides of a median.

337
Full MemberFull Member
337

PostFeb 16, 2016#18

http://news.stlpublicradio.org/post/slu ... ign=buffer

SLU, city may work together to improve Midtown intersection
The city of St. Louis and Saint Louis University may team up to improve traffic flow at the intersection of Forest Park Parkway and Grand Boulevard in Midtown.

The process is in the very early stages, a SLU spokesman said, and there is no guarantee that changes would be made. The university would fund a traffic study and then work with the city and a consultant to come up with new designs for the intersection at the heart of SLU's campus...

472
Full MemberFull Member
472

PostFeb 16, 2016#19

Mound City wrote:http://news.stlpublicradio.org/post/slu ... ign=buffer

SLU, city may work together to improve Midtown intersection
The city of St. Louis and Saint Louis University may team up to improve traffic flow at the intersection of Forest Park Parkway and Grand Boulevard in Midtown.
When I first read that this morning, I was momentarily irritated by the use of "traffic flow" as if that's the problem.

1,864
Never Logs OffNever Logs Off
1,864

PostFeb 16, 2016#20

^Finally. This has been a major issue for SLU and Midtown forever. I hope we get an at grade intersection with some good, wide sidewalks.

472
Full MemberFull Member
472

PostFeb 16, 2016#21

New starbucks, new residence hall at Laclede with a surprisingly urban form, and then a new intersection at Forest Park Avenue.

This is a big deal, but it is amazing how much more would still need to happen to make a walk from the residence halls to the MetroLink not horrible. As anti-social and tasteless as SLU's fences and green-capped columns are, they're somehow better than that Shell station.

There are no street trees on Grand between Chouteau and what might be called "Pine." That is an incredible stretch of emptiness and pedestrians exposed to fast moving traffic.

1,864
Never Logs OffNever Logs Off
1,864

PostFeb 16, 2016#22

I believe I remember some rumors about SLU trying to purchase the Shell station in the past. What would they do with the land? Who knows. We'd probably see another green space and fountain for years.

9,525
Life MemberLife Member
9,525

PostFeb 17, 2016#23

Best case timeline

Study done by end of year
By March 4th 2017 apply for 80% fed funds at east west gateway (slu pays 20% match)
Get fed funds
design in 2018
Right of way in 2019
Construction 2020
Open 2021

16
New MemberNew Member
16

PostFeb 17, 2016#24

CarexCurator wrote:
Mound City wrote:http://news.stlpublicradio.org/post/slu ... ign=buffer

SLU, city may work together to improve Midtown intersection
The city of St. Louis and Saint Louis University may team up to improve traffic flow at the intersection of Forest Park Parkway and Grand Boulevard in Midtown.
When I first read that this morning, I was momentarily irritated by the use of "traffic flow" as if that's the problem.
I felt the same way when I read it. If "improve traffic flow"= "move more cars faster" then that is the last thing this intersection needs.

This last part was concerning: "She said although the intersection is surrounded by retail and the SLU campus, the ramps that run from Forest Park Parkway to Grand provide some room for expansion, depending on the design."

472
Full MemberFull Member
472

PostFeb 17, 2016#25

^Well sure, expand to the same size as Forest Park Parkway/Avenue to the west.

Gigantic streets can be great, but they need gigantic crosswalks and gigantic sidewalks. A street as wide as Market should not have sidewalks of the same width as Locust. Forest Park Avenue needs a huge promenade along it. In expectation of the eventual connecting of Market and Forest Park, we should just build the Gateway Mall's Hallway concept into Forest Park Avenue from Grand to Kingshighway and then across Kingshighway.

Wider than this though if possible...


Read more posts (38 remaining)