1,190
Expert MemberExpert Member
1,190

PostMar 30, 2012#226

I would bet that Starbucks and Chipotle haven't been told they were moving in there yet.

1,878
Never Logs OffNever Logs Off
1,878

PostMar 30, 2012#227

This thing looked so much better before it was painted:



Source

Hopefully Yackey's plans include stripping all the paint off and restoring the windows.

-RBB

1,218
Expert MemberExpert Member
1,218

PostApr 13, 2012#228

Update on STL Today:
The developers will preserve the round concrete roof and erect a mostly glass addition on the east side of the building to house Chipotle. Starbucks will use much of the original building, which will get new glass walls to reproduce the structure’s original see-through appearance. The businesses will seat about 100 people combined, plus 50 more on a patio beneath the saucer’s broad overhang. Starbucks will have a drive-thru window.



Read more: http://www.stltoday.com/business/local/ ... z1rvM78che

1,878
Never Logs OffNever Logs Off
1,878

PostApr 13, 2012#229

That's genuinely good news! I love this shot of the Saucer from an earlier STLToday story:



I hope they strip the paint off while they're at it...

-RBB

48
New MemberNew Member
48

PostMay 15, 2012#230

A friend ran into Rick and said that construction will begin next week. Should be open for business in September. That place is going to be a hit. Line out the door noon to 3 AM everyday.

2,386
Life MemberLife Member
2,386

PostMay 15, 2012#231

pat wrote:I would bet that Starbucks and Chipotle haven't been told they were moving in there yet.
Guess someone told them.

11K
Life MemberLife Member
11K

PostMay 15, 2012#232

Of all the coffee and burrito joints in all the flying saucers... (you know, Rick...)

36
New MemberNew Member
36

PostJul 07, 2012#233

Drove by today, and the place has been completely gutted! Just the northern brick wall standing about 2/3rds up and then steal beams and the saucer roof. I assume glass will fill the empty spaces. Can't wait as I drive by this almost everyday in the fall...

2,434
Life MemberLife Member
2,434

PostJul 07, 2012#234

Here's a pic I took from two days ago:

PostJul 11, 2012#235

The saucer is mentioned in today's New York Times:
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/07/11/reale ... wanted=all

11K
Life MemberLife Member
11K

PostJul 11, 2012#236

Rather than build anew, the developer Richard K. Yackey will begin a $1 million renovation this month on the property, which has 3,200 square feet of usable space. The roof, which is 12,000 square feet, will cost $100,000 to replace. When construction is complete next year, the station will house a Chipotle restaurant and a Starbucks and have a 1,300 square feet addition.

“If you do the math, it doesn’t make a lot of sense economically,” Mr. Yackey said, adding that constructing a building on the property would have provided him with more space to lease.
If you just "do the math", there's a whole lot of freakin' sh!t that doesn't make sense economically. But don't worry, Rick will still be making a lot of money on this development (and largely by using our tax dollars via historic tax credits).

2,434
Life MemberLife Member
2,434

PostJul 16, 2012#237

Here's the official rendering (sorry for the poor quality). This is on display at The Flats management office, so check it out!


11K
Life MemberLife Member
11K

PostJul 16, 2012#238

Here's the digital file sans logos:


2,434
Life MemberLife Member
2,434

PostJul 16, 2012#239

Thanks, Alex. I think the fluorescent lights on the underside of the overhang are a great accent to the building. It's a shame that they are apparently removing those altogether-- I would love to see some neon or LED lights in their place. Does anyone agree?

473
Full MemberFull Member
473

PostJul 16, 2012#240

Is that blue along the edge lighting or paint? Not sure if anyone knows.

I just hope it's not more SLU blue neon lighting. The stuff on Locust doesn't look so hot in my opinion. Nice idea, but blue isn't a good color for the flexible neon.

11K
Life MemberLife Member
11K

PostJul 16, 2012#241

^^ Agree stlgasm. I also don't like the blue. Maybe it's just me, but I think it's really hard on the eyes. Barnes-Jewish College of Nursing had the same blue up for some time and it was literally unreadable. The fleur-de-lis on the SLU building on S. Grand is really blurry for me too - though everything else is fine.

136
Junior MemberJunior Member
136

PostJul 16, 2012#242

stlgasm wrote:Thanks, Alex. I think the fluorescent lights on the underside of the overhang are a great accent to the building. It's a shame that they are apparently removing those altogether-- I would love to see some neon or LED lights in their place. Does anyone agree?
Disagree - I'm all about the clean look of the underside of the saucer.

It lends the saucer to be a fine balance between its mid-century modern roots and a 21st-century, contemporary design.

11K
Life MemberLife Member
11K

PostJul 16, 2012#243

I guess, and it looks good either way, but it was designed with lighting underneath:


722
Senior MemberSenior Member
722

PostJul 16, 2012#244

I agree with stlgasm, I liked the fluorescent lighting on the underside more and I hope maybe they change their minds to keep it.

That said I like the new SLU blue neon lighting too. I like it pretty much everywhere I've seen it, on Olive, Locust, Laclede, and on the Doisy building.

As long as, like Alex said, it's not used to make words, because it does tend to look blurry and difficult to read.

473
Full MemberFull Member
473

PostJul 16, 2012#245

I also don't like the blue. Maybe it's just me, but I think it's really hard on the eyes.
Yeah, it just vibrates and hurts the eyes, also the light it casts isn't very flattering. It gives everything a kind of spooky glow :lol:

I also like the lights underneath, I like the way they direct my eyes towards the center of the structure.

11K
Life MemberLife Member
11K

PostJul 17, 2012#246

^ I feel that there must be a pretty big segment of the population that can't stand the blue - like some sort of color blindness or something.

1,878
Never Logs OffNever Logs Off
1,878

PostJul 17, 2012#247

Oh, I don't know; I think a subtle blue glow cast on the rim by LED lights would look pretty cool. And it looks like the underside of the sauce will be lit by in-ground lights pointed upward based on that render - notice the spots of bright light near the pillars at the base.

If that's truly how it ends up, I'd be quite happy.

-RBB

12K
Life MemberLife Member
12K

PostJul 18, 2012#248

I'm with Geof on this one; I prefer the clean-look underside. And please no SLU Blue.

722
Senior MemberSenior Member
722

PostSep 19, 2012#249

The building is looking great; I drove by it today and noticed that the windows were being put in. It looks really cool.

1,878
Never Logs OffNever Logs Off
1,878

PostSep 20, 2012#250

Retweeted by Michael Allen yesterday:



Yessir, I like it.

-RBB

Read more posts (30 remaining)