2,687
Life MemberLife Member
2,687

PostJun 18, 2020#251

Hiberina in Dogtown by the same company took 2 years and 10 months from announcement to welcoming residents. There were times I thought the project stalled.

805
Super MemberSuper Member
805

PostJun 18, 2020#252

hebeters2 wrote:demo? We have been here before (rare photos)
I have barely opened the extensive rare photo collection that I have of the St. Louis region
Wow. Thanks for sharing those!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

PostJun 18, 2020#253

addxb2 wrote:Hiberina in Dogtown by the same company took 2 years and 10 months from announcement to welcoming residents. There were times I thought the project stalled.
They’re saying the project should be complete Q1 of 2022, but they had also anticipated breaking ground Q1 of 2020 originally...


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

sc4mayor
sc4mayor

PostJun 18, 2020#254

^ Well a Q2 (or even early Q3) 2020 start isn’t that much of a delay.  Especially compared to how long so many other projects in this town end up on the back burner.  Seems they could get this up within a year and a half to two years and still meet that opening date or maybe it gets pushed back a few months.  Who cares?  This is happening, the lot is closed, the strip mall has been vacated...things take time.  310 DeB across the street is the exception, not the rule.

12K
Life MemberLife Member
12K

PostJun 18, 2020#255

RIP Evelyn West. 

5,261
Life MemberLife Member
5,261

PostJun 19, 2020#256

Project goes to the Board of Adjustment on July 8th.
APPEAL #11381 – Appeal filed by Trivers, from the determination of the Building Commissioner in the denial of a building permit authorizing the Appellant to construct a mixed-use building, per plans, at 301-311 DeBaliviere Ave.
WARD 28 #AB-556042-20
ZONE: “H” – Area Commercial District
APPEAL #11382 – Appeal filed by Trivers, from the determination of the Building Commissioner in the denial of a building permit authorizing the Appellant to build new mixed-use building, per plans, at 5720 DeGiverville Ave.
WARD 28 #AB-556041-20 ZONE: “A” – Single-Family Dwelling District and
ZONE: “H” – Area Commercial District

13K
Life MemberLife Member
13K

PostJun 19, 2020#257

How was 301 denied? H zoning doesn't permit what's proposed? Stupid.

805
Super MemberSuper Member
805

PostJun 20, 2020#258

quincunx wrote:How was 301 denied? H zoning doesn't permit what's proposed? Stupid.
And why was it denied?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

13K
Life MemberLife Member
13K

PostJun 20, 2020#259

Because it didn't meet the H zoning code. Maybe the parking minimum?

1,864
Never Logs OffNever Logs Off
1,864

PostJun 20, 2020#260

I believe this is the standard procedure to get the required zoning changes - similar to all of the zoning denials that occurred in the Grove for the various proposed multifamily projects (on Hunt, Vista, Newstead, etc).  

13K
Life MemberLife Member
13K

PostJun 20, 2020#261

Right, you apply for the building permit, get denied due to zoning regs, then get a variance or get the zoning changed. The standard procedure is stupid.

1,864
Never Logs OffNever Logs Off
1,864

PostJun 20, 2020#262

I don't disagree with you there.  It's just a good reminder that many of these denials by the Building Commissioner aren't because they don't agree with the development plans, they're just limited by statute (or whatever the city law is).  The developers know going into things that these are the hoops that have to be jumped through and it's all planned out.

805
Super MemberSuper Member
805

PostJun 20, 2020#263

chaifetz10 wrote:I don't disagree with you there.  It's just a good reminder that many of these denials by the Building Commissioner aren't because they don't agree with the development plans, they're just limited by statute (or whatever the city law is).  The developers know going into things that these are the hoops that have to be jumped through and it's all planned out.
Ah, thanks for the clarification on this... what a waste of time and resources.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

13K
Life MemberLife Member
13K

PostJul 18, 2020#264

I suppose this is in anticipation of the construction fences going up.
DeB Ped Sign.jpg (190.33KiB)

466
Full MemberFull Member
466

PostJul 20, 2020#265

Uh oh.

227
Junior MemberJunior Member
227

PostJul 20, 2020#266

Stltoday - $92 million development near Forest Park Metrolink station hits roadblock as competitor pushes for parking

https://www.stltoday.com/business/local ... 1bb2f.html


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

805
Super MemberSuper Member
805

PostJul 20, 2020#267

tztag wrote:https://www.stltoday.com/business/local ... 1bb2f.html


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Oh Jesus Christ...


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

13K
Life MemberLife Member
13K

PostJul 20, 2020#268

So stupid. Are SLPS schools kids supposed to forego more tax base to satiate people's parking fetish?
We def dropped the ball on no following through on the FBC years ago. It had no parking mins.
Also what part of the Pearl development is in the 26th ward? It seemed they abandoned plans to acquire and develop the Metro parcel on the east side of DeBaliviere.

405
Full MemberFull Member
405

PostJul 20, 2020#269

I can't read the article, but wow.  What's worst case here?  Is this in real danger of being stopped/will they have to change the design?

1,864
Never Logs OffNever Logs Off
1,864

PostJul 20, 2020#270

Here's a link to read the full article, without needing a STL PD subscription: https://outline.com/LCPNz9

And Lux is definitely playing with fire.  It seems extremely petty for one developer to resurrect some neighborhood organization that's been dormant for decades just to try and kill their closest competition.  Best case scenario, they delay Pearl's project for some time, allowing them to open up first and get a jump start on leasing.  

2,687
Life MemberLife Member
2,687

PostJul 20, 2020#271

info@luxliving.co

If you’d like to remind them of the benefits of TOD, community led design process, or your opinion of their actions.

2,632
Life MemberLife Member
2,632

PostJul 20, 2020#272

So instead of new construction housing and high quality retail, Lux would like be across from a dingy and half vacant strip mall? If I was in the market for a rental I would pay extra for proximity to a development like that.

sc4mayor
sc4mayor

PostJul 20, 2020#273

^ It’s like cutting off your nose to spite your face.

1,864
Never Logs OffNever Logs Off
1,864

PostJul 20, 2020#274

If I had to guess as to what their strategy is, it would be one of three things: 

1) Cause enough delay to gain a competitive advantage in leasing.  If the other project is delayed by a year or two, then they get that much more time to be the only apartment building along that stretch.
2) Hope that they can somehow force Pearl to abandon the project and then someone acquire the land themselves.  
3) Gain some additional incentives or monetary concession through negotiating with the city and/or Pearl.

Lux certainly knows that an empty lot across the street from them won't be permanent.  They just want to be enough of a creaky wheel to get some form of grease.

4,553
Life MemberLife Member
4,553

PostJul 20, 2020#275

It's just surprising that Lux would take on the additional cost of these delay tactics. I guess they made a boatload on the sale of the TriBeCa building, but still, the margins on a project like 310 DeBaliviere can't be all that big - especially in the current economic environment. Just weird to take on thousands of dollars of additional lawyers fees, for what exactly? 

In addition to all of the valid arguments already put forth, if I were their construction loan lender I might call up and say "you guys focus on what you do best, building buildings and making sure you can pay me back, not picking potentially expensive fights with your neighbors that could cause political and popular backlash resulting in delays of your project cash flowing."

Read more posts (589 remaining)