Rumors of Peabody leaving Downtown! That would be a cool spot to make it residential-mix use tower! Coal is dying anyways. Bad part is it would be another empty huge building Downtown and we got way too many!!
JJ Taino wrote:Rumors of Peabody leaving Downtown! That would be a cool spot to make it residential-mix use tower! Coal is dying anyways. Bad part is it would be another empty huge building Downtown and we got way too many!!
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
If Peabody leaves and it sits vacant for any period of time, the tower should be bulldozed for the civic good.
Pretty certain that Peabody only has the top few floors, not the entire building. So while this is still a significant loss if it happens, it doesn't make the building vacant.
sc4mayor wrote:Yeah Peabody downtown is just a shell. That building’s landlord made a bunch of improvements to that building and lured some additional tenants.
It wouldn’t be anywhere close to vacant if Peabody left.
Do you know who the tenants are? Or is that private data? Just curious.
^Recommend you google search the building's address if you're interested. Or, head down and check out the corporate listing in the lobby. I knew some attorneys who worked there years ago. I remember Morgan Stanley taking over the marquee sign after they bought out Smith Barney, at the clock outside the building, as well as there being an insurance outfit on an upper floor. Yeah, lots of tenants there.
sc4mayor wrote:Yeah Peabody downtown is just a shell. That building’s landlord made a bunch of improvements to that building and lured some additional tenants.
It wouldn’t be anywhere close to vacant if Peabody left.
Do you know who the tenants are? Or is that private data? Just curious.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Obviously one of the tenants is Arcturis. They moved their street banners from where they used to be to around this building. I don’t remember which floor my buddy who works there said they are on though.
sc4mayor wrote:Yeah Peabody downtown is just a shell. That building’s landlord made a bunch of improvements to that building and lured some additional tenants.
It wouldn’t be anywhere close to vacant if Peabody left.
Do you know who the tenants are? Or is that private data? Just curious.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Obviously one of the tenants is Arcturis. They moved their street banners from where they used to be to around this building. I don’t remember which floor my buddy who works there said they are on though.
Thanks! I have to walk around the building to see the signs!
^ That may not be exhaustive - that's all I was able to verify with online presences. Tonkin & Mondl LLC (maritime lawyers) are also listed here, but I'm not sure that they're still there as their website is non-functional.
^ That may not be exhaustive - that's all I was able to verify with online presences. Tonkin & Mondl LLC (maritime lawyers) are also listed here, but I'm not sure that they're still there as their website is non-functional.
I wasn't sure where to put this but I thought it was interesting for the continued residential push going on in the city. Was talking to a family member about how his Arnold neighborhood association voted down a luxury apartment complex (for all of the reasons you'd expect). Also of note: I did a quick search and found another one in Imperial on Main Street that was voted down recently too.
Location: Arnold near Old Lemay Ferry Road and Seckman Road
100+ room luxury apartment building
Interesting to think about supply expanding only in the city if things like this continue to happen in the counties... silly, but probably good for the success of these new residential buildings going up.
It’s mostly crap like most everything they write. One thing that caught my eye is that they say DT residential vacancy rate is almost 25%. Can anyone verify that number? Denis, perhaps? I thought DT occupancy was more like 90-95%. I have a hard time believing that number. If the market sank that hard, that fast, I think we would have heard about it and I don’t think many of the new residential projects would be moving forward.
Numbers are correct! I’ve been trying to sell my property with no success! Whoever denies is lying to himself. Downtown only gets crowded for certain events and even during those events is only parts of Downtown. People go to games for 2-3 hours thats it. People drive straight to Union Station and other attractions. There’s shootings every other. Thank God most of the time people don’t die. Lately a few kids have been killed. Car and businesses break-in are rampant and you can see the boarded front stores. You do not see patrols in Downtown ever, I’ve seen maybe three or four in a year. The shell gas station on Tucker near Washington is a drug dealing market. Poelker Park is a shooting (drug use) between the homeless and the few drug dealers. Is there projects that have help our Downtown of course, is there future projects that can continue to help of course. But this administration doesn’t do anything to help the backbone of the city and lives in an false Utopia that only gets them votes. This admin is clueless and have no creativity on how to better our Downtown. Sad!
There are different services and definitions of Downtown. I'm looking at an industry standard data provider which specializes in apartments and they show 63 properties (6,900 units) between Chouteau & Cole, Interstate 44 & Jefferson. Overall occupancy is 88% with an average rent of $1.35 per square foot. This includes new properties leasing up (Ballpark Heights - 16% occupied, Front Page Lofts - 50% occupied) and "problem properties" (Mansion House, 415 units 65% occupied, this building alone is 6% of Downtown inventory). Some notable buildings: Cardinal Way - 90% occupied, Park Pacific - 92%, Pointe 400 - 93%, The Laurel - 97%, Gentry's Landing - 98%. Interestingly, Ely Walker is listed as 98% occupied. Data is only as good as reporting and the research, so no one knows for sure. So, comparisons are meaningful since reporting and errors are pretty similar across markets. Kansas City Downtown (Downtown core with Rivermarket and Crossroads) has 116 properties and 9,500 units with overall occupancy of 91 percent, and an average rent of $1.66 per square foot.
A lot of the St. Louis Downtown inventory are larger loft-style units, without many amenities built 15-20 years ago, or large even older traditional apartment buildings. The demand trend has shifted to smaller units with more amenities. So a lot of the inventory isn't competitive in the region regardless of the location. Also, with the talk of lack of attainable housing in the city, we have 820 vacant units available in Downtown with an average market rent of $1.35 per square foot, or say $1,350 for a 1,000 SF 2BD unit. According to HUD, this unit is affordable to households at 62% of area median income.
I'd also suggest that the new construction additions (1801 Wash Ave and Spruce St, BPV II) are filling a void for much needed updated housing Downtown. So much of the available product is loft style apartments, many which haven't been updated since the 90s and early 00s. AHM Group also seems to be proposing more housing diversity for Downtown West.
The fact that both Jeff Arms and Butler Brothers are under construction is huge. These additions, along with infrastructure upgrades and anchors, may help encourage new infill, retail additions, and absorption of existing units.
I'd also suggest that the new construction additions (1801 Wash Ave and Spruce St, BPV II) are filling a void for much needed updated housing Downtown. So much of the available product is loft style apartments, many which haven't been updated since the 90s and early 00s. AHM Group also seems to be proposing more housing diversity for Downtown West.
The fact that both Jeff Arms and Butler Brothers are under construction is huge. These additions, along with infrastructure upgrades and anchors, may help encourage new infill, retail additions, and absorption of existing units.
I think the new projects getting going right now probably reflects investor opinion on the downtown market too, they wouldn't pour cash into projects they think will lose money.