8,155
Life MemberLife Member
8,155

PostJan 19, 2014#101

In compiling 2014 projects, are things rather stalled on new downtown residential?
http://urbanstl.com/forum/viewtopic.php ... 20#p221795

The only projects I could identify as definitely coming online for 2014 were the OPO Tower, Millennium Center and Lacassian Lofts. A vacant Plaza Square building I think also may be turning into Senior housing called CitiParc at Pine. Not sure of the status of 1900 Pine.

The Chemical was supposed to start by now but appears delayed and I would think doubtful for '14. If construction commences soon on the Chemical and The Arcade moves forward then I think we'll be back on track, but a loss of either one of those would be big setback for continuing downtown population gains, especially since not much else appears to be in the pipeline (The Alverne with 87 planned units and maybe one or two other smallish projects, etc.) Am I missing anything?

933
Super MemberSuper Member
933

PostJan 19, 2014#102

I believe all of those will move forward this year and most of them will be under construction or starting construction. Many should open in 2015. More projects will likely be proposed between now and then. We just have to get these vacant properties occupied first now. Hopefully this will be the year they get funding for the Jefferson Arms building, too. And if the streetcar keeps moving forward, that's really going to encourage loads of new development.

8,155
Life MemberLife Member
8,155

PostJan 20, 2014#103

^ Man, if The Chemical and Arcade begin construction this year (as expected) and a redevelopment agreement is a go for Jefferson Arms 2014 will be a watershed year for downtown living. Few large-scale residential conversions would exist after that and if we were to continue the 500 or so new residents -- let alone build upon that to 600, 700, 1,000 - new construction will have to be the answer.

933
Super MemberSuper Member
933

PostJan 20, 2014#104

After these few, there really won't be any more of their size left. Maybe a few smaller ones like the old Bride's House building.

Also, what ever happened with the hotel proposal for 10th and Locust?

5,631
Life MemberLife Member
5,631

PostJan 21, 2014#105

Gateway City wrote:After these few, there really won't be any more of their size left. Maybe a few smaller ones like the old Bride's House building.

Also, what ever happened with the hotel proposal for 10th and Locust?
Wasn't that a projected developed by the two brothers that liquidated much of their holdings? I doubt it's happening at all.

933
Super MemberSuper Member
933

PostJan 21, 2014#106

The Roberts Bros. sold that and all their other properties to Urban Street. I remember Urban Street releasing renderings not too long ago for the hotel. I just don't know when they're going to do it. With the recent sale of the Roberts Hotel and the upcoming completion of Roberts Tower, hopefully they will soon get to work on the 10th and Locust hotel. It will be sad to see the two smaller buildings go. I also think they said they are renovating the building next to that as well, right?

With all of those, the Chemical, Arcade, Bride's House, Alverne, and the small one near SLU Law, that central area of Downtown is going to be bustling with new residents in 2015-16. Add all the new retail that will open as a result and I'm sure the neighborhood will be drastically different in two years.

8,155
Life MemberLife Member
8,155

PostJan 21, 2014#107

^ I don't think Urban Street has actually come out with a specific proposal for the 3 Locust St. properties although a bill was signed for a blighting study and tax abatement. I do wonder if hotel makes sense here as more supply will be coming online elsewhere in the immediate vicinity with the Mayfair being sold, renovated and upgraded to the Magnolia brand and the vacant Renaissance tower being purchased and new hotel to come. Reading b/w the lines, my guess is that UrbanStreet is prioritizing the Roberts Tower and theater before figuring out what makes sense for the other pieces.

btw, I'm not sure if Bride's House has a housing component (maybe top floor?) but it will still be nice to see it put back in action.

1,982
Never Logs OffNever Logs Off
1,982

PostJan 21, 2014#108

While it was feared the bill signing this past summer allowed it, there also has not been approval for the demolition of the two smaller buildings on and next to the corner. Still seemed very much 50/50 they'd actually get approval for that.

4,553
Life MemberLife Member
4,553

PostJan 21, 2014#109

roger wyoming II wrote:I do wonder if hotel makes sense here as more supply will be coming online elsewhere in the immediate vicinity
Couldn't agree more. Also, it's not in the immediate vicinity, but the Millenium Hotel complex is pretty purpose built to be a hotel/convention space, and will be sitting empty and in need of an operator soon.

PostJan 21, 2014#110

I love all the enthusiasm for new construction going on here. I also really like the Roberts Tower and the how it turned out. But there is a ton of inventory of old buildings that are either un-used or under-used that could be converted to residential in the coming years. I hope that residential conversions continue for years to come, as the office market is completely moribund. Here are a few examples of buildings that could be available for conversion after the current round of proposals are completed:


The office/retail/garage proposal for Municipal Courts seems to have stalled:




The building to the left of SLU Law:





8,155
Life MemberLife Member
8,155

PostJan 21, 2014#111

^ good post. A couple thoughts:

-- other large buildings like Union Trust and Railway Exchange could also have a residential component.
-- its a good reminder that there is a lot of need left for HTC -- hopefully the program won't be neutered.
-- I wouldn't discount office completely. Some of these buildings will see office again, especially from creatives who look for interesting space. See recent successes in smaller buildings like Bride's House & 312 Tucker as well as larger ones like Cupples 9 and Cannon Design's digs.
-- I came across this interesting article from 2011 in STLBJ that talks about how much vacancy was left in older buildings....
"Ghost buildings belie tale of downtown's progress"http://www.bizjournals.com/stlouis/prin ... l?page=all
Chemical, Arcade, Jefferson Arms and Cupples 7 and Cupples 9 were the ones specifically mentioned. Interesting how all but the Jefferson Arms have been accounted for one way or another since then. It would be nice to have an inventory of current "ghost buildings."
-- New construction will help solidify the notion that downtown has arrived. Again, I am very curious to see how well the Roberts Tower leases and what that may do for financing others. More old and new, please!

788
Super MemberSuper Member
788

PostJan 21, 2014#112

Yeah, there are certainly buildings that could be converted but the list is getting shorter. Before long you do have consider that it may be more attractive to build a new building close to amenities than convert an available isolated building. I do think that the Butler Brothers building is a bit on the outskirts but I would love to see it redone as residential. That building is amazing.

613
Senior MemberSenior Member
613

PostJan 24, 2014#113

flipz wrote:Yeah, there are certainly buildings that could be converted but the list is getting shorter. Before long you do have consider that it may be more attractive to build a new building close to amenities than convert an available isolated building. I do think that the Butler Brothers building is a bit on the outskirts but I would love to see it redone as residential. That building is amazing.
Agreed. I love the Butler Bros building and it has great potential. I would assume the struggle with starting any project there is the sheer enormity of the building.

8,155
Life MemberLife Member
8,155

PostJan 24, 2014#114

^ Butler is which one?

788
Super MemberSuper Member
788

PostJan 24, 2014#115

roger wyoming II wrote:^ Butler is which one?
8th one down, right after SLU Law.
It is at Olive and 18th.

http://www.builtstlouis.net/central-cor ... ing01.html

8,155
Life MemberLife Member
8,155

PostJan 24, 2014#116

^ thanks much, very sweet building! Hopefully it is in relatively good shape.... if so its day will come.

933
Super MemberSuper Member
933

PostJan 25, 2014#117

I thought the building next to SLU Law was a Contegix data center.

1
New MemberNew Member
1

PostJan 25, 2014#118

^ That is correct. We house our servers at Cybercon which is located there as well.

Glad I found this board, a wealth of STL info.

8,155
Life MemberLife Member
8,155

PostJan 25, 2014#119

^ welcome! hope to see you around on the beer thread, btw!

933
Super MemberSuper Member
933

PostFeb 04, 2014#120

I believe the original version of this list was posted by Arch City on skyscraperpage.com. I have added onto it, but I am including developments outside of Downtown:

-LaClede Lofts Apartments, Universatile/Rothschild Development, 50-luxury units (under construction)
-Metropolitan Artists Lofts, Dominion Properties, 72-live/work units (completed)
-The Gotham and Gotham Annex, St. Louis Design Alliance, 84-units (completed)
-West End City Apartments, Village Green Properties, 88-units (under construction)
-City Walk Apartments, Mills Properties, 177-units (under construction)
-Lindell @ Euclid, Opus Group, 217-units (spring groundbreaking?)
-3949 Lindell (post-fire reconstruction), Education Realty Trust, 197-units (completed August 2013)
-Aventura @ Forest Park, MLP, 200-units (Phase II under construction)
-North Sarah Apartments, McCormack Baron Salazar, 223-units (Phase II under construction)
-West Pine Lofts, Hallmark Communities, 260-units (proposed)
-The Lofts of Washington University, Delmar Loop, 265-units (under construction)
-Cortona @ Forest Park, Balke-Brown Transwestern, 276-units (under construction)
-A proposed $9-million, low-rise apartment building, The Grove/Manchester strip, 55 units (proposed)
-Missouri Theatre Building being redeveloped into apartments, Grand Center, 108 units (proposed)
-Arcade Building, Downtown, 250 units (proposed)
-Chemical Building, Downtown, 120 units (proposed)
-Roberts Tower, Downtown, 132 units (opening spring 2014)
-Millenium Center, Downtown, 102 units, (proposed)
-Alverne, Downtown, 81 apartments (proposed)
-Butler Bros. Building, Downtown, 342 units (proposed)
-Crossing in Clayton, 255 luxury apartments, (groundbreaking spring 2014)

TOTAL:
3,638 units

Not sure how many units these will have:

-Drury Tower, 30 stories, Laclede's Landing (proposed)
-Montgomery Bank Tower, 30 stories, Clayton (proposed)

If you figure most units will have multiple people living in them, let's say the average is 2, then that brings the total to over 7,000 more residents, not including the Drury or Montgomery Towers, all by about 2016...PLUS whatever new developments come about before then as well. I am also forgetting a few on this list. On top of that, this only includes Central Corridor developments, not anywhere else.

Anyways, the Central Corridor is blowing up right now with residential development and the momentum will only keep on snowballing! With this, the various college expansions, BJC expansion, retail (IKEA) and entertainment (BPV) projects drawing extra people to the area from out of town, etc., you can bet that the Central Corridor of 2020 will be insane! With all of this, plus whatever else is proposed over the next six years, we're really setting ourselves up for one hell of a St. Louis! We're on the edge right now. This is a very important time for our City. This is where we prove we can achieve liftoff.

190
Junior MemberJunior Member
190

PostFeb 05, 2014#121

Does anyone have data on the vacancy rate/number of condos available for rent in downtown STL. I'm curious about how the for-rent-by-owner numbers compare with the multifamily developments in the CBD.

8,155
Life MemberLife Member
8,155

PostFeb 07, 2014#122

Gateway City wrote:I believe the original version of this list was posted by Arch City on skyscraperpage.com. I have added onto it, but I am including developments outside of Downtown:

-LaClede Lofts Apartments, Universatile/Rothschild Development, 50-luxury units (under construction)
-Metropolitan Artists Lofts, Dominion Properties, 72-live/work units (completed)
-The Gotham and Gotham Annex, St. Louis Design Alliance, 84-units (completed)
-West End City Apartments, Village Green Properties, 88-units (under construction)
-City Walk Apartments, Mills Properties, 177-units (under construction)
-Lindell @ Euclid, Opus Group, 217-units (spring groundbreaking?)
-3949 Lindell (post-fire reconstruction), Education Realty Trust, 197-units (completed August 2013)
-Aventura @ Forest Park, MLP, 200-units (Phase II under construction)
-North Sarah Apartments, McCormack Baron Salazar, 223-units (Phase II under construction)
-West Pine Lofts, Hallmark Communities, 260-units (proposed)
-The Lofts of Washington University, Delmar Loop, 265-units (under construction)
-Cortona @ Forest Park, Balke-Brown Transwestern, 276-units (under construction)
-A proposed $9-million, low-rise apartment building, The Grove/Manchester strip, 55 units (proposed)
-Missouri Theatre Building being redeveloped into apartments, Grand Center, 108 units (proposed)
-Arcade Building, Downtown, 250 units (proposed)
-Chemical Building, Downtown, 120 units (proposed)
-Roberts Tower, Downtown, 132 units (opening spring 2014)
-Millenium Center, Downtown, 102 units, (proposed)
-Alverne, Downtown, 81 apartments (proposed)
-Butler Bros. Building, Downtown, 342 units (proposed)
-Crossing in Clayton, 255 luxury apartments, (groundbreaking spring 2014)

TOTAL:
3,638 units

Not sure how many units these will have:

-Drury Tower, 30 stories, Laclede's Landing (proposed)
-Montgomery Bank Tower, 30 stories, Clayton (proposed)

If you figure most units will have multiple people living in them, let's say the average is 2, then that brings the total to over 7,000 more residents, not including the Drury or Montgomery Towers, all by about 2016...PLUS whatever new developments come about before then as well. I am also forgetting a few on this list. On top of that, this only includes Central Corridor developments, not anywhere else.

Anyways, the Central Corridor is blowing up right now with residential development and the momentum will only keep on snowballing! With this, the various college expansions, BJC expansion, retail (IKEA) and entertainment (BPV) projects drawing extra people to the area from out of town, etc., you can bet that the Central Corridor of 2020 will be insane! With all of this, plus whatever else is proposed over the next six years, we're really setting ourselves up for one hell of a St. Louis! We're on the edge right now. This is a very important time for our City. This is where we prove we can achieve liftoff.
I sure would like to read some good news on Arcade and Chemical getting started soon.... those are key to unlocking the potential of OPO and Olive as a vibrant core of downtown.

PostFeb 07, 2014#123

Here is a pretty sweet residential conversion of KC's downtown Folger's Coffee Plant that closed in '12:
http://www.bizjournals.com/kansascity/n ... 2014-02-06

It will be a mix of studios on up to 3 bedrooms. It also looks like the standards tax abatement package there is 100% for 10 years and 50% for another 15 years.... that's 25 years! I don't think we go that far.

I suppose one day the Tums plant will close across from Busch.... hopefully there will be a quick conversion to residential as with the Folgers. Actually it would be pretty cool if somehow Tums could be relocated to N. RIverfront and mixed-use took over.

933
Super MemberSuper Member
933

PostFeb 07, 2014#124

roger wyoming II wrote: I sure would like to read some good news on Arcade and Chemical getting started soon.... those are key to unlocking the potential of OPO and Olive as a vibrant core of downtown.
They're going to have to, especially as the streetcar comes closer to reality.

Also, if we're ever going to get more people Downtown, then the best way to funnel thousands of people down there would be through the N-S MetroLink! How is that MoDOT can spend loads of money on rural "highways" every year but can't spend less than a quarter of that on our new Metro line? It's Missouri Department of Transportation, not Missouri Department of Highways. "Transportation" can include light-rail and streetcar. What, people don't want tax money from other parts of the state to be spent on a light-rail only St. Louis will benefit from? Well, what if I don't want my own tax money being spent on bullsh*t projects on highways in the middle of nowhere that practically nobody will ever actually benefit from? They waste money on building that crap in small towns who's entire county has less residents than just North or South St. Louis do alone.

If they just put forth 1/3, or even 1/4 of the money needed for the N-S line, it would hardly make a dent in their budget. Then we could get the City and federal grants for the rest of it. Is it really so much to ask? Or do they still feel it's necessary to keep adding lanes onto already under-used highways in counties with less than 200,000 residents? That isn't doing jack sh*t to help anyone. A N-S MetroLink would be used more than those and if they only paid for part of it, with the rest of the cost being matched by city and federal money, it would cost about the same as those other garbage highway projects they pour money into. But no, light-rail and streetcars aren't real transportation in their eyes.

This is what will keep St. Louis behind. If this N-S line ran through Downtown, it would spur insane amounts of development and serve almost as many people as the red line, if not the same amount. The Chemical and Arcade would be even more incredibly attractive living options if that were the case.

592
Senior MemberSenior Member
592

PostFeb 07, 2014#125

^And that's why I'm voting no on a 1% sales tax for MoDOT.

Read more posts (566 remaining)