STL PR - Demonstrators oppose SLU's plan to demolish Mill Creek buildings
https://www.stlpr.org/show/st-louis-on- ... -buildings
https://www.stlpr.org/show/st-louis-on- ... -buildings
No. It's a full demo permit. Pulled Monday. They told Landmarks Association that they want a cash offer within 20 days or they're moving forward with demo.dtgwvc wrote: ↑Nov 16, 2023Maybe they got a developer for rehab lined up. Honestly, I wouldn’t mind them being demoed if they were being replaced by something taller, like student apartments.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
You're doing the Lord's work.SRQ2STL wrote: ↑Nov 17, 2023SLU is just land hungry. And will stop at nothing to completely wipe out any remaining old St Louis aesthetic, in the name of their sterile, pruned campus aesthetic. But that's ok. Myself and many others have continued to be a thorn in their ass. And we're not done being little pricks to the administration yet. More to come.
$900,000symphonicpoet wrote: ↑Nov 22, 2023^Are they even listing them anywhere? Loopnet is showing the listing as inactive. What is SLU asking? (Not that I think I'd have a hope in hell of putting anything together, but . . . they could make a neat little venue.)
The LaSalle Park Community Assoc and Legal Services of Eastern Missouri have filed suit against the owners of 1000 Morrison.quincunx wrote: ↑Aug 24, 2022NextSTL - Demo Alert: 1000 Morrison in LaSalle Park
https://nextstl.com/2022/08/demo-alert- ... alle-park/
quincunx wrote:The LaSalle Park Community Assoc and Legal Services of Eastern Missouri have filed suit against the owners of 1000 Morrison.quincunx wrote: ↑Aug 24, 2022NextSTL - Demo Alert: 1000 Morrison in LaSalle Park
https://nextstl.com/2022/08/demo-alert- ... alle-park/
https://www.courts.mo.gov/cnet/cases/ne ... cket=false
Indeed, and it would not have happened without the diligent work of Landmarks Association working feverishly behind the scenes to facilitate this outcome.framer wrote: ↑Jan 31, 2024Damn; those Kranzbergs are awesome!



