Want to fix gun violence in America? Go local.
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/ng- ... in-america
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/ng- ... in-america
This is what happens when you rely solely on social programs to reduce crime without strict policing methods and punishment. You need both.STLrainbow wrote:Pretty good look on the progress/frustration with the "comprehensive crime plan" announced Dec 2015...
One year in, some progress, some frustration with St. Louis crime plan
http://www.stltoday.com/news/local/crim ... 44e30.html
Among the notable rises outside of Chicago were increases of 56 percent in Memphis, 61 percent in San Antonio, 44 percent in Louisville, 36 percent in Phoenix and 31 percent in Las Vegas. Taken together, those six cities accounted for 76 percent of the overall big city murder rise in 2016.
https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/u- ... r-in-2016/The 2016 murder capital of the U.S.
St. Louis likely remained the national murder capital of the United States based on murder rate, with nearly 60 murders per 100,000 residents. St. Louis has had the country’s highest murder rate each year since 2014. Baltimore likely had the country’s second-highest murder rate for the second-consecutive year with roughly 52 murders per 100,000 residents, with Detroit, New Orleans and Cleveland probably rounding out the top five. The table below shows the top 10 big cities in terms of estimated murder rate calculated using the FBI’s 2015 population totals for each city. This kind of cross-city comparison can be tricky, however, because cities draw their borders differently: St. Louis and Baltimore, for example, include only a relatively small geographic area around their downtowns, while cities such as Phoenix and Los Angeles include large suburban areas within their borders.
Sadly, it will start to pick up in the coming weeks. At least we are not Chicago with close to 10 or more so fargregl wrote:I know it's a small data set and in the winter... but through the 1st 8 days of 2017, we've had 1 homicide.
Not a big fan of that piece... as the first snippet shows it did say that the majority of the increase is driven by a few cities, but it didn't address at all the fact that quite a few cities homicide have dropped or are relatively unchanged the past few years. That's important if we're trying to get a better understanding of not only what's going on nationally but also what might be working in those more fortunate cities.quincunx wrote:FiveThirtyEight - U.S. Cities Experienced Another Big Rise In Murder In 2016
Among the notable rises outside of Chicago were increases of 56 percent in Memphis, 61 percent in San Antonio, 44 percent in Louisville, 36 percent in Phoenix and 31 percent in Las Vegas. Taken together, those six cities accounted for 76 percent of the overall big city murder rise in 2016.https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/u- ... r-in-2016/The 2016 murder capital of the U.S.
St. Louis likely remained the national murder capital of the United States based on murder rate, with nearly 60 murders per 100,000 residents. St. Louis has had the country’s highest murder rate each year since 2014. Baltimore likely had the country’s second-highest murder rate for the second-consecutive year with roughly 52 murders per 100,000 residents, with Detroit, New Orleans and Cleveland probably rounding out the top five. The table below shows the top 10 big cities in terms of estimated murder rate calculated using the FBI’s 2015 population totals for each city. This kind of cross-city comparison can be tricky, however, because cities draw their borders differently: St. Louis and Baltimore, for example, include only a relatively small geographic area around their downtowns, while cities such as Phoenix and Los Angeles include large suburban areas within their borders.
We need more of this ahead for sure. I think three or so in the county, btw... I haven't seen a total yet for 2016 but I believe it was up by a decent amount countywide around August or so.gregl wrote:I know it's a small data set and in the winter... but through the 1st 8 days of 2017, we've had 1 homicide.
How do you know it isn't random variance?STLrainbow wrote: Not a big fan of that piece... as the first snippet shows it did say that the majority of the increase is driven by a few cities, but it didn't address at all the fact that quite a few cities homicide have dropped or are relatively unchanged the past few years. That's important if we're trying to get a better understanding of not only what's going on nationally but also what might be working in those more fortunate cities.
we don't. The only thing we really know nationally is we don't know what's going on.MarkHaversham wrote: How do you know it isn't random variance?
I don't understand either. Depressing as heck. That's a must-read piece, btw.andrewarkills wrote:"Grasping for change on America's most violent streets: 'We must stop killing'"
A four-mile stretch on Natural Bridge Avenue in St Louis – not in Chicago or Baltimore – is the place in America most plagued by gun violence
https://www.theguardian.com/world/ng-in ... dge-avenue
I don't understand how the City does not have the information they need to start making targeted inroads in combating this epidemic. Government moves slow is a crappy excuse. They can and have to do more. If this was Ebola, people wouldn't be allowed to fend for themselves. This is also an epidemic which is killing people. Failure to address this is a stain on us all.
The homicide total holds as the city's deadliest in two decades.
Dotson emphasized that per capita, the homicide rate is only about half of the peak, in 1993.
"Everybody talks about crime as the worst they've ever seen it, but if you look at per capita, there are fewer crimes now than there were in 1970 and there's half the amount of crime in the city now than there was in at its peak in 1993," he said.
That said, Dotson acknowledged that violent crimes — homicide, rape, robbery and aggravated assault — were up 4.4 percent over 2015. Rapes were up by 25, robberies by 114 and aggravated assaults by 116.
they fixed it after I tweeted them... again it's our overall crime rate that is down about half from the per capita high in '93. btw, if we did enjoy half the homicide rate of '93, we'd be sitting around 110 homicides per year which is roughly what we were able to reach in 2011 & 2012 before rising again. A rate of 35 is still high compared to other cities but if we can drive back down to that level again over the course of the next few years it would nevertheless be a big win.STLrainbow wrote:^ that's blatantly wrong about per capita homicides being about half compared to 1993... it's about 60 now and was about 70 in 93.
It will happen soon probably. Along with Detroit and other Cities that have high murder rates. How will it be fixed? I don't have a clue but I know one thing is for sure that we will have a Tweet sent our way soon calling for us to get our act together.Ebsy wrote:If we don't get the murder rate down, Donald Trump might threaten to invade us!