493
Full MemberFull Member
493

PostNov 12, 2015#3101

By no means an apples-to-apples comparison, but I thought it notable that Texas (a state whose economy is humming and state that is often cited for being friendly to business) subsidizes sports as much as any state in the union. It's unfortunate, but generous tax subsidies could considered a fact of hosting a pro sports franchise (NFL, MLB, racing, etc.) in your city.

Formula 1 fans launch Twitter movement to save race in Austin

http://ftw.usatoday.com/2015/11/formula ... reg-abbott

Texas gives COTA ~$25 million a year. Just amazing really.

1,067
Expert MemberExpert Member
1,067

PostNov 12, 2015#3102

The business journal article above indicated Kroenke was present. An article I read yesterday said Demoff and Kroenke's attorney were flying to NYC but it was nebulous as to whether Stan would hear the taskforce's presentation.

Was this the first documented example of Stan actually in front of the taskforce since Stan and Dave's superbowl cocktail party conversation?

The meeting lasting 2 hours is very encouraging if originally slated for 45 min. Daniel Kaplan was somewhat encouraging this morning on Bernie's show as he still things Raiders Chargers are the movers.

5,705
Life MemberLife Member
5,705

PostNov 12, 2015#3103

I can't see how anyone in Oakland and San Diego or Stan K for that matter could be happy hearing about the Raiders & Chargers taking on Disney Exec to lead the Carson project. I thought that was huge, at a minimum it is a high powered well connected exec to lead things at the right time or something a lot a bigger such Disney wanting to be part of a NFL/LA deal, maybe but out NFL studios. Who knows what the intention is but it certainly adds some legitimacy to Carson stadium

In the meantime in Oakland, they are still trying to figure out how to deal with the old stadium

http://www.bizjournals.com/sanfrancisco ... chaaf.html

Oakland could pay off some $100 million in remaining debt for O.co Coliseum before it's due as it looks at ways to fund a new stadium for the Oakland Raiders.

After meeting Wednesday with a group of National Football League owners in New York, Oakland Mayor Libby Schaaf said in a statement that the city is working to "defease the current bond" and buy out Alameda County's stake in the land, the Coliseum and Oracle Arena.

8,155
Life MemberLife Member
8,155

PostNov 12, 2015#3104

^ Before the news of the Iger involvement I pretty much was of the mind that Carson was more or less a long shot but that development is a big advance.... there's a lot of scenarios out there but I wouldn't doubt we could see both Inglewood and Carson move forward with Davis remaining in Oakland.

I can also see NFL choosing Carson and not Inglewood but what I don't see happening is NFL giving a thumbs up to the STL proposal; at best Kroenke will be free to leave elsewhere (besides LA) if that is what he wants.

3,433
Life MemberLife Member
3,433

PostNov 12, 2015#3105

The NFL will not give G4 money to two stadium in LA. I was wondering if the rumor that they may wait until March to decide, is so San Diego and St. Louis can both have public votes. They are probably thinking two no votes could lead to a Rams/Chargers solution in LA.

8,155
Life MemberLife Member
8,155

PostNov 12, 2015#3106

^ Are we sure both projects -- or either -- would need it? Don't think San Diego was planning a vote until June, btw, but I can't really recall. Who knows, they may not even decide this winter if nobody budges and ownership is deadlocked. And then we'll all go insane.

8,912
Life MemberLife Member
8,912

PostNov 12, 2015#3107

Rams stay but leave for the county a real option?


9,570
Life MemberLife Member
9,570

PostNov 12, 2015#3108

I think if that happens Stan would still ask for State and County $ but the process would probably be slowed down a whole lot and the Rams would play at the Dome 2016,2017,2018 seasons and possibly 2019

8,155
Life MemberLife Member
8,155

PostNov 12, 2015#3109

^ that's the best scenario... pay off current Dome debt as much as possible and then get a cooperatve regional funding arrangement. But who knows what's in his mind. Maybe he'll try for London.

9,570
Life MemberLife Member
9,570

PostNov 12, 2015#3110

^ i think the Jags have the upper hand on London, Stan lost that hand when he went all in for LA. Also i cant ever see a team in another continent unless its an expansion team.

3,433
Life MemberLife Member
3,433

PostNov 12, 2015#3111

So if a new downtown stadium is not acceptable to Kroenke, then why did he want a $700M upgrade to a stadium downtown? Oh wait, I guess he never did want that. He just used that to get out to LA.

PostNov 13, 2015#3112

Here is a financing summary from Andy Banker. I have to look through it. He didn't spread the game day revenue, so I'll have to try to do that to confirm that the city yearly delta is $3M in 2015 dollars, as dbdnSouthCity computed. This is the first place I've seen that Metrolink takes a small hit if the Rams leave. Why would that's be? Game day riders? Looks too high for that.

http://fox2now.com/2015/11/12/crunching ... -proposal/

8,155
Life MemberLife Member
8,155

PostNov 13, 2015#3113

gary kreie wrote:So if a new downtown stadium is not acceptable to Kroenke, then why did he want a $700M upgrade to a stadium downtown? Oh wait, I guess he never did want that. He just used that to get out to LA.
Kroenke probably was set to go to LA back then as well, but who knows.... anyway, there is a big difference b/w a top-tier multi-purpose dome and a more limited open-air stadium. That is a big reason why Blank was willing to commit so much to the Georgia Dome replacement. And if you look at Kroenke's Inglewood plan, you can see why he is pursuing that... it can attract the big marquee events on a year-round basis and is part of a larger development he has a stake in. The riverfront open air stadium satisfies neither of those interests... it offers little potential to satiate the developer side of himself nor the ability to get the big time events that need to be held in a Dome.

So it's interesting to see what may transpire if he stays.... pursuing a renovated Dome hopefully would be part of the discussion. And Maryland Hts. might be able to become something sort of like the Patriot's set-up in Foxboro w/ surrounding development.

1,878
Never Logs OffNever Logs Off
1,878

PostNov 13, 2015#3114

Yeah, I think (pure speculation, FTR) the Maryland Heights property buy is a leverage play. If the NFL tells Stan the Rams have to stay and to work with the STL-NFL commission to build a new stadium there, then he'll at least have another option. 'You want a downtown stadium? Then do this and this and this or I'll work with the county to build one in the flats.'

That said, while I'd still like to see the team stay downtown, if that comes to fruition and Kroenke really wants to build his own complex in MH with his own money as opposed to being a tenant of a government-owned building (like he's currently planning to do in Inglewood), then godspeed to him. I'll make the trek out there to watch a game, too.

-RBB

7,810
Life MemberLife Member
7,810

PostNov 13, 2015#3115

rbb wrote:Yeah, I think (pure speculation, FTR) the Maryland Heights property buy is a leverage play. If the NFL tells Stan the Rams have to stay and to work with the STL-NFL commission to build a new stadium there, then he'll at least have another option. 'You want a downtown stadium? Then do this and this and this or I'll work with the county to build one in the flats.'

That said, while I'd still like to see the team stay downtown, if that comes to fruition and Kroenke really wants to build his own complex in MH with his own money as opposed to being a tenant of a government-owned building (like he's currently planning to do in Inglewood), then godspeed to him. I'll make the trek out there to watch a game, too.

-RBB
I'll also happily go out to Maryland Heights. (I can't believe I just typed that.)

283
Full MemberFull Member
283

PostNov 13, 2015#3116

A privately financed, non eminent domain using stadium in Maryland Heights is the best outcome, IMO. Far, far preferable to the bullsh*t that has been going on with the north riverfront.

Rams stay, fans get a typical outdoors tailgating opportunity, no eminent domain is used on rightful property owners, the north riverfront can go ahead with what looks to be a very nice "plan B", Edward Jones Dome can be used to bring more convention business downtown.

1,067
Expert MemberExpert Member
1,067

PostNov 13, 2015#3117

If National Car Rental Field won't end up hosting the NFL, I wonder how hard Peacock would push to scale it back into an MLS venue to remain relevant in the expansion race over the next few years? Follow up, if Stan builds a Rams' Complex in MH and owned it all, would that increase his desire to host/share MLS?

Also, I attended a local sports dinner last night where Randy spoke. A few thoughts from Randy and some STL attorneys/business leaders:

-Randy and the station leaders at 101.1 have not been able to contact Kevin Demoff or any Rams' administration since Randy's speech at the town hall meeting. He said literally minutes after he spoke, a usually open line of communication has been closed down.
-Randy still thinks Stan has eye on Broncos as a possibility. Apparently 5 of the Bowlen kids want to sell. 2 don't
-Randy has heard that the Taylors (the daughter is apparently the biggest sports fan) may have interest in purchasing the Rams should they be available
-The Peacock family and Taylor family have a long standing relationship
-According to some city attorneys and judges, the aldermen are putting on a good show, but don't have the votes to stop the funding
- The Bob Iger news is a big deal for Carson

459
Full MemberFull Member
459

PostNov 13, 2015#3118

Can someone pls tell me what is this "Plan B" everyone seems to referenced?

8,155
Life MemberLife Member
8,155

PostNov 13, 2015#3119

^ Plan B actually was Plan A before the stadium came around.... it's the plan by GRG for the redevelopment of the Near North Riverfront. There's a thread somewhere around here on it.

1,093
Expert MemberExpert Member
1,093

PostNov 13, 2015#3120

courtland wrote:Can someone pls tell me what is this "Plan B" everyone seems to referenced?
http://nextstl.com/2015/07/north-riverf ... l-stadium/

9,570
Life MemberLife Member
9,570

PostNov 14, 2015#3121

Aesir
Maryland Heights stadium would not be privately financed. Stan would most likely ask for the state $250m and probably the same amount from the county

141
Junior MemberJunior Member
141

PostNov 14, 2015#3122

Can anyone enlighten me about what having the Plan B means? As far as I know, it's basically a detailed brainstorm by a group who doesn't own any of the land or have any funding mechanism to follow through with the plan. I guess my question is, what is the point of making this plan?

3,433
Life MemberLife Member
3,433

PostNov 14, 2015#3123

Does Plan B have any funding or backing by a corporation or person with money? Or is it just artwork? Would it require public money? How much per year?

9,570
Life MemberLife Member
9,570

PostNov 14, 2015#3124

I would assume if the public put up $400m for plan b like it is for plan A there would be a lot more than $610m
In private money lined up. Heck for $400m private you could get $1b-2b private

5,705
Life MemberLife Member
5,705

PostNov 14, 2015#3125

For about a tenth, or $41 million. Public/Alderman want a new residential high rises or two going up they simply can give plan b public money to Cordish.

Read more posts (2377 remaining)