525
Senior MemberSenior Member
525

PostFeb 12, 2008#626

They have dug up the old gas storage tanks from the former gas station at this site.

407
Full MemberFull Member
407

PostFeb 15, 2008#627

So the "Phase 2" site is going to have 3 new homes built? I noticed the crews there too and was wondering what was going on. So they have removed the old gas tanks and plan on starting actual construction of the homes now? Are there any plans are mockups available?



And I have just been looking over it the past few months, but isn't that BSI construction trailer on the "Phase 1" site new?

1,026
Expert MemberExpert Member
1,026

PostFeb 15, 2008#628

I'm confused. They're building homes on lots that the Gilded Age plans to level (in their vaguely planned phase II)? Does this mean that the dreaded Phase II is off the table? Seems to.

407
Full MemberFull Member
407

PostFeb 15, 2008#629

^I'm with you on your confusion. THat looks like the case though.

1,770
Never Logs OffNever Logs Off
1,770

PostFeb 15, 2008#630

Gilded Age is not building these homes. Once their Phase II was taken off the table, this project got the green light (it had been on hold). This does make Gilded Age's Phase II less likely though, and hopefully will result in the other houses being fixed up soon.

407
Full MemberFull Member
407

PostFeb 15, 2008#631

What was the proposed footprint for the original "Phase II"? With these new homes the previous plans could clearly not be followed. Taking this section out of the equation would there still be enough space for them to even bother with a second phase?

480
Full MemberFull Member
480

PostFeb 15, 2008#632

TGE-ATW wrote:Gilded Age is not building these homes. Once their Phase II was taken off the table, this project got the green light (it had been on hold). This does make Gilded Age's Phase II less likely though, and hopefully will result in the other houses being fixed up soon.


Prior to the plans for 'Phase II', what was the main deterrent that prevented the other houses from being fixed up?

1,770
Never Logs OffNever Logs Off
1,770

PostFeb 15, 2008#633

They were excluded from the Soulard, Lafayette Square, and John Nepomuk complex historic districts (which surround them) for somewhat arbitrary reasons. They were isolated by highway and interchange construction and basically left as orphaned step children, despite possessing great integrity as a knot of intact historic buildings with valuable architectural character. Because they were not in historic districts, they were not eligible for the state and federal historic rehabilitation tax credits that have contributed so significantly to the revitalization of the surrounding neighborhoods.

480
Full MemberFull Member
480

PostFeb 15, 2008#634

TGE-ATW wrote:They were excluded from the Soulard, Lafayette Square, and John Nepomuk complex historic districts (which surround them) for somewhat arbitrary reasons. They were isolated by highway and interchange construction and basically left as orphaned step children, despite possessing great integrity as a knot of intact historic buildings with valuable architectural character. Because they were not in historic districts, they were not eligible for the state and federal historic rehabilitation tax credits that have contributed so significantly to the revitalization of the surrounding neighborhoods.


Have they since been included in a Historic District that would make them qualify for Tax Credits? They're still cut off by the highway but it's hard to believe these buildings are in the shape they're in when they lie in such a highly visible and centralized location.



I asked a few posts back about one of them that literally was rehabbed, put on the market, bought by the LCRA, and boarded up. That one seems to be in a strange situation as I've seen pictures of the inside and it looked completely done. How it is sitting there with a board on its front window is beyond me.

1,770
Never Logs OffNever Logs Off
1,770

PostFeb 15, 2008#635

I can only speculate that that happened because the city was in cahoots (at the behest of Alderman Young) with Guilded Age and their earlier plan. They buildings are not in a historic district now and probably never will be. However, as the area around them gets better and more desirable there will come an economic tipping point where it won't be necessary to use tax credit incentives to make their rehabilitation a profitable venture. Of course, this would hold more true if the planned commercial development interacted with them rather than facing them with a stark sidewall.

125
Junior MemberJunior Member
125

PostFeb 21, 2008#636

Sunflower Markets, which is owned by Supervalu, developer of the City Market concept has closed all their stores. Schuncks has annouced their downtown endeavour.



Where does this leave Georgian Square? My take is that this property will be vacant for years to come.

407
Full MemberFull Member
407

PostFeb 21, 2008#637

I think that a Schnucks at Bohemian Hill would be pulling from a different customer base than downtown. I think they can both coexist. I could live with a good Shop N Save though.

525
Senior MemberSenior Member
525

PostFeb 21, 2008#638

Georgian Square Dierberg's?

12K
Life MemberLife Member
12K

PostFeb 22, 2008#639

Conurbation wrote: I could live with a good Shop N Save though.


Is there such a thing?

331
Full MemberFull Member
331

PostFeb 22, 2008#640

Re: potential grocer: I think we should let Vince and sons open a humongous Vincent's market with G+W, Tropicana Market and Digregorio satellite locations.

407
Full MemberFull Member
407

PostFeb 25, 2008#641

Framer wrote:
Conurbation wrote: I could live with a good Shop N Save though.


Is there such a thing?


Actually yes. I lived in St. Chuck in former days and the Shop N Save by my house was totally nice. I'd peg it at about the quality of a Schnucks. As long as its new and run by a competent manager it would be fine.

125
Junior MemberJunior Member
125

PostMar 05, 2008#642

The was a zoning meeting today to rezone Phase II from residential to commercial. This involved the property for the Butler's Pantry. It passed. Chris Goodson stated construction to begin in 30 days.



NOTE: this is not the Bohemian Hill development.

90
New MemberNew Member
90

PostMar 06, 2008#643

Watcher wrote:Sunflower Markets, which is owned by Supervalu, developer of the City Market concept has closed all their stores. Schuncks has annouced their downtown endeavour.



Where does this leave Georgian Square? My take is that this property will be vacant for years to come.


Unfortunately my gut feeling says I'd have to agree with you. Does anyone have any new solid info in regard to this project? I'm scheduled to look at a unit in the Georgian this weekend and have some mixed feelings about the area in general.

1,770
Never Logs OffNever Logs Off
1,770

PostMar 06, 2008#644

Things seem to be moving ahead with the new infill along Tucker, the environmental remediation guys have been out there working on the site (saw em today). To me, that means the threatened buildings are probably safe. As far as the shopping center goes, I think it'll happen. Guilded Age etc have been very slow on their projects in the area of the Georgian, this is no exception. The bottom line is, regardless of the economic slow-down, the calculations they must have done regarding the capability of the area to support a supermarket etc have not changed. This is not a residential project, they don't have to find new homeowners in an incredibly soft market. All they have to do is build a shopping center for the surrounding neighborhoods that they already determined needed one.

390
Full MemberFull Member
390

PostMay 23, 2008#645

I heard that this project is dead.



Anyone else hear that?

525
Senior MemberSenior Member
525

PostMay 23, 2008#646

^Which part? This thread covers a few different things in that area.



I recently noticed an additional sign on the Georgian Square corner. A banner specific for Walgreen's stating "Coming Soon" and listing their website/careers.com

2,190
Life MemberLife Member
2,190

PostMay 23, 2008#647

Thanks for posting that. I saw that sign yesterday and wondered.



(On the downside, it will be repulsive if that development is now reduced to just a Walgreen's.)

101
Junior MemberJunior Member
101

PostMay 23, 2008#648

GelatinousEndive wrote:I heard that this project is dead.



Anyone else hear that?


I don't think it is dead... They just put a new large sign up today for the new Walgreens. I think the Walgreens is a go, but the City Market and Starbucks are stalled. (hopefully not dead)

371
Full MemberFull Member
371

PostMay 23, 2008#649

Maybe they're taking extra time to redesign the project to uphold urban design practices.



Or not. Wishful thinking, I know.

145
Junior MemberJunior Member
145

PostMay 31, 2008#650

my guess is the redesign of the 44 exit ramp onto truman pkwy is slowing things down. one can only image how fast the hwy dept works.

Read more posts (369 remaining)