101
Junior MemberJunior Member
101

PostNov 08, 2008#3976

I hoped for a taller office building also, but at least the project is moving forward. maybe the second phase will bring taller buildings.

346
Full MemberFull Member
346

PostNov 08, 2008#3977

:D Who's Excited!!! not me. Were on page 266 on this thread and not one lick of activity on the site.

101
Junior MemberJunior Member
101

PostNov 08, 2008#3978

There is plenty of activity on the site. There moving dirt all over the place down there.

6,662
AdministratorAdministrator
6,662

PostNov 08, 2008#3979

^That's been done for a while...

2,821
Life MemberLife Member
2,821

PostNov 08, 2008#3980

^Well, there's grass growing, and cars parking...



As utterly pointless as it is to talk about this latest iteration of Ballpark "Village" renderings, I will still make a few observations. 1) The conceptual site plan is much improved, with no green space and actual thru streets (or so it appears). 2) Nice design for the office "tower", although I think the bleacher seats are stupid - just make it a terraced party deck. 3) Other than the office tower, I still have no idea what areas of that site plan are supposed to be constructed in Phase I, but then I suspect neither do the Cardinals or Cordish.

139
Junior MemberJunior Member
139

PostNov 09, 2008#3981

17 stories.....blah....





I had a feeling this development would turn out minaturized and half assed.

1,067
Expert MemberExpert Member
1,067

PostNov 09, 2008#3982

Hey at least it's a good looking building. Given the market, it might as well start off conservative and expand as necessary based on demand and popularity (which I believe will be inevitable once it becomes functional and the general public sees the advantages from a residential, retail, and corporate perspective)



I thought, however, that the backbone of Phase I was going to be an office tower at the corner of Broadway and Clark. The current rendering looks great to me, however that is not where I saw the first tower going.

252
Full MemberFull Member
252

PostNov 09, 2008#3983

From jlblues post of the layout, it looks like there will be another building to the right of the office building at some point. I hope its the residential building. If they allowed people to put a deposit down on residential units, I bet they would get quite a few reserved ones.

2,821
Life MemberLife Member
2,821

PostNov 10, 2008#3984

DeBaliviere wrote:I paused my DVR to see if I could make out any of the tenants on the site plan they briefly flashed on the screen. The only one I could make out was Flying Saucer Draught Emporium. Lame.
You missed Fuego/Tengo Sed Cantina just to the west.


Blzhrpmd2 wrote:I thought, however, that the backbone of Phase I was going to be an office tower at the corner of Broadway and Clark. The current rendering looks great to me, however that is not where I saw the first tower going.
I'd suggest that the location of any non-speculative office building will always be determined by the largest tenant, not the developer. In other words, that's the view Stifel wants, and the rest of Ballpark "Village" will just have to be laid out as best as it can be around that. :wink:

139
Junior MemberJunior Member
139

PostNov 10, 2008#3985

I know it's a nice looking building and all, but I'm a little disapointed that it won't even break 300 feet.

2,821
Life MemberLife Member
2,821

PostNov 10, 2008#3986

^How disappointed will you be if it doesn't break 0 feet?

190
Junior MemberJunior Member
190

PostNov 10, 2008#3987

the bowling pin on the rendering probably represents a Lucky Strike bowling Alley. The KC Power and Light and the Fourth Street Live in Louisville each have one.



As for the "bar mall", I think that is a pretty accurate assessment of what we are going to get. The other businesses/districts around town better start making some contingency plans, because if Kansas City is any guide they are going to suffer a serious drop in revenue.

139
Junior MemberJunior Member
139

PostNov 12, 2008#3988

jlblues wrote:^How disappointed will you be if it doesn't break 0 feet?


I could care less at this point. I knew this development would turn out like this. It always does here.

2,821
Life MemberLife Member
2,821

PostNov 13, 2008#3989

2taall wrote:I could care less at this point.
So you do care?

5,631
Life MemberLife Member
5,631

PostNov 13, 2008#3990

To some extent, apparently.

139
Junior MemberJunior Member
139

PostNov 14, 2008#3991

I care, but I'm pretty disapointed. Let's put it that way.

508
Senior MemberSenior Member
508

PostNov 17, 2008#3992

What does any of this have to do with BPV??? I keep checking to see what the new comments are but it's been the same BS for the last 4 days about the proper use of the term "couldn't care less"... I couldn't care less about it....


Thread has been cleaned up by moderators 11/17/2008 8:30 P.M. Thank you for your post and interest. Forum Rules/Regulations:



stay on-topic

Posts should be directly related to the focus of this forum and the subject of discussion. In general, only post if you have something relevant to say about the topic being discussed. There will be some leniency on this, and we don't mind if you bring in another idea or two, but stay focused. If you think it's a good enough topic, start a new thread about it. This also prevents losing a good idea in a thread about another topic. Threads that wander off-topic will be closed and/or trimmed or moved to its appropriate forum.



low content posts

Do not make posts with no real purpose or content (out of laziness or just to increase post count). Refrain from posting short follow-up messages that contribute nothing to a thread, such as "I agree" or "Me too" and only post if you are going to contribute to the discussion in a constructive way. Secondly, use your edit button to keep from posting two or more consecutive messages in a thread to reflect one train of thought. Moderators may consolidate or delete posts to improve readability of a thread.

359
Full MemberFull Member
359

PostJan 05, 2009#3993

The folks over at InsideSTL.com took a field trip to Ballpark Village today. Here is a link to current pics of the site and their story!



http://www.insidestl.com/STLCardinals/t ... llage.aspx

101
Junior MemberJunior Member
101

PostJan 05, 2009#3994

When I saw this come up I was hoping there would be some good news, but its just the same old stuff. :x

1,067
Expert MemberExpert Member
1,067

PostJan 05, 2009#3995

I wish people expended as much energy on finding ways to better the city as they did on mocking. Hopefully we can find other means to show the nation some pluses to our city. The economy is no small excuse as to why this project is stalled (not the only reason and I am not pardoning the jerks that let it get this far).



Let's not ourselves have the blinders on left field but realize that hundreds of thousands will be in hotels in downtown, CWE, Clayton, and the entire metro. Putting our best foot forward in other areas will help compensate.



Instead of coming up with defensive answers to the visitors regarding one plot of land, let's be ready with enthusiastic suggestions for other things they can do while here, other parts of town to check out if "they" find downtown not to their liking. Most on this forum seem to be proponents that no one project should make or break a neighborhood, district, or city. By fixating on the BPV issue, aren't we enabling the contrary?



When the All-Star game was in Detroit, was it a massive failure despite a lack of ultra-urban amenities?

196
Junior MemberJunior Member
196

PostJan 05, 2009#3996

One of the last news reports I read about this was that construction was supposed to begin after the first of the new year. This was reported back in September-October.



Soo......



Any word on if anything will begin? I'm beyond disappointment at the moment.

8,912
Life MemberLife Member
8,912

PostJan 05, 2009#3997

^ The Cardinals also said they would make some moves in the off season... Unreal how mismanaged this operation is.

1,026
Expert MemberExpert Member
1,026

PostJan 06, 2009#3998

well now that Brian Fuentes - their "top priority" - has signed with another team they'll have time to devote towards the BPV

5,705
Life MemberLife Member
5,705

PostJan 06, 2009#3999

I don't think mismanaged is a fair word, for one thing. Who has knowledge of all the inner workings of this project to make a blanket statement. I think a fair statment, unfortunately for the region, is that Cordish is pursuing this project to maximize its own profit as in all its deals. In this case, since they don't own the land, have ties to St. Lou and have locked in DeWitt, can sit on their bottom and work out the best deals. Building without tenant committments would certainly reduce profits and hastily signing tenants agreements without getting a maximum return on premium real estate is also good way pass up profits.



I have a different take that things might or might no move quickly this winter. I think they will move quickly since the mayor election and new govenor will change things if deals are not finalized. Starting over on TIFS and Tax credits would be a huge a gamble on Cordish and DeWitt's part. The process has started and can't be changed by new politics unless they start over again.

8,912
Life MemberLife Member
8,912

PostJan 06, 2009#4000

Maybe the BPV delay is a good thing!



Kansas City, Mo.

The souring economy is likely to add fuel to the debate over how far Kansas City should go to woo development. The city said Cordish Cos. of Baltimore has met its contractual obligations with the city to deliver its Kansas City Power & Light District, a retail and entertainment project credited by some with helping revitalize the downtown.



Cordish said it has delivered roughly 600,000 square feet of retail, which is now about 70% occupied. But lower-than-projected retail sales per square foot and later-than-expected openings in nonrestaurant retail mean sales-tax revenue from the project will fall short of what is needed to cover the debt service on the city bonds issued to help pay for the district's development, according to Troy Schulte, the city's budget officer. The city expects to have to cover a $4 million budget gap on the project's debt service for the year ending April 30.

David Cordish, chairman of Cordish, acknowledges that fashion-type retailers have been hit harder than entertainment retail but maintains the project has met its contractual obligations, is a success and that more retail is still on tap, including a grocery store set to officially open in January.



http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1230675 ... s&ru=yahoo





EFFF having one giant project as "Downtowns saving grace".... Let's forget BPV, divide the land into parcels, and sell them off to the highest bidder!

Read more posts (760 remaining)