^ Interesting idea but seems that the feasibility of physically moving Peabody tower would not make it a wise move nor is the tower worth saving IMO if your goal is to open up the Gateway Mall. I think you would just be better off giving incentives for a new BPV tower or Mike Shannon site and cover the cost of imploding and removing the current Peabody tower. Heck, you could probably raise funds for purchase and demo via Gateway foundation or how a chunk of Arch Grounds was funded but that seems like impractical use of any funds raised when their is plenty work you could accomplished on the current mall.
But have to be careful with suggestions, you might give City Leadership the thought of building a squat parking garage in its place in order to lure an anchor tenant for nearby ATT building
But have to be careful with suggestions, you might give City Leadership the thought of building a squat parking garage in its place in order to lure an anchor tenant for nearby ATT building






















