219
Junior MemberJunior Member
219

PostApr 06, 2014#1351

. . .Back to Ballpark village news. . .

933
Super MemberSuper Member
933

PostApr 06, 2014#1352

Yeah, we got off track. Point being that colleges are totally f-cked, although I would still love to see a campus around the size of SLU Law built in BPV anyway. Even if it's only going to be there for 15 years before it closes.

1,982
Never Logs OffNever Logs Off
1,982

PostApr 06, 2014#1353

I almost went to BPV last night before getting the text that our plans head changed to elsewhere. However, I was already downtown near it, and it was hopping. I know it's still the new thing, but I genuinely see this being true a lot.

It seemed very bro-y, but there's nothing wrong with that. Everyone needs a place to hang out. Downtown just got a heck of a lot more popular, and I'm super excited about that.

4,489
Super ModeratorSuper Moderator
4,489

PostApr 07, 2014#1354

roger wyoming II wrote:
goat314 wrote: I hate to keep saying this, but downtown will likely not see much new construction until most if not all of the remaining buildings are rehabilitated. Then we will probably have a new construction boom that will put a lot of cities to shame.
I don't really agree with this. If developers believe there is enough demand to move forward, new towers will arise... simple as that. In fact, there may be an incentive to move faster than slower if there is a believe that a rehabbed Jefferson Arms and Butler Bros. buildings etc. and other towers in the Central Corridor would bring competitive units onto the market.
I agree with you. I respect goat314's insight, but I disagree that new construction will (or has to) take a backseat until existing structures are rehabilitated. This happens in no city that I am aware. NONE. I have lived in different cities and I follow city forums regularly. Even over in Kansas City they have two of the State's tallest structures (P&L and Commerce) sitting empty with "plans" for redevelopment - yet Cordish is about to crack the ground open for a 25-story residential tower. Chicago has probably built more residential towers in The Loop than all other major Midwest cities combined have built in their cities - yet there are still some empty towers in downtown Chicago. Same with Atlanta, Houston, Dallas, LA etc.

There's definitely work to be done in downtown STL, however, new construction can help expedite the rehabilitation of existing structures and the rehab of existing structures could help to spark new construction.

Also, my understanding that there's 92% occupancy downtown. There's a whole lot of room for growth. If that number represented Atlanta, Dallas or some other major city........plans would be on paper and the cranes would be up.

St. Louis drives me crazy. Everything is approached with too much trepidation.

3,235
Life MemberLife Member
3,235

PostApr 07, 2014#1355

I went there this weekend and my opinion was that a lot of people from out of town and the western burbs will like it but overall I question the longevity without surrounding development. It’s a very mall like and generic development. Most places are not accessible from the outside. It creates very little foot traffic since you hop around from bar to bar without leaving the complex. It’s designed to keep everybody’s money inside the development. It so far has rigid borders instead of actually relating to its surrounding and bleeding into the fabric of downtown.

I am glad it’s finally open and see how it will be an asset to downtown but I will patronize other parts of the city like Wash Ave, CWE, Grove, Soulard, etc for my entertainment needs.

641
Senior MemberSenior Member
641

PostApr 07, 2014#1356

^yep..its not for everyone. and that's the beauty of STL, we can all pick and choose where to spend our dollars.

613
Senior MemberSenior Member
613

PostApr 07, 2014#1357

With BPV open as an entertainment district, I believe Wash Ave needs to refocus on becoming a residential area comprised of lofts and higher-end restaurants/retail with a few bars sprinkled in between. It was heading in this direction 5-7 years ago before it got off track. The type up business the MX is developing should be expanded down the course of the street. BPV will be much better suited for bachelor/bachelorette parties and big "bro-nights out" crowds.

The 2 areas need to complement not compete with each other.

907
Super MemberSuper Member
907

PostApr 07, 2014#1358

^agreed

488
Full MemberFull Member
488

PostApr 07, 2014#1359

downtown2007 wrote:I went there this weekend and my opinion was that a lot of people from out of town and the western burbs will like it but overall I question the longevity without surrounding development. It’s a very mall like and generic development. Most places are not accessible from the outside. It creates very little foot traffic since you hop around from bar to bar without leaving the complex. It’s designed to keep everybody’s money inside the development. It so far has rigid borders instead of actually relating to its surrounding and bleeding into the fabric of downtown.

I am glad it’s finally open and see how it will be an asset to downtown but I will patronize other parts of the city like Wash Ave, CWE, Grove, Soulard, etc for my entertainment needs.
I was there on Friday night. As the type of person who reads this forum I assumed I wouldn't like it that much either.

I really really liked it though. I had a great time. I live in Soulard and usually go out around Soulard or Wash Ave. and this was another area I think that'll be added to the rotation.

One criticism everyone I talked to though agreed on was that they have to use plastic bottles and plastic cups. You can't have people standing above a crowd of other people leaning over a railing and either drop a bottle or throw a bottle and seriously hurt someone. I would not be surprised to see something like that in the next couple weeks.

267
Full MemberFull Member
267

PostApr 08, 2014#1360

downtown2007 wrote:I went there this weekend and my opinion was that a lot of people from out of town and the western burbs will like it but overall I question the longevity without surrounding development. It’s a very mall like and generic development. Most places are not accessible from the outside. It creates very little foot traffic since you hop around from bar to bar without leaving the complex. It’s designed to keep everybody’s money inside the development. It so far has rigid borders instead of actually relating to its surrounding and bleeding into the fabric of downtown.

I am glad it’s finally open and see how it will be an asset to downtown but I will patronize other parts of the city like Wash Ave, CWE, Grove, Soulard, etc for my entertainment needs.

I dropped in to see it after the game today and had pretty much these exact same thoughts. People there seemed to be enjoying it, but it looked and felt like being in a small indoor mall with a lot of alcohol. Just from being in there a few minutes (and I'm not sure if this is actually true), it seemed like almost all of the entrances to the different venues could only be accessed once you were inside the complex. If that's true, I think the current ability of BPV to make downtown "feel" more active will be limited because of its limited effect on street life. Maybe that will change in future phases, but this current phase seemed to have the effect of "sucking in" the energy and activity of the baseball crowd rather than building upon the energy to make the immediate vicinity of the stadium feel more active.

234
Junior MemberJunior Member
234

PostApr 08, 2014#1361

All of the venues inside Ballpark Village have outside entrances, too. There are entrances on Clark St. for Budweiser Brew House and Cardinals Nation, and there are entrances for Howl at the Moon and PBR on the other side by Drunken Fish. Lines to all of them were very long yesterday.
I watched the game inside Fox Sports Midwest Live and had a great time. It was better than just watching the game on TV at home. We got to see the between inning events from inside the stadium, such as the Cap Dance and Kiss Cam, so it almost felt like being at the game.

623
Senior MemberSenior Member
623

PostApr 08, 2014#1362

Curious...
How were the crowds at the traditional game day bars, like Paddy O's? Any noticeable difference? I know opening day probably isn't the best gauge.

7,810
Life MemberLife Member
7,810

PostApr 08, 2014#1363

DannyJ wrote:...People there seemed to be enjoying it, but it looked and felt like being in a small indoor mall with a lot of alcohol. Just from being in there a few minutes (and I'm not sure if this is actually true), it seemed like almost all of the entrances to the different venues could only be accessed once you were inside the complex. If that's true, I think the current ability of BPV to make downtown "feel" more active will be limited because of its limited effect on street life. Maybe that will change in future phases, but this current phase seemed to have the effect of "sucking in" the energy and activity of the baseball crowd rather than building upon the energy to make the immediate vicinity of the stadium feel more active.
My thoughts:
-your mall description is dead on correct. It's basically a food court surrounded by anchor stores.
-BPV didn't seem to damage other places as Paddy O's, Kilroys, Mike Shannon's and Flying Saucer as all seemed opening day busy. We'll see how the trend continues.
-they didn't allow tailgating on the BPV parking lot.
-there was still a huge crowd at 10pm to watch the Kentucky/UConn game
-I know some people had been drinking for all day long. But it seemed like lots of drunks pouring out of BPV chose to jaywalk into traffic on Broadway, Walnut and 8th streets.

396
Full MemberFull Member
396

PostApr 08, 2014#1364

I went down for opening day and really enjoyed myself.

Is it generic and mall like? Yeah, but it is a party zone for game day. And it does a great job with that. For example, the TV's in the Brew-house show the live feed from the stadium, so you hear everything that they hear in the stadium (including scoreboard stuff like the cap dance, kiss cam etc. No commercials).

The group that I was with, really enjoyed this, because it felt like we were actually at the game. The food at Brew House was tasty and service was good, even though the place was crazy packed.

And yes, each venue, has its own outside entrance.

I think it will do great on game day. I think it will be a hit with tourists who go to the hall of fame museum and grab a bite or drink after. AND I think an occasional city lover will venture in and enjoy it like I did!

In my opinion, the other bars (Mike Shannons) had plenty of people and were still packed during the game. As it was said before, Cities are supposed to have something for everyone, including visitors and suburbanites....

And here is the real shocker. I went in and thought I would HATE the PBR bar, but it was actually a lot of fun. Good music (country, hip hop, rock, etc) and the eye candy was an added plus.

Will BPV, replace my favorite places in the city, no, but I will be back for big games and may even watch the blues Playoffs there...

8,912
Life MemberLife Member
8,912

PostApr 08, 2014#1365

I've only heard very positive reviews from friends both first hand and via social media.

1,792
Never Logs OffNever Logs Off
1,792

PostApr 08, 2014#1366

Went a few days ago. Not my crowd but it definitely seems to have met expectations. At least so far. The big screens are hypnotic. I realize it goes a little against the prevailing opinion on this site but I'd think an extension of the entertainment offerings could be a part of future phases. I keep thinking they need to add some roof top batting cages...

7,810
Life MemberLife Member
7,810

PostApr 08, 2014#1367

mattonarsenal wrote:Curious...
How were the crowds at the traditional game day bars, like Paddy O's? Any noticeable difference? I know opening day probably isn't the best gauge.
Watching from the safety of Kilroy's, I would guess Paddy O's might have been off by 10% or a little more. They were still busy, but on other opening days Paddy O's is completely insane with a dull roar coming from the area along with wall to wall people standing in front. Yesterday they were still crazy, but maybe not quite as crazy as other opening days.

But you're right: let's wait until a weekday May game against a "meh" opponent to see how the crowds shift.

414
Full MemberFull Member
414

PostApr 08, 2014#1368

Bill Dewitt was on 920 CBS sports and said that condos around BPV are next but that they won't be moving fast on those

933
Super MemberSuper Member
933

PostApr 08, 2014#1369

Knowitall wrote:Bill Dewitt was on 920 CBS sports and said that condos around BPV are next but that they won't be moving fast on those
Big mistake.

Need to get started on those ASAP.

641
Senior MemberSenior Member
641

PostApr 08, 2014#1370

Why is it a mistake?

8,155
Life MemberLife Member
8,155

PostApr 08, 2014#1371

STLEnginerd wrote: I keep thinking they need to add some roof top batting cages...
^ awesome idea... that would kill with both adults and kids. That could be part of my boutique hotel vision. If not at BPV, maybe atop a surrounding building, but that is the type of attractor that can keep people downtown and spend their $$.

516
Senior MemberSenior Member
516

PostApr 08, 2014#1372

moorlander wrote:I've only heard very positive reviews from friends both first hand and via social media.
My initial thoughts:

1. The center area with the big screen is pretty cool. Great place to watch any type of sporting event. Should do very well.
2. The Budweiser Brew House and the Cardinals Nation bar/restaurant can probably do well based on 81 home games alone, but that's low hanging fruit. Other than their location next to the stadium on a game day, there's really nothing that would draw me to these venues on a non-game day. Cardinals Nation seems like a more touristy version of Mike Shannons. The upstairs of the Brew House wants to be some sort of high-end club/lounge, which isn't my scene.
3. PBR is interesting. It should do well initially due to curiosity and the dancers wearing ass-less chaps. The bar is actually owned by Cordish and I would not be surprised if every 5-10 years it gets switched out with another Cordish-owned themed bar to keep things fresh.
4. We already have other piano bars in the city so Howl at the Moon is nothing new. However, the best craft beer selection in BPV is found there.

I don't want to be a Debbie Downer, but overall, I do worry that some vacancies will develop unless the rest of BPV gets built relatively soon.

7,810
Life MemberLife Member
7,810

PostApr 08, 2014#1373

south compton wrote:4. We already have other piano bars in the city so Howl at the Moon is nothing new.
Big Bang closed like 12 or 18 months ago and supposedly Howl bought out Jive & Wail. So they now have the downtown market cornered on drunk bachelorettes parties squealing out "Margaritaville" inbetween their sipping from their foofoo drinks through penis shaped straws.

2,093
Life MemberLife Member
2,093

PostApr 08, 2014#1374

dweebe wrote:[ So they now have the downtown market cornered on drunk bachelorettes parties squealing out "Margaritaville" inbetween their sipping from their foofoo drinks through penis shaped straws.
Ah yes, the highly coveted woo girl demo.

267
Full MemberFull Member
267

PostApr 08, 2014#1375

midcoaststl wrote:I went down for opening day and really enjoyed myself.

Is it generic and mall like? Yeah, but it is a party zone for game day. And it does a great job with that. For example, the TV's in the Brew-house show the live feed from the stadium, so you hear everything that they hear in the stadium (including scoreboard stuff like the cap dance, kiss cam etc. No commercials).

The group that I was with, really enjoyed this, because it felt like we were actually at the game. The food at Brew House was tasty and service was good, even though the place was crazy packed.

And yes, each venue, has its own outside entrance.

I think it will do great on game day. I think it will be a hit with tourists who go to the hall of fame museum and grab a bite or drink after. AND I think an occasional city lover will venture in and enjoy it like I did!

In my opinion, the other bars (Mike Shannons) had plenty of people and were still packed during the game. As it was said before, Cities are supposed to have something for everyone, including visitors and suburbanites....

And here is the real shocker. I went in and thought I would HATE the PBR bar, but it was actually a lot of fun. Good music (country, hip hop, rock, etc) and the eye candy was an added plus.

Will BPV, replace my favorite places in the city, no, but I will be back for big games and may even watch the blues Playoffs there...

Yeah I have no doubt it will make money and that tons of people will enjoy it. It sounds like they built in some pretty cool effects for gameday experiences. I'll probably have fun there too when I'm able to grab a drink in there next time.

I'm just saying (for the probably 1000th time someone has noted this on this thread) that it doesn't have greatest urban design to generate active and interesting street life. The venues, in my opinion, are fine for a fan zone. In terms of the urban design though, it wouldn't matter much at all what types of bars/restaurants were in there. It's great that downtown will have more spots for non-urban locals and tourists to enjoy. That doesn't mean the development had to have been non-urban in design though. Hopefully future phases will be more urban in design to maximize that location and the benefit for the city.

Read more posts (4281 remaining)