641
Senior MemberSenior Member
641

PostOct 01, 2013#76

i know several St. Louisans who work in "national media" on the East Coast...I would be that's what is fueling these articles.

4,489
Super ModeratorSuper Moderator
4,489

PostOct 01, 2013#77

sirshankalot wrote:i know several St. Louisans who work in "national media" on the East Coast...I would be that's what is fueling these articles.
Jim Suhr is an AP (Associated Press) writer based in St. Louis. He wrote the story originally posted by tbspqr.

When an Associated Press writer reports a story from a particular region the story usually goes across news feeds and news wires. If a newspaper, website, television news outlet etc. is connected to the AP feed or wire, that particular media outlet can choose to report the story.

This story has nothing to do with East Coast St. Louisans making this story viral.

This story is newsworthy for media outlets because ADM is a big company that any city would want. What makes it more interesting is that St. Louis is taking on its bigger Midwest rival - big-bad Chicago for this company.

1,982
Never Logs OffNever Logs Off
1,982

PostOct 01, 2013#78

Whatever made it viral, that does answer the question that it's coming from St. Louis, and perhaps that's the reason the Cubs-Cards rivalry makes the article. Wish the answer was something else. I'd love someone to tell me that the personal whims of the board are just as likely to influence the decision as the actual business factors.

Maybe that is still the case, though.

752
Super MemberSuper Member
752

PostOct 01, 2013#79

http://stlouis.cbslocal.com/2013/09/30/ ... -st-louis/

National Agriculture Groups Urge ADM to Move to St. Louis
Michael Calhoun (@michaelcalhoun, mrcalhoun@cbs.com)
September 30, 2013 8:36 AM

"ST. LOUIS (KMOX) - Corn and soybeans are among the biggest businesses for Archer Daniels Midland Co. and the organizations that represent farmers of both are urging ADM to move its headquarters to St. Louis."

good:

"“We also are really at the center of the innovation that’s going on here in biotechnology and biology,” he said. “St. Louis really is the center of the Bio-Belt.” "


but possibly biased: "Both associations are based in the St. Louis area. "

8,155
Life MemberLife Member
8,155

PostOct 01, 2013#80

If this is all they are asking, Chicago is going to get the global HQ:

http://www.stltoday.com/business/local/ ... 3c1a5.html

4,489
Super ModeratorSuper Moderator
4,489

PostOct 01, 2013#81

jstriebel wrote:Whatever made it viral, that does answer the question that it's coming from St. Louis, and perhaps that's the reason the Cubs-Cards rivalry makes the article. Wish the answer was something else. I'd love someone to tell me that the personal whims of the board are just as likely to influence the decision as the actual business factors.

Maybe that is still the case, though.
Two different things. The story was written by an AP writer who happens to be based in St. Louis.

Neither he nor St. Louisans "on the East Coast" made the story go viral as suggested. The story went viral because news media felt it was newsworthy to publish.

AP writers write stories about St. Louis often, but only a low percentage go viral.

And what's the big deal anyway? The story has to start somewhere.

PostOct 01, 2013#82

roger wyoming II wrote:If this is all they are asking, Chicago is going to get the global HQ:

http://www.stltoday.com/business/local/ ... 3c1a5.html
ADM very well could end up in Chicago, but I believe $20-million is what ADM is putting on the table to start the bidding war.

Let the bidding begin!

Maybe $20-million is really all they want, but what if it isn't? Missouri/St. Louis could match that easily. For example, if Missouri puts out $50-million..............how could ADM refuse that? If Minneapolis/Minnesota puts out $65-million etc. etc.

Then again, SEARS settled in Chicago after reportedly receiving an offer of $400-million in incentives from Ohio.

2,925
Life MemberLife Member
2,925

PostOct 01, 2013#83

$20MM seems like a reasonable starting point to contest this. I wonder just how much IL can put together, noting as the AP article did state that the State of IL is around $100B (with a B) in the red. We must consider that, just by matching what IL does, MO doesn't necessarily have the upper hand. STL's & MO's economic development teams, I'm sure, are putting together something that they think can win over ADM for more than just dollars. And I'm sure these conversations are going on very quietly, as no one wants a high-profile bidding contest that'll provoke animosity.

The Cardinals-Cubs rivalry thing does play in here, and I think it's not only funny but great. When we complain about all the companies moving into West County because that's where the corporate execs live, we should also celebrate that our City's sports culture could help pull out a victory for our economy.

Indeed, the promotion & continuation of the corporate culture within ADM is a significant concern of the company's executive leadership when considering a relocation. Yes, they want a City where they can transition their employees to a location where both spouses can be gainfully employed, and which has a more global feel than Central IL. But, would moving to Downtown Chicago accomplish this while maintaining the feel that the rest of the company has within Decatur? Or would locating in Downtown Chicago be a heavy culture shock? Would they want to build up in the outer Chicago suburbs? Would moving to STL be a smoother transition for the corporate culture's continuation? Lots for them to consider here...

Personally, I really like sirshankalot's proposal, to encourage ADM to consider the Metro East, keeping the company in IL while making them a part of the STL Metro Area. That would really be a victory for everyone involved (other than the City of Chicago). My only concerns are that this may not be that feasible, as I don't have much faith in the Powers-That-Be in the Metro East to pull off something as substantial as a corporate relocation of this size. Maybe the RCGA/STL Regional Chamber could pursue this as a side strategy...

Last night, I was looking at the AT&T Tower sticking up from the neighborhood, and I started thinking about what it would look like with Archer Daniels Midland printed across the top of it. Who knows, it's theoretically possible. While I still believe Chicago has the upper hand for its business climate (and for the wacky political machine that is IL to subsidize this), I do believe STL is very much in the running.

PostOct 02, 2013#84

Update: The $20MM "ADM Bill" has been introduced to the IL House Revenue and Finance Committee, not for a vote but strictly for an introduction. Immediately, it started taking hits...
You’re asking us to change the tax policy to give a leg up to this particular corporation... (ADM) essentially is blackmailing the state.
- Representative Barbara Flynn Currie (D-Chicago)
Source: http://www.suntimes.com/news/22911105-4 ... ption.html

The GOP response was equally as chilly. One State Rep, David McSweeney (R-Cary), asked ADM to join his efforts to reduce the State's taxes on corporations, which I'm sure ADM would appreciate but I doubt ADM would fully involve itself, as this sounds like a jumping-off point for partisan positioning within their General Assembly.

Meanwhile, Zurick Insurance Group's North American HQ in suburban Chicago is also seeking funding from the same tax credit source (EDGE) that is being positioned for ADM. Zurick's relocating, but only within Schaumburg.

Both ADM and Zurick are seeking these tax credits to be allocated differently from how they were written to perform. Based on Roger Wyoming's previous story link, ADM appears to be seeking their tax credit's shelf life of $1.2MM annually to be extended from 15 years to 20 years, because some years they may not owe enough to capitalize on the whole thing. Zurich, meanwhile, wants the tax credit to count not just to its owed corporate state income taxes (which will be under their allocations) but to reflect as well on the premiums the company pays the State as an insurance carrier.

Takeaway: The State of Illinois is pursuing it, and this "frosty" reception may not mean much when it comes down to whether or not to make a final allocation. Still, this is a rough intro to save the company, especially when there's competition for the funding. Same time, if IL does allocate to both ADM and Zurick, well, I'm personally going to be extra worried that the entire State will run out of money, possibly to the point of default, even ahead of their current pace.

Addendum: Should ADM receive this tax credit, it would apply to any corporate HQ of theirs anywhere in IL, not just Chicago. Sirshankalot's idea of a Metro East HQ for the company remains feasible.

4,489
Super ModeratorSuper Moderator
4,489

PostOct 02, 2013#85

I sure hope the attitudes of some legislators in Illinois make ADM think twice about their St. Louis option. St. Louis wants the company, but they too have to put their money where their mouths are....first.

Illinois would lose a corporate headquarters, but maintain 4,400 jobs in Decatur. Those jobs aren't going anywhere because there's simply too much infrastructure in Decatur, Illinois. I don't think the Metro East is doing anything to lure ADM. All I've heard are crickets.

As much as I would like to see the ADM relocation to metro St. Louis, I'd rather see ADM in Chicago than some region like Houston, Dallas or Atlanta. Illinois needs to play nice before ADM decides to move out of the Midwest - if the price is right.

Here are some maps of ADM's assets and offices nearest each city.

ADM-Assets


Chicago


St. Louis

10K
AdministratorAdministrator
10K

PostOct 02, 2013#86

This whole thing seems like kind of a waste of time for STL.

4,553
Life MemberLife Member
4,553

PostOct 02, 2013#87

^I hear ya. But if anything it'll help the RCGA and local dignitaries get organized and come up with a framework for making structured incentive offers to companies that are shopping for a new HQ. Whatever they come up with for ADM will help them have a starting point going forward for how to make viable offers to lure migratory managements and boards of directors.

4,489
Super ModeratorSuper Moderator
4,489

PostOct 02, 2013#88

debaliviere wrote:This whole thing seems like kind of a waste of time for STL.
How so? Why so glum? I'm surprised by your responses.

Question: Why shouldn't local leadership and organizations at least pursue ADM- even if the odds seem tilted towards Chicago? Why roll over and die?

The way I see it, if STL regional leadership and organizations were not pursuing ADM, there'd be complaints from the community that not enough was being done to land the headquarters win. If STL does win, then people are going see that it was worth the effort.

Even if St. Louis' loses, so be it. Sometimes you have to lose and lose again before you win.

8,155
Life MemberLife Member
8,155

PostOct 02, 2013#89

^ I agree. It can test/gain experience for the supposed greater cooperation between city and county on econ. devo. Might as well spin the wheels.

PostOct 02, 2013#90

wabash wrote:^I hear ya. But if anything it'll help the RCGA and local dignitaries get organized and come up with a framework for making structured incentive offers to companies that are shopping for a new HQ. Whatever they come up with for ADM will help them have a starting point going forward for how to make viable offers to lure migratory managements and boards of directors.
wabash, we gotta get 'em to Crown Candy and Ted Drewe's!

142
Junior MemberJunior Member
142

PostOct 04, 2013#91

KMOX reports both Monsanto and the Danforth Plant Science Center are reaching out to ADM and encouraging the firm to move to St. Louis.


Link: http://goo.gl/ohyDJC

1,320
Veteran MemberVeteran Member
1,320

PostOct 04, 2013#92

^
Governor Pat Quinn said Friday he will not support the company’s request for $24 dollars worth of incentives.
Illinois is really in the hole. :wink:

788
Super MemberSuper Member
788

PostOct 04, 2013#93

Yeah, whoever wrote that didn't proof read.
“If the ADM leadership wants to take some top clients to see baseball in October, they should probably live here and not in St. Louis,” he added.

4,489
Super ModeratorSuper Moderator
4,489

PostOct 04, 2013#94

ADM's Board of Directors has three definite St. Louis connections out of the 11 Board members.


Patrick J. Moore- A native-Chicagoan who lives in St. Louis.From 2002 until 2011, Moore was chairman and chief executive officer of suburban Creve Coeur, Missouri-based Smurfit-Stone Container Corporation (formerly Jefferson Smurfit Corporation), a producer of containerboard and corrugated packaging and one of the world’s largest paper recyclers. Moore serves on the North American Review Board of American Air Liquide Holdings, Inc. and on the boards of the Metropolitan YMCA of St. Louis, St. Louis-based Boys Hope/Girls Hope, St. Louis Zoological Society and the Big Shoulders Fund.


Kelvin L. Westbrook - Westbrook serves as a director of Camden Property Trust, Commerce Bank (St. Louis) N.A., Stifel Financial Corp.(St. Louis), the National Cable Satellite Corporation (C-SPAN), BJC HealthCare (St. Louis), St. Louis Children’s Hospital, the St. Louis Internship Program and The Municipal Theatre Association of St. Louis (The Muny). He also serves on the Washington University School of Medicine National Council and the Business Program Advisory Council of Harris-Stowe State University (St. Louis).

He received a bachelor’s degree in business administration from the University of Washington in 1977 and a doctoral degree from Harvard Law School in 1982. He was also a founder of St. Louis-based Millennium Digital Media, which became Broadstripe - now based in Dallas.


Terrell K. Crews - Crews served as CEO of St. Louis-based Monsanto vegetable division from August 2008 until his retirement. He served as Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Vegetable Business CEO for Monsanto Company, from 2007 to 2009, and Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer from 2000 to 2007.

194
Junior MemberJunior Member
194

PostOct 05, 2013#95

This is really only 100 jobs. It's just a "small, corporate team." Asking Illinois for $20MM in tax breaks for 100 jobs is kind of absurd. That's $200,000 per job. How many years will it take to make that back via personal income tax?

Anyhow, 100 jobs isn't nearly enough to fill up the AT&T building. I'm thinking if they do move here, it might be a new place in BPV. Of course, they could be like an anchor tenant in the AT&T building and have other corps. fill it out. How many workers does the AT&T building support? It's huge...I could see it fitting a couple thousand. If they moved there, they'd really only be leasing 5% of the space or less. It's more likely they go to Met Square.

1,320
Veteran MemberVeteran Member
1,320

PostOct 05, 2013#96

Just a guess, but if they wanted to house 100 executive jobs -- with the spacious lobbies and conference rooms that go with a Fortune 500 corporate headquarters -- plus another 100 IT jobs, then you might be looking at 90,000 s.f. ... or the top three floors of the AT&T building. And a giant ADM sign on top.

4,553
Life MemberLife Member
4,553

PostOct 05, 2013#97

Or Centene phase II

512
Senior MemberSenior Member
512

PostOct 06, 2013#98

Yeah, Illinois' leadership (and now Tribune's Phil Rosenthal) have the right idea regarding ADM's request for tax incentives.

Chicago doesn't need to offer them and the state of Illinois probably shouldn't reaffirm the precedent by doing so. Illinois will still be home to most of ADM's employees and, presumably, the vast majority of ADM's taxable revenue.

That then begs the question, why should St. Louis offer them? If there was a promise that the roughly 5,000 Decatur jobs would eventually move to Missouri, then yeah -- you pony up the dough. In that case though, Illinois sure as hell does so too. And if Missouri does clear the way for tax credits, who's to say ADM doesn't do what so many others have done and set up shop in Clayton or Westport?

All in all, I'd surprised if the decision was made based on one state giving up more than the other. But it's a dangerous precedent to set without some assured outcomes vis-a-vis long-term commitments and employment transfers. And frankly, St. Louis and Missouri haven't shown a particular aptitude for demanding specific returns from the tax breaks they offer -- just look at "negotiations" locally with McKee, the Cardinals, the Rams, etc.

123
Junior MemberJunior Member
123

PostOct 06, 2013#99

I think we should do what it takes to get ADM to move their Global HQ to STL. Even though it might not make good dollar and sense it would be great for our image and we will build on the success to increase our corporate agriculture and corporate density. Increased employees, increased flights from private airports or Lambert is increased tax dollars. I say $1 million a year in tax breaks it worth it to get a great company to move. It is rare that we have this opportunity to get an international brand.

4,489
Super ModeratorSuper Moderator
4,489

PostOct 07, 2013#100

Kevin B wrote:Yeah, Illinois' leadership (and now Tribune's Phil Rosenthal) have the right idea regarding ADM's request for tax incentives.

Chicago doesn't need to offer them and the state of Illinois probably shouldn't reaffirm the precedent by doing so. Illinois will still be home to most of ADM's employees and, presumably, the vast majority of ADM's taxable revenue.

That then begs the question, why should St. Louis offer them? If there was a promise that the roughly 5,000 Decatur jobs would eventually move to Missouri, then yeah -- you pony up the dough. In that case though, Illinois sure as hell does so too. And if Missouri does clear the way for tax credits, who's to say ADM doesn't do what so many others have done and set up shop in Clayton or Westport?

All in all, I'd surprised if the decision was made based on one state giving up more than the other. But it's a dangerous precedent to set without some assured outcomes vis-a-vis long-term commitments and employment transfers. And frankly, St. Louis and Missouri haven't shown a particular aptitude for demanding specific returns from the tax breaks they offer -- just look at "negotiations" locally with McKee, the Cardinals, the Rams, etc.
The Cardinals, Rams, and Northside TIF are totally different animals, in my opinion. Let's look at Express Scripts, Monsanto, Mastercard, CitiMortage, GM, Boeing etc. as better examples.

Neither St. Louis nor Missouri would give tax breaks and incentives without a job creation component attached. Missouri would not give $20-million for 100 jobs. Also, Decatur has only 4,400 - not 5,000. But if ADM did agree to create 300-500 jobs in Missouri plus the international headquarters in St. Louis, I also could see that working. I could see the Decatur, Illinois shrinking by 300-500 jobs, unless ADM was to create actual new jobs.

Next to Cargill, ADM is a global ag powerhouse. Why not pay for it, get some guarantees and added regional/economic prestige for St. Louis and Missouri. Further, I wouldn't care where they would locate in the region - just come.

Read more posts (50 remaining)