549
Senior MemberSenior Member
549

PostFeb 03, 2009#126

^:lol:^



How big of a trophy? Are we talking a little participation trophy like kids get for playing soccer, or we talking a huge gaudy bowling trophy that's four feet tall? Either way, I say give them trophies, medals, ribbons, plaques, whatever. All of them. But wait until the thing is built. When are they planning to start construction anyway?

11K
Life MemberLife Member
11K

PostFeb 03, 2009#127

I was thinking of something like this:







This did get me thinking . . . Urban StL should hand out virtual trophies for various urban accomplishments/abominations each year. Perhaps the RFT would pick it up!

549
Senior MemberSenior Member
549

PostFeb 03, 2009#128

Grover wrote:
This did get me thinking . . . Urban StL should hand out virtual trophies for various urban accomplishments/abominations each year. Perhaps the RFT would pick it up!


Good idea. Have a list of projects completed in a given year with a couple different categories and have a vote on the best/worst. I like it.

1,877
Never Logs OffNever Logs Off
1,877

PostFeb 03, 2009#129

Grover wrote:I was thinking of something like this:








Oh, come on now. You and I both know that the powers that be will never let any project come to fruition that would be worthy of a trophy of that magnitude. This isn't Chicago or New York, you know.



-RBB

8,910
Life MemberLife Member
8,910

PostFeb 16, 2009#130

Next to the wheel, the Rodgers Group is planning on building an office building, where it will relocate its headquarters, and restaurant space.


What do we know about this building that will be part of the ferris wheel development. What do we know about the Rodgers Group? How many employees will they be bringing to the Landing?

241
Junior MemberJunior Member
241

PostMar 02, 2009#131

Found an update on downtownstlbiz:





The city has granted $3.4 million in tax increment financing for the $11.7 million project.



Adjacent to the Ferris wheel, the Rodgers Group plans on building an office building and restaurant space.



The office building will house the Rodgers Group’s headquarters, relocated from Clayton.



The Rodgers Group is projecting that 460,000 people would ride the wheel each year, bringing in $4.25 million in revenue annually.







Hey, the very mention of a Clayton company's intention to move to downtown St Louis makes me sit up and take notice!

11K
Life MemberLife Member
11K

PostMar 03, 2009#132

I don't get why, with a projected income and development cost like this that TIF money is needed. Seems ridiculous. Am I missing something?

6,662
AdministratorAdministrator
6,662

PostMar 03, 2009#133

^Ask and you shall receive.

4,553
Life MemberLife Member
4,553

PostMar 03, 2009#134

That comes out to an average of $9.24 per rider. Which seems a bit steep. Especially considering that adults are probably more than children and seniors. Do these things work like movie theaters? I have no idea.



The office and restaurant space sounds great. This all sounds like a great mix for the landing.

8,910
Life MemberLife Member
8,910

PostMar 03, 2009#135

so where exactly is the giant wheel going to go?

241
Junior MemberJunior Member
241

PostMar 03, 2009#136

^Here's an artist's rendering of the wheel and it's intended site:

http://skywheelstl.com/pdf/STLtoday_Bel ... _wheel.pdf

11K
Life MemberLife Member
11K

PostMar 03, 2009#137

^ What's really fascinating here is that the financing came from overseas and no St. Louis area bank would touch it (according to the P-D story). So either STL area banks know the local market and are being smartly conservative or they're too blind to see a positive opportunity on their front lawn. Sound like a familar argument anyone?

6,775
Life MemberLife Member
6,775

PostMar 03, 2009#138

Or, more likely, financing for things like ferris wheels is very specialized, and no local (or American, perhaps) bank has the expertise to evaluate the risk.

5,433
Super ModeratorSuper Moderator
5,433

PostMar 03, 2009#139

Grover wrote:^ What's really fascinating here is that the financing came from overseas and no St. Louis area bank would touch it (according to the P-D story). So either STL area banks know the local market and are being smartly conservative or they're too blind to see a positive opportunity on their front lawn. Sound like a familar argument anyone?


Both of those scenarios are certainly possible, but I think TCS may be right about the specialized nature of a loan like this. Also, I know of multiple loft developers that are turning to HUD-backed loans and switching their development plans to rentals from condos as they have had trouble finding financing for the latter just about anywhere, so in this economy it's really hard to say why the developers couldn't find local (or American) financing.

549
Senior MemberSenior Member
549

PostMar 03, 2009#140

Regardless of where the financing is coming from or why, I'm glad they got it.



Does anyone know when they are going to start construction? In my opinion, it seems imperative that they get this thing built in time for the All Star game; and considering this is essentially a kit of parts, that doesn't seem out of the question.

5,705
Life MemberLife Member
5,705

PostMar 03, 2009#141

The kit of parts, a good description of what the ferris wheel actually consists of, is probably part of the financing package. The financer simply demands the kit of parts back if payments can't be maintained. I wouldn't be surprised if the kit builder has an agreement with the financer themselves. However, the owner or ourselves won't be privy to it.



It is not uncommon to have equipment financed differently. Caterpillar will offer financing on its own marine engines when packages are put together for new ships. In other words, the financing is outside of the banks because large companies like Caterpillar want to encourage their equipment instead of an EMD used.

2,929
Life MemberLife Member
2,929

PostMar 03, 2009#142

The Central Scrutinizer wrote:Or, more likely, financing for things like ferris wheels is very specialized, and no local (or American, perhaps) bank has the expertise to evaluate the risk.
Spot on. The uniqueness of such a facility required specialized underwriting that is very industry-specific, from initial facility construction to ongoing maintenance & risk assessments. I remember reading how the bank sponsoring the project is an industry specialist with a global clientele & client book of like facilities being sponsored. While everyone would have liked for a StL-based firm to have conducted the underwriting, such a deal was and is feasibly impossible.



Beware StL-specific pessimism in all its forms, including under the auspices of calling it out on others. I read in a book somewhere about not calling out your neighbor for the splinter in his eye while ignoring the plank in one's own. Pretty sure it was Horton Hears A Who.

1,364
Veteran MemberVeteran Member
1,364

PostMar 03, 2009#143

I'm looking forward to this.

3,429
Life MemberLife Member
3,429

PostMar 28, 2009#144

I suggested a ferris wheel for the Bottle District a couple of years ago. But I like the Landing location even better.



http://www.urbanstl.com/viewtopic.php?p=78419#78419

PostMay 27, 2009#145

Speaking of the Landing, what's going on with the Observation Wheel? Let met guess -- they lost their funding?

1,026
Expert MemberExpert Member
1,026

PostMay 27, 2009#146

so is this project a definite go? and I'm a bit confused. Whats the difference between an "observation wheel" and a Ferris wheel? Sounds like the same thing to me. ....



I'm a bit flummoxed at this project. I want it and thinks its cool - but is anyone really going to pay more than 5 bucks to ride a giant Ferris wheel. We'll see I guess.



Just a thought - but I could see this working quite well with the casino. Think about it. You get free Ferris wheel comps from the casino. Casino sends them a steady stream of business and gains a "unique" experience for its customers. It could really make the casino stand out.

11K
Life MemberLife Member
11K

PostMay 27, 2009#147

markofucity wrote:I'm a bit confused. Whats the difference between an "observation wheel" and a Ferris wheel?


The same difference as a "disc" and a "Frisbee".

549
Senior MemberSenior Member
549

PostMay 27, 2009#148

Grover wrote:
markofucity wrote:I'm a bit confused. Whats the difference between an "observation wheel" and a Ferris wheel?


The same difference as a "disc" and a "Frisbee".


It has always seemed to me (and it's probably doesn't hold too much truth but seems reasonable) that context is what's important to the differentiation. A wheel in a amusement park/carnival is a Ferris wheel, but the same wheel standing alone and without surrounding rides becomes an observation wheel.



But yeah, there really isn't a difference.

12K
Life MemberLife Member
12K

PostMay 28, 2009#149

"Ferris Wheels" are so 20th Century.

6,775
Life MemberLife Member
6,775

PostMay 28, 2009#150

markofucity wrote:so is this project a definite go? and I'm a bit confused. Whats the difference between an "observation wheel" and a Ferris wheel? Sounds like the same thing to me. ....


I just learned this weekend the difference between a cemetary and a burial ground. :)

Read more posts (47 remaining)