1,465
Veteran MemberVeteran Member
1,465

PostAug 11, 2022#51

PeterXCV wrote:
Aug 10, 2022
imran wrote:
Aug 10, 2022
So Lux Living are not completely evil and did something right here?
What say you, defenders of an architectural free-for-all?
I don't think Lux Living developed these did they?
From page 1 of this thread….
F40FC4D4-EAFB-447D-A55C-2F7585814C31.jpeg (168.49KiB)

488
Full MemberFull Member
488

PostAug 11, 2022#52

alexstl wrote:
Aug 11, 2022
GoHarvOrGoHome wrote:
Aug 10, 2022
I.... like this building? Sure it's fairly odd compared to its surroundings, but that could be solved by building another 2-3 of these in the empty lot next door. STL needs more dense little infill projects like this.
I feel like density doesn't have to be awkward and out of scale. There are plenty of other townhouse projects in the CWE that blend into the neighborhood completely fine.
You should travel to Houston or really anywhere in Texas.  They have worse versions of this project everywhere and their cities seems just fine. 

1,465
Veteran MemberVeteran Member
1,465

PostAug 11, 2022#53

I knew there was a reason I would never live in Texas… 😊

34
New MemberNew Member
34

PostAug 11, 2022#54

alexstl wrote:
GoHarvOrGoHome wrote:
Aug 10, 2022
I.... like this building? Sure it's fairly odd compared to its surroundings, but that could be solved by building another 2-3 of these in the empty lot next door. STL needs more dense little infill projects like this.
I feel like density doesn't have to be awkward and out of scale. There are plenty of other townhouse projects in the CWE that blend into the neighborhood completely fine.
People can move to a planned community if they want to live in a area that “blends” with its surroundings.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

1,101
Expert MemberExpert Member
1,101

PostAug 11, 2022#55

I mean if Lux Living is involved I worry how well built these are but they are for sale, not for rent so maybe they won't be as shoddy. 

Anyway, I like these actually. Also, I think they compare favorably to the several postmodern townhouse complexes in the Central West End. Like 4235 West Pine just to the west, 4444 Lindell, 4453 West Pine, 4525 Laclede, etc. This one adds density to a narrow lot without sacrificing street activation the way those do, there's no curb cut either. 

13K
Life MemberLife Member
13K

PostAug 11, 2022#56

Have you tried looking at its website to clear up this mystery?

1,101
Expert MemberExpert Member
1,101

PostAug 11, 2022#57

Fine Richard, I'm stupid, you win. https://westvillage-stl.com/team/

1,465
Veteran MemberVeteran Member
1,465

PostAug 11, 2022#58

Mapguy wrote:
Aug 11, 2022
alexstl wrote:
GoHarvOrGoHome wrote:
Aug 10, 2022
I.... like this building? Sure it's fairly odd compared to its surroundings, but that could be solved by building another 2-3 of these in the empty lot next door. STL needs more dense little infill projects like this.
I feel like density doesn't have to be awkward and out of scale. There are plenty of other townhouse projects in the CWE that blend into the neighborhood completely fine.
People can move to a planned community if they want to live in a area that “blends” with its surroundings.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Think you’d be hard-pressed to find a US community that has not been planned - granted some more poorly than others.

Jk aside, setback and proportion rules don’t immediately = cookie cutter blandness.

73
New MemberNew Member
73

PostAug 12, 2022#59

Jeez y'all can I just say I dislike the way a building looks without being passive-aggressively accused of NIMBYism with smug comments? Yes, I'm aware density is good for neighborhoods and that Saint Louis should be building more housing, I just don't care for these townhouses.

Read more posts (-16 remaining)