12K
Life MemberLife Member
12K

PostFeb 01, 2020#11

They're moving fast on these. Foundation work is well underway. 

2,481
Life MemberLife Member
2,481

PostAug 21, 2020#12




210
Junior MemberJunior Member
210

PostAug 21, 2020#13

Will the surface parking lot just to the east stay?

2,481
Life MemberLife Member
2,481

PostAug 21, 2020#14

MarkGroth2020 wrote:
Aug 21, 2020
Will the surface parking lot just to the east stay?
The surface lot is west of this building. And it's owned by the same entity that owns the two office buildings west of Walgreen's on Lindell, Helix Realty. So, it will likely remain a surface lot until those properties are redeveloped.

5,705
Life MemberLife Member
5,705

PostAug 22, 2020#15

I guess another way to put the question about the parking lot is as follows.   Does the parking lot itself get a lot of use or does it look like the owner is sitting on the property for the right opportunity to come along?   

The townhouse development with its vertical use of space might provide an opportunity for developing parking along similar lines and or the developer a means to support the buyout price if these townhouses sell well.  

5,261
Life MemberLife Member
5,261

PostAug 31, 2020#16

Today...



PostSep 24, 2020#17

Today..


1,465
Veteran MemberVeteran Member
1,465

PostOct 05, 2020#18

The height of this seems off compared to the streetscape. Correct scale and proportion are everything. Don’t think they got it right. Maybe the exterior finishes will help to visually mitigate this.

2,481
Life MemberLife Member
2,481

PostOct 05, 2020#19

imran wrote:
Oct 05, 2020
The height of this seems off compared to the streetscape. Correct scale and proportion are everything. Don’t think they got it right. Maybe the exterior finishes will help to visually mitigate this.
It does seem taller than the rendering. I'd guess they didn't bury the garage quite as deep to save $, or they didn't have enough room for the ramp off the alley...

3,762
Life MemberLife Member
3,762

PostOct 05, 2020#20

^^ it's not so much the height that I find awkward but the orientation. "just turn it 90 degrees and cram it in there!"

2,481
Life MemberLife Member
2,481

PostOct 05, 2020#21

urban_dilettante wrote:
Oct 05, 2020
^^ it's not so much the height that I find awkward but the orientation. "just turn it 90 degrees and cram it in there!"
Now, now, don't judge the building for it's orientation...🙂  And BTW, I do believe TWSS.

But yes, it's too bad they couldn't work out a land swap with the parking lot owner to get a nice streetscape with the parking lot buried in the alley.

2,929
Life MemberLife Member
2,929

PostOct 12, 2020#22

How much will this building prompt a near-term development of the parking lot next door into a building, perhaps at a similar height as the West Village Townhomes? Have to think that the building's height relative to its neighbors was a conscious decision related to further construction down the line. That said, all I have is speculation, I think reasonable, but without any firm insight. 

9,558
Life MemberLife Member
9,558

PostOct 13, 2020#23

This recent (last 25 years) home construction quality in America absolutely sucks.    These suck. Everything in Shaw that UIC does sucks. All the crap in st.Charles sucks

296
Full MemberFull Member
296

PostOct 13, 2020#24

delete

1,465
Veteran MemberVeteran Member
1,465

PostJan 04, 2021#25

From Schnucks strip mall parking lot
3D736563-E46A-4073-9136-0DD7BFD95E7E.jpeg (2.37MiB)

13K
Life MemberLife Member
13K

PostMar 14, 2021#26

4201 West Pine West Village 2021-03-13 .jpg (1008.85KiB)

1,465
Veteran MemberVeteran Member
1,465

PostNov 28, 2021#27

What could have been; a comparison.
3AE8E60E-A50E-4494-8194-2B124E6A29F8.jpeg (153.51KiB)
4052C8A0-8FA5-4A9B-83A7-D034863B3802.jpeg (105.91KiB)

953
Super MemberSuper Member
953

PostNov 28, 2021#28

Oh goodness it looks like a dormitory or some sort of office structure

443
Full MemberFull Member
443

PostNov 28, 2021#29

Whats the problem?

1,101
Expert MemberExpert Member
1,101

PostNov 28, 2021#30

Would the Hawthorne have been built with this logic? I assume in the 1920s the 4400 block of West Pine was just mansions. 

1,465
Veteran MemberVeteran Member
1,465

PostNov 29, 2021#31

PeterXCV wrote:
Nov 28, 2021
Would the Hawthorne have been built with this logic? I assume in the 1920s the 4400 block of West Pine was just mansions. 
This project is not an apartment tower. I think it falls in the category of missing middle housing. When done right, missing middle visually blends into neighborhoods while expanding housing options beyond single family lots.

That entire front facing west pine is ONE housing unit. And it’s ?40% taller than the fourplex next door. How can any of you not see the obvious bloat here?

991
Super MemberSuper Member
991

PostNov 29, 2021#32

Is that just an unflattering angle? Would love to see a photo from the opposite way / a few different perspectives.

805
Super MemberSuper Member
805

PostNov 29, 2021#33

Laife Fulk wrote:Is that just an unflattering angle? Would love to see a photo from the opposite way / a few different perspectives.

Here’s another angle


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

1,465
Veteran MemberVeteran Member
1,465

PostNov 29, 2021#34

Laife Fulk wrote:
Nov 29, 2021
Is that just an unflattering angle? Would love to see a photo from the opposite way / a few different perspectives.
Yes the primary facade facing the street is one of its most unflattering aspects. It would probably look better up close and from the east where you can’t easily tell the height difference.

4,553
Life MemberLife Member
4,553

PostNov 29, 2021#35

It definitely sticks out from the surrounding style and scale, but I like it for that reason. I think the eccentricity, variety and contrast works here. It's nice that there's some more contemporary looking projects being sprinkled into the eastern CWE like Artizen, 4101 Laclede and this project. Using actual white brick would have been a nice touch. 

Read more posts (34 remaining)