Agreed about the interior of Dorsa. I love it, in its space-age-fantasy glory, and it needs to be preserved as is. All those wonderful lines and smooth edges, like Tomorrowland in St. Louis! The deco stylings of the exterior facade make so much more sense when the interior area is added to the context. It is unique and, while not original, is important to the history of the building and that of the Washington Avenue garment/fashion industry, imo, as it captures a moment in that heritage.
Also: I might be wrong (and, someone please tell me if I am), but the name Dorsa... doesn't that refer to the business that inhabited the building during its "art deco"/mid-20th Century guise? Is Dorsa that original name of the building or occupants? I'm not under the impression that it is, but if Dorsa is the era the developers want to make a point of architectural reference, then the I suppose that is an argument for the facade.
DeBaliviere wrote:The interior of the Hadley Dean Building was restored to its original condition. I'm not crazy about the whole Egyptian motif, but at least it's original.
Even though I love art deco, I would rather see the paneling removed from the Dorsa Building.
The interior of the Hadley Dean Building first level was not really restored... it was largely obilterated! Only a small area of the glorious Egyptian motif glasswork remains, near and around the elevators. As I understand, much of the additional area was dismantled, materials thrown
in a dumpster when the adjacent space (originally the lobby?) was readied for Mosaic. If that's true, it is a travesty.
Regardless, what you see here (
http://www.decopix.com/New%20Site/Image ... _lobby.jpg) does not exist in this form today.