Spencer did a ribbon cutting for new platform gates



What political advisor would ever advise doing that??
Sent from my SM-S936U using Tapatalk
What political advisor would ever advise doing that??
Sent from my SM-S936U using Tapatalk
They could have purchased pass-through cars when they were getting new Metrolink trains, but they chose not to.SRQ2STL wrote: ↑3:35 PM - 8 days agoTBH, when they were doing this single vehicle service during Covid... I preferred it. I felt safer.
There were no car-jumpers... those people who ride the trains and hop between carriages to avoid being spotted, who are obviously up to no good... also, just the general safety in numbers aspect. When you're riding alone in a basically empty carriage... as I often found myself doing... Having more people crammed in around you makes it less likely you'll be cornered by panhandlers, solicitors or those once in a while one-offs where people approach you with weird energy/force you against your will to engage into unconsented conversation.
One thing I learned riding these trains, sitting alone in a vacant part of the cars makes you a big ol bullseye target for all sorts of unwelcome engagement. Straight up, people will mess with you for the sake of messing with you, to get a reaction. A lot of head games being played... and I'm all bruh... I just want to f*ckin get from A to B without any issue.
..yet I've never once seen them challenge a Metro decision or present passenger concerns directly to Metro as a passenger advocate. They're just like the public relations arm of Metro, acting as a one-way broadcast of whatever Metro says or does. I don't understand their point.We don’t own or operate the transit system, but we work to champion it, challenge it, encourage it and advocate for it.
I joined as a member one year, just to see what would happen. Literally.... nothing, zip, zero, zilch... the whole year. Until I got a renewal notice. It's a joke and is a non-thing. Honestly, they need to be audited.bprop wrote: ↑7:34 PM - 8 days agoWhat I can't stand about CMT is that they pretend to be advocates for both transit and passengers:
..yet I've never once seen them challenge a Metro decision or present passenger concerns directly to Metro as a passenger advocate. They're just like the public relations arm of Metro, acting as a one-way broadcast of whatever Metro says or does. I don't understand their point.We don’t own or operate the transit system, but we work to champion it, challenge it, encourage it and advocate for it.
I was shocked they wrote a letter to Bistate opposing this change and have made several social media posts opposing it. I literally thought they were only a fake PR arm so I never knew they might push back on anything.bprop wrote: ↑7:34 PM - 8 days agoWhat I can't stand about CMT is that they pretend to be advocates for both transit and passengers:
..yet I've never once seen them challenge a Metro decision or present passenger concerns directly to Metro as a passenger advocate. They're just like the public relations arm of Metro, acting as a one-way broadcast of whatever Metro says or does. I don't understand their point.We don’t own or operate the transit system, but we work to champion it, challenge it, encourage it and advocate for it.