36
New MemberNew Member
36

PostJan 26, 2025#26

Any idea if those windows on the ground floor are for retail/restaurants? Or is that just the apartment lobby? If it's the latter then that's a big disappointment to me, no matter how handsome the building may be.

522
Senior MemberSenior Member
522

PostJan 26, 2025#27

J S wrote:
Jan 26, 2025
Any idea if those windows on the ground floor are for retail/restaurants? Or is that just the apartment lobby? If it's the latter then that's a big disappointment to me, no matter how handsome the building may be.
My assumption is either lobby space or walk up apartments.

1,524
Totally AddictedTotally Addicted
1,524

PostJan 27, 2025#28

I am just happy to see content on here that doesn't involve politics or snow - The design is scaled appropriate for the site, there are better sites for skyscrapers  

2,644
Life MemberLife Member
2,644

PostJan 27, 2025#29

Read somewhere that the neighborhood doesn't want more retail in the W. Pine and Laclede spurs off Euclid

1,800
Never Logs OffNever Logs Off
1,800

PostJan 27, 2025#30

That’s too bad for the NIMBYs

941

PostJan 27, 2025#31

GoHarvOrGoHome wrote:
Jan 27, 2025
Read somewhere that the neighborhood doesn't want more retail in the W. Pine and Laclede spurs off Euclid
They are accomplishing their goal. Basically a handful of retail businesses now mixed in the CWE streets outside of euclid. There is at least the suburban abominations of Lindell Marketplace where you can get your drive thru needs and that strip mall in FPP.

788
Super MemberSuper Member
788

PostJan 28, 2025#32

GoHarvOrGoHome wrote:
Jan 27, 2025
Read somewhere that the neighborhood doesn't want more retail in the W. Pine and Laclede spurs off Euclid
In a sense I agree, I wish the retails spots north of Lindell would get busier. Maryland and Euclid seems a bit run down now.

1,628
Totally AddictedTotally Addicted
1,628

PostJan 28, 2025#33

That is all the chess club, which takes up huge space, hasn't built out and offers minimal foot traffic.  

407
Full MemberFull Member
407

PostJan 28, 2025#34

^ What's the story there?  I feel like those windows have been covered for 5 years.  Is that just how it is now, or is it taking an insane amount of time to be done with whatever renovations?  Not that it would change foot traffic necessarily, but it would at least look more pleasant.

1,628
Totally AddictedTotally Addicted
1,628

PostJan 28, 2025#35

No idea.  They pulled a big permit but I never see anyone working on it.  The building at McPherson and Euclid got rebuilt, and Dressels got a full reno in the same time frame.  

Whatever the billionaire is doing is not helpful.  Maybe he thinks he can ruin the foot traffic, kill the other businesses and buy it all. 

13K
Life MemberLife Member
13K

PostJan 28, 2025#36

My bright idea was for the Chess Club had anchored the Bridge. Instead we have a vacant lot at Euclid and Delmar and diversity-destruction at Euclid and Maryland.

272
Full MemberFull Member
272

PostJan 28, 2025#37

The construction lights are on at Maryland and Euclid, but I still see glimpses of exposed joists. Seems like very little progress has been made in the past three years. 

566
Senior MemberSenior Member
566

PostJan 28, 2025#38

TheWayoftheArch_V2.0 wrote:
Jan 28, 2025
No idea.  They pulled a big permit but I never see anyone working on it.  The building at McPherson and Euclid got rebuilt, and Dressels got a full reno in the same time frame.  

Whatever the billionaire is doing is not helpful.  Maybe he thinks he can ruin the foot traffic, kill the other businesses and buy it all. 
He would simply make an offer the owners could not turn down if he wanted to "buy it all".

1,126
Expert MemberExpert Member
1,126

PostJan 28, 2025#39

Idk, the chess club seems like some sort of tax dodge or money laundering operation for Sinquefeld. 

1,628
Totally AddictedTotally Addicted
1,628

PostJan 28, 2025#40

STLAPTS wrote:
Jan 28, 2025
TheWayoftheArch_V2.0 wrote:
Jan 28, 2025
No idea.  They pulled a big permit but I never see anyone working on it.  The building at McPherson and Euclid got rebuilt, and Dressels got a full reno in the same time frame.  

Whatever the billionaire is doing is not helpful.  Maybe he thinks he can ruin the foot traffic, kill the other businesses and buy it all. 
He would simply make an offer the owners could not turn down if he wanted to "buy it all".
That is not how billionaires become billionaires. 

2,041
Life MemberLife Member
2,041

PostFeb 06, 2025#41

Haven't heard much from Rex in these last few years.

36
New MemberNew Member
36

PostFeb 26, 2025#42

Looks like the proposal has been withdrawn, per Alderman Browning's Instagram:


Hopefully there are other interested parties who can make something work here.

13K
Life MemberLife Member
13K

PostFeb 26, 2025#43

Too bad

941

PostFeb 26, 2025#44

City can’t try to work with them here?

9,630
Life MemberLife Member
9,630

PostFeb 26, 2025#45

Seems like this project doesn’t even have basic drawings and they want a demo permit and the city is saying no. I don’t see an issue with that

272
Full MemberFull Member
272

PostFeb 26, 2025#46

If they have renderings that advanced, then yes, they have floor plans. Especially considering the level of context shown in the perspectives. 

1,126
Expert MemberExpert Member
1,126

PostFeb 26, 2025#47

I'm sorry to see this development go but I don't love Michael's recent pattern of just repeating whatever a developer blames for a project not working out. What on earth could the city have wanted them to do that cost $1 million? I want specifics. 

566
Senior MemberSenior Member
566

PostFeb 26, 2025#48

PeterXCV wrote:
Feb 26, 2025
I'm sorry to see this development go but I don't love Michael's recent pattern of just repeating whatever a developer blames for a project not working out. What on earth could the city have wanted them to do that cost $1 million? I want specifics. 
Likely a permit ready CD set of plans.  That would cost at least 1M for a project that large.  Those plans would be worthless if demo was not approved.  Developer needs some sort of certainty before committing 1M to the project.  If a developer doesn't have that level of certainty, the site will sit empty for a long time.  Not that I agree with the demo request for AHM's project on Morgan Ford, it does highlight the risk if not approved.  

9,630
Life MemberLife Member
9,630

PostFeb 26, 2025#49

STLAPTS wrote:
Feb 26, 2025
PeterXCV wrote:
Feb 26, 2025
I'm sorry to see this development go but I don't love Michael's recent pattern of just repeating whatever a developer blames for a project not working out. What on earth could the city have wanted them to do that cost $1 million? I want specifics. 
Likely a permit ready CD set of plans.  That would cost at least 1M for a project that large.  Those plans would be worthless if demo was not approved.  Developer needs some sort of certainty before committing 1M to the project.  If a developer doesn't have that level of certainty, the site will sit empty for a long time.  Not that I agree with the demo request for AHM's project on Morgan Ford, it does highlight the risk if not approved.  
Demo permit issuance can be contingent on the issuance of building permit, i don't see an issue there.  Nobody is saying submit plans and then we will decide if you get a demo permit.  I think what CRO is saying is we will approve the demo contingent on you having a building permit issued. 

1,800
Never Logs OffNever Logs Off
1,800

PostFeb 26, 2025#50

As with the WF Advisors hotels, Keeley or another developer will be back. And it won’t be very long.

Read more posts (49 remaining)