PostAug 26, 2022#51


"You can never go home again, Oatman... but I guess you can shop there. "
I know exactly how you feel Chris. I live in Tampa now and even though it is booming with development it will never have the dense, old city feel that St. Louis has. Even the inner ring suburbs of St. Louis feel urban compared to most newer cities. The roads are much narrower, the infrastructure is grander, and the layers of development give St. Louis the feel of a much bigger metropolitan area than it is. As the city and inner ring suburbs continue to get new infill, I'd imagine St. Louis will have an even more intense feel.chriss752 wrote: ↑Sep 07, 2022Just want to throw this out there since it's relevant to this thread. I've been in Kansas City for several weeks now and went home to St. Louis this past weekend for the holiday and man, three weeks rewired my head a bit.
St. Louis feels really dense now and extra crowded. In particular, me visiting the Central West End threw a curveball to me because it felt like Chicago a bit. Even the neighborhood where my family lives feels dense, and it's not even dense. It's a strange feeling since I was used to all of this and then I leave for three weeks and come back to something that feels weird. It was as much of a shock to me as seeing Washington DC or London. It'll be interesting to see how the perspective changes as time goes on, but I don't know what I like more, the dense old feel of St. Louis or the more spread out and young feel of Kansas City.
Euclid in the CWE felt foreign to me now. The mix of mansions next to commercial buildings and near apartment towers feels strange now.
I do admit that both are special in their own ways and both appeal to me but maybe this feeling is a sign. Over the past year, I've grown fond of smaller cities and towns just because things move slower there.
Despite all of these weird feelings, my favorite building anywhere remains one I would never complain about - the Continental Life Building. The surrounding neighborhood may feel strange now to me, but that building is to me like seeing the Arch. I know I'm home then. Lol.
When I was younger and went to Blues and Cards games with my folks we’d always try and pass the AB Eagle while it’s wings were flapping so the teams would have good luck.TheWayoftheArch_V2.0 wrote: ↑Sep 07, 2022I also think the Continental is a signature structure. Funny enough, when on family road trips my parents didn't announce we were home at the River/Arch. They made a huge proclamation when we passed the Anheuser-Busch eagle billboard and mid-town.
100%.
STLrainbow wrote: ↑Jul 06, 2018^ driving westbound on 40/64 is pretty cool; great views by the IKEA too with the 100 crane; if Koman gets that Cortex building right by the highway that will be really an eye-opener for folks passing through. Anyway, I think that drive separates significantly denser Saint Louis from pretenders like Nashville and Indy.
St. Louis central corridor is truly one of kind. Old world mixed with new. World class parks parks and an urban fabric that can compete with almost any city. But lets keep it in perspective. Minneapolis, for example, has a population density of almost 8,000 people per square mile with 10 neighborhoods ranging from 15k-20k per square mile. The CWE by comparison is 8.8k. The "skyline" might not stretch as long but the population density isn't even close.symphonicpoet wrote: ↑Sep 10, 2022^The first time I really realized it was from the top of the arch when I was . . . twenty? I was looking out and realized that there were these significant skyline bumps at Midtown, CWE, and even then already Clayton. You can, of course, find cities that beat it to pieces, but really not so many. Chicago, sure. New York, of course. Philadelphia. Seattle is really beginning to these days. But even quite sizable cities like Denver and Minneapolis don't really give me that impression of length.
Oh, I'm not arguing St. Louis is more dense. Just that there's a impressiveness to the chain of pearls effect of the progression. In fact, my very point is that some larger cities don't really have that, which is specifically why I chose Minneapolis and Denver. It's honestly quite hard to capture in a picture, though. It's subtle.STLAPTS wrote: ↑Sep 12, 2022St. Louis central corridor is truly one of kind. Old world mixed with new. World class parks parks and an urban fabric that can compete with almost any city. But lets keep it in perspective. Minneapolis, for example, has a population density of almost 8,000 people per square mile with 10 neighborhoods ranging from 15k-20k per square mile. The CWE by comparison is 8.8k. The "skyline" might not stretch as long but the population density isn't even close.symphonicpoet wrote: ↑Sep 10, 2022^The first time I really realized it was from the top of the arch when I was . . . twenty? I was looking out and realized that there were these significant skyline bumps at Midtown, CWE, and even then already Clayton. You can, of course, find cities that beat it to pieces, but really not so many. Chicago, sure. New York, of course. Philadelphia. Seattle is really beginning to these days. But even quite sizable cities like Denver and Minneapolis don't really give me that impression of length.
What is that brutalist mountain in the lower right side? It's a real "breauty"!STLAPTS wrote: ↑Sep 12, 2022https://assets.nationbuilder.com/fairvo ... 1510956709
Minneapolis skyline. Doesn’t capture entire length but does a pretty good job.
University of MinnesotaTheWayoftheArch_V2.0 wrote: ↑Sep 12, 2022What is that brutalist mountain in the lower right side? It's a real "breauty"!STLAPTS wrote: ↑Sep 12, 2022https://assets.nationbuilder.com/fairvo ... 1510956709
Minneapolis skyline. Doesn’t capture entire length but does a pretty good job.