^You know, I'm understanding to the plights of the homeless, having lived in Downtown for a number of years right near Larry Rice's old place, passing people on the streets on a daily basis while I worked Downtown, and being rather empathetic towards their circumstances. That stated, it is not the purpose of parks for the homeless to hang out.
If not for loitering, what does one even do in a park?
The purpose of parks are to visit, but not to loiter. I don't want to get into semantics about the differentiation between the Webster definitions of visiting versus loitering. But, I will say that they weren't made for the specific purpose of giving the homeless prime real estate to just hang out.
Where it comes to 909 Chestnut (the topic of this thread, after all), I'm in favor of doing whatever it takes for this building to be sold and redeveloped to some party that will make productive use of it. I'm not really thinking putting up port-a-johns for the homeless will really make it that much more marketable, but I'm not a real estate agent (all that assuming the port-a-johns are even used for their purposes).
The point is clear, though, that this building is less likely to be bought and redeveloped if there's always homeless people crapping on it.
This needs to be fixed.