12K
Life MemberLife Member
12K

PostAug 14, 2020#201

We're screwed. 

STL has no leaders

Even my most "progressive" friends are opposed to Ward reduction. They're opposed to ANY sort of City/County consolidation. They're opposed to (even the idea of) airport privatization. They claim to be "progressive", but really they're just another generation of the same old - same old. 

Meanwhile, folks heading out of town keep telling us what we're doing wrong, but we don't listen. We just keep on doing the same sh*t, expecting a different result. 

I'm frustrated. I just don't get it. 

5,705
Life MemberLife Member
5,705

PostAug 14, 2020#202

sc4mayor wrote:
Aug 14, 2020
wabash wrote:
Aug 14, 2020
So airport privatization shows we're a successful metro and non-privatization is dysfunction and incompetence? 

Is the "gig" Cincinnati won different from the one Nashville won? 
Based on what I can tell it's a distribution center at their airport that will employ around 2,000 people.  So basically one of their massive fulfillment centers, but with planes.
https://www.constructiondive.com/news/a ... ub/554912/

Airport privatization (especially the back room plan being pushed on STL) isn't going to solve the dysfunction around here.  I don't know who pitched Amazon on this cargo center in Cincy, but it broke ground more than a year ago.  AllianceSTL seems to be a step in the right direction and I could take up a lot of space writing about some of the things we do get right here.  Agtech, Geospatial, Cortex, 39North, Square and the future NOW district in addition to the general startup scene, etc.  I'd hardly say we "never get anything right."

Bob Clark is a smart guy and these things do need to be said, but sometimes I wonder if he puts as much of an effort into fixing these problems behind the scenes as he does complaining about them in the local press.  A lot of our executives are really good at taking pot shots in the paper or on KMOX, but I wonder how many of the overly critical ones are truly engaged in the background.
Agree with a lot of points made.   

The one thing I would highlight is that Agtech, Cortex, 39 North, and NOW etc. all have independent leadership leading their developments that are tied to private entities in one way or another.   The city/county involvement was to lay the ground work for tax incentives and rules but not really the leg work to land developments, businesses and tenants.   

I think that is the one thing that airport privatization offers is leadership that will probably spend just as much time and put more resources to develop the airport property just as much as getting planes off the ground.   Economic Development is not the mandate for better or worse for current leadership and or obviously of city leadership.    Maybe what should be done is go the route of an airport district, call it AIRLAND District or whatever works.  Essentially a CORTEX like arrangement where the mandate is logistics.   

3,968
Life MemberLife Member
3,968

PostAug 14, 2020#203

wabash wrote:
Aug 14, 2020
So airport privatization shows we're a successful metro and non-privatization is dysfunction and incompetence? 

Is the "gig" Cincinnati won different from the one Nashville won? 
Framer replied but basically Nashville is office jobs. Cincy is their cargo hub.

And if they mayor didn’t know about it whoever didn’t clue the mayor in needs replaced on jobs in the future. Something like that at minimum should have the mayor and county exec involved. Probably more of the area leaders.

sc4mayor
sc4mayor

PostAug 14, 2020#204

framer wrote:
Aug 14, 2020
We're screwed. 

STL has no leaders

Even my most "progressive" friends are opposed to Ward reduction. They're opposed to ANY sort of City/County consolidation. They're opposed to (even the idea of) airport privatization. They claim to be "progressive", but really they're just another generation of the same old - same old. 

Meanwhile, folks heading out of town keep telling us what we're doing wrong, but we don't listen. We just keep on doing the same sh*t, expecting a different result. 

I'm frustrated. I just don't get it. 
I'd ask your "progressive" friends what the last 60+ years of the status quo has gotten done for Black lives in this region.  What has the status quo accomplished in fixing the region's crushing income and racial inequalities (among other issues)?  True progressives care about these things and want to make the changes to address them.  If your friends aren't into fixing those issues...call them what they are to their face.  Small-minded, parochial conservatives.  Tell them to stop b*tching about problems on Twitter like most progressives and be a part of an actual solution.

For what it's worth my office is in Chesterfield and many of the people I communicate with out there (typically the small-minded, parochial types) actually want to make changes (usually saying something along the lines of "I'm not crazy about it, but we have got to do something").  I don't agree with a lot of what they have to say in general, but only an idiot couldn't see the writing on the wall in this region.  Even my ultra-Conservative father is ready for some sort of consolidation.  Now, he's a partner at one of the larger privately held firms in St. Louis so he knows that if we keep going down this road it'll eventually get bad for his business too.  I've also been beating this stuff into his head for years lol.

Either way, you're a part of the solution or a part of the problem...it sounds like your progressive friends are part of the problem.  I'd be blunt and tell them right to their face.  Tell them maintaining the status quo in St. Louis is basically a vote for the racist, exclusionary policies this region has been pushing for the last century.  If that doesn't set them straight, then they've shown their true colors.

3,762
Life MemberLife Member
3,762

PostAug 14, 2020#205

^ i think the mindset of one progressive constituent in the city is that ward reduction and merger/consolidation—as they have been proposed—will somehow be detrimental to black representation and will just continue or worsen the status quo regarding racial inequality. i think that's nonsense, of course, but i don't think it's fair to say they're not "true progressives" because they oppose the changes that have been put forward. the problem is that they're operating based on hypotheticals (with regard to merger/consolidation and ward reduction, at least) and not proposing anything better. (disclosure: i completely oppose anything airport-related that is put together by the current Sinquefield-led group. they have shown that they cannot be trusted, and i don't trust them to do anything in good faith going forward.)

sc4mayor
sc4mayor

PostAug 14, 2020#206

^ Well said, and I pretty much agree.

For what it's worth, I wasn't trying to sh*t on progressives in general (I, mostly, consider myself one), but sitting around rejecting every plan (rightfully on the airport, not so much on consolidation or ward reduction) with no other suggestion, as you point out, really burns my ass.

2,430
Life MemberLife Member
2,430

PostAug 14, 2020#207

I suspect a sound majority of "progressives" support city re-entry into the county and probably at a much higher rate than county residents would support re-entry.

As for the Amazon Prime air cargo hub selecting the Cincy airport/Northern Kentucky, imo it is more of an example of it going to a "fragmented" region than of a "unified" region. Also, the airport is owned by Kenton County and it is not privatized, so again I just don't see the argument here.  

12K
Life MemberLife Member
12K

PostAug 14, 2020#208

Progressives hate All Things Sinquifield.  Unfortunately, his name is now permanently linked to some of the bigger initiatives around here. Progressives will automatically reject anything he has supported, without ever giving it a fair hearing (heck, one of my friends even attacks any artist who dares show their work at the Chess Museum). 

3,762
Life MemberLife Member
3,762

PostAug 14, 2020#209

^ yeah, amazing what repeated attempts to undermine the democratic process will do to a billionaire's reputation.

sc4mayor
sc4mayor

PostAug 14, 2020#210

^^ Which is a shame because Sinquifield, as far as I know, wasn’t behind Proposition R (the original ward reduction prop in 2012, and so what if he was...it’s still sound policy) and he’s also not behind the Board of Freeholders which is where the primary re-entry idea has come from.  The Municipal League is behind that and considering their previous stances on merger talk, the fact that Pat Kelly and his organization collected the signatures to start the process is somewhat noteworthy in my opinion.

Better Together is dead.  It’s not coming back...but I think people saw what that would have entailed and have since opened their mind toward something like re-entry and smaller more incremental improvements.  Like the Municipal League for example.

It sounds like these progressives you speak of have lost sight of the forest for the trees.  They need to compartmentalize their hatred for Rex.  His plan for airport privatization is bad and so far, probably dead.  His BT plan is dead and gone.  I don’t know what they’re so scared of, his two biggest initiatives have basically gone down in flames lol.

^ He deserves his sh*tty reputation...but when people are letting his reputation cloud their judgment about good sound policy proposals that he's not involved in (like re-entry and reduction), we have a problem.

2,430
Life MemberLife Member
2,430

PostAug 14, 2020#211

^ again, this idea that "progressives" don't support things like ward reduction, Board of Freeholders/re-entry, etc. is made up.... some do, some don't. There is no problem with "progressives" anymore than there is with other groups. Haterz just gonna hate, I guess.  

sc4mayor
sc4mayor

PostAug 14, 2020#212

STLrainbow wrote:
Aug 14, 2020
^ again, this idea that "progressives" don't support things like ward reduction, Board of Freeholders/re-entry, etc. is made up.... some do, some don't. There is no problem with "progressives" anymore than there is with other groups. Haterz just gonna hate, I guess.  
Framer mentioned his progressive friends, that's who I'm referring too.  I know plenty of progressives, myself included, that support these things (see my reply to u_d further up thread).  We're just able to separate Rex from it, which is what I'm taking issue with.  I'd hardly call any of this "hatred."

3,762
Life MemberLife Member
3,762

PostAug 15, 2020#213

sc4mayor wrote:
Aug 14, 2020
^ He deserves his sh*tty reputation...but when people are letting his reputation cloud their judgment about good sound policy proposals that he's not involved in (like re-entry and reduction), we have a problem.
is that even happening? i don't think the opposition to unification and ward reduction has anything to do with Stinquefield. but people rightly distrust him because of his repeated attempts to kill the earnings tax despite overwhelming public support for it, because of his shady involvement in the airport business, and generally because he throws dark money all over the place to promote his personal agenda. like i said in another thread, he's currently funding an effort to recall alderwoman Spencer because she's been successful at tanking his dirty airport efforts. he's paying people--some of whom aren't even city residents--to collect signatures. he's a f*cking billionaire baby.

PostAug 15, 2020#214

STLrainbow wrote:
Aug 14, 2020
^ again, this idea that "progressives" don't support things like ward reduction, Board of Freeholders/re-entry, etc. is made up.... some do, some don't. There is no problem with "progressives" anymore than there is with other groups. Haterz just gonna hate, I guess.  
that's why i specifically said "one progressive constituent."

sc4mayor
sc4mayor

PostAug 15, 2020#215

urban_dilettante wrote:
Aug 15, 2020
sc4mayor wrote:
Aug 14, 2020
^ He deserves his sh*tty reputation...but when people are letting his reputation cloud their judgment about good sound policy proposals that he's not involved in (like re-entry and reduction), we have a problem.
is that even happening? i don't think the opposition to unification and ward reduction has anything to do with Stinquefield. but people rightly distrust him because of his repeated attempts to kill the earnings tax despite overwhelming public support for it, because of his shady involvement in the airport business, and generally because he throws dark money all over the place to promote his personal agenda. like i said in another thread, he's currently funding an effort to recall alderwoman Spencer because she's been successful at tanking his dirty airport efforts. he's paying people--some of whom aren't even city residents--to collect signatures. he's a f*cking billionaire baby.
I was replying to comments like this:
framer wrote:Even my most "progressive" friends are opposed to Ward reduction. They're opposed to ANY sort of City/County consolidation. They're opposed to (even the idea of) airport privatization. They claim to be "progressive", but really they're just another generation of the same old - same old.
framer wrote:Progressives hate All Things Sinquifield.  Unfortunately, his name is now permanently linked to some of the bigger initiatives around here. Progressives will automatically reject anything he has supported, without ever giving it a fair hearing (heck, one of my friends even attacks any artist who dares show their work at the Chess Museum).
Is people conflating ward reduction and re-entry with Rex widespread?  I don't believe so, but again, I was replying to the quotes here...not making a general statement about different types of voters.  As for Rex, yeah he's a piece of sh*t, I wasn't arguing that.

6,123
Life MemberLife Member
6,123

PostAug 15, 2020#216

^I feel like we're getting a bit off topic here. (Not that I'm one to talk.) Has there been any further discussion of the Grow MO led privatization initiative since the attorney suggested it wasn't valid? Where do things stand with Reed's push?

13K
Life MemberLife Member
13K

PostAug 16, 2020#217

StlToday- Messenger: Key goal in airport privatization effort? Getting consultants paid millions in extra fees.

https://www.stltoday.com/news/local/col ... 0.amp.html

6,123
Life MemberLife Member
6,123

PostAug 17, 2020#218

Of course the NRA is involved in this story. Mind you, I'm not here to run down firearms sports, as I have rather enjoyed them on occasion. (Not serious about it, but target shooting and skeet shooting are both kind of fun. And I have enjoyed fishing and support hunting on principal. After all, venison is darn tasty and a healthy ecosystem requires predators. And hunters by and in large make great environmental conservationists.) But the NRA doesn't seem to be so much about firearms sports as Republican fundraising these days.

1,213
Expert MemberExpert Member
1,213

PostAug 18, 2020#219

^or foreign election interference, they seem to be big on that as well.

sc4mayor
sc4mayor

PostAug 18, 2020#220

A pretty pro-privatization piece from The Atlantic. A passing mention of St. Louis too.
https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archi ... ts/615331/

12K
Life MemberLife Member
12K

PostAug 18, 2020#221

^Good read. Thanks for the link.

2,929
Life MemberLife Member
2,929

PostAug 18, 2020#222

framer wrote:
Aug 14, 2020
Did anyone happen to see Bob Clark on Donnybrook tonight? He mentioned that Amazon told him that St. Louis's effort land an Amazon distribution center was the worst they had received from any city. Cincinnati won the gig, and they are getting tens of thousands of new jobs out of it. He said he didn't even think that the mayor of STL knew we were trying for it. Meanwhile, thousands of acres of empty land still sit undeveloped around the airport. 

He also expects a great many airports around the country will be at least partially privately run in twenty years. We could have been one of the first to cash in on the trend; instead we continue to wallow in dysfunction. 

Why can't we ever seem to get something right? Are we really that incompetent around here? 
I'll be checking out to see if KETC has that episode available for replay... 

The Amazon Prime Hub was one of the best opportunities STL Lambert Airport has had in many, many years. Around the time word first emerged in the Air Cargo world that this could actually happen, my work had me engaged with the airport's leadership on related matters. After one meeting I had with them, I knew they were competing for it; same time, they sure weren't confirming it, and certainly not with any specificity. I didn't know who or what organizations were involved other than certain Airport personnel... It was less than a year after I first asked STL about this that Amazon announced they were going with Cincinnati/Northern Kentucky. Again, I don't know exactly who was involved in the pitch, but I know for absolute certain that the Missouri Chamber of Commerce had no damn idea that anyone around here even pitched STL to Amazon. Turns out I was the one to inadvertently break it to the Missouri Chamber that a failed STL proposal had been submitted for it. They were definitely not pleased to know they were kept in the dark. Maybe a better way to say it was they were absolutely furious. 

So, yeah, hearing that City Hall had no idea about this isn't surprising. 
My hope is that AllianceSTL will never let such a monumental screw-up like this happen again. 

The airport needs to change by any means necessary. If privatization, then so be it. At minimum, we could use a PPP for development of better air cargo infrastructure. 

2,327
Life MemberLife Member
2,327

PostAug 18, 2020#223

Thousands of acres that can’t be redeveloped until the bonds to build W1W are paid off. The idea was a private operator would pay off the debt and build like mad.

13K
Life MemberLife Member
13K

PostAug 18, 2020#224

Anyone know why that is? So they don't sell the land to pay the debt?

PostAug 18, 2020#225

gone corporate wrote:
Aug 18, 2020
framer wrote:
Aug 14, 2020
Did anyone happen to see Bob Clark on Donnybrook tonight? He mentioned that Amazon told him that St. Louis's effort land an Amazon distribution center was the worst they had received from any city. Cincinnati won the gig, and they are getting tens of thousands of new jobs out of it. He said he didn't even think that the mayor of STL knew we were trying for it. Meanwhile, thousands of acres of empty land still sit undeveloped around the airport. 

He also expects a great many airports around the country will be at least partially privately run in twenty years. We could have been one of the first to cash in on the trend; instead we continue to wallow in dysfunction. 

Why can't we ever seem to get something right? Are we really that incompetent around here? 
I'll be checking out to see if KETC has that episode available for replay...  
Here it is
https://www.ninenet.org/donnybrook/

Read more posts (32 remaining)