Bankrupting medicare and social security isn’t going to pass the Houseleeharveyawesome wrote: ↑Mar 11, 2020Trump to address nation this evening.
Rumor is that the payroll tax will be suspended for the remainder of 2020.
- 9,674
- 2,663
It’s going to be a rough spring for downtown businesses...dbInSouthCity wrote:NCAA will play March Madness with no fans in the arenas. Including 2 rounds that will be played at Enterprise next week
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
- 1,649
They wil find the money. They always do. Don't scare boomers. If the House doesn't pass it then that means they don't care about people dying from coronavirus. It's called politics.
As far as no fan March Madness. ***** THAT
I would rather see them move it to a smaller gym if there won't be many fans. SLU/SIUE/UMSL, etc. I doubt they do, but there isn't a point to have a huge area (except for maybe locker room space).dbInSouthCity wrote: ↑Mar 11, 2020NCAA will play March Madness with no fans in the arenas. Including 2 rounds that will be played at Enterprise next week
Not just here...but everywhere. Chicago has already lost 4 conventions at McCormick Place totaling over 100,000 visitors to that city. My industry's trade show is at McCormick this year...it alone brings around 45,000 folks to Chicago...who knows what's going to happen with that.GoHarvOrGoHome wrote: ↑Mar 11, 2020It’s going to be a rough spring for downtown businesses...dbInSouthCity wrote:NCAA will play March Madness with no fans in the arenas. Including 2 rounds that will be played at Enterprise next week
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
It's estimated that the average convention attendee in Chicago spends close to $300 per day while they're in the city. As someone who's been to plenty of conferences in Chicago...that's probably not too far off.
https://www.chicagotribune.com/business ... story.html
- 9,674
Saturday downtown st.patricks day parade has been cancelled.
Just move it to St. Gabe'sjshank83 wrote: ↑Mar 11, 2020I would rather see them move it to a smaller gym if there won't be many fans. SLU/SIUE/UMSL, etc. I doubt they do, but there isn't a point to have a huge area (except for maybe locker room space).dbInSouthCity wrote: ↑Mar 11, 2020NCAA will play March Madness with no fans in the arenas. Including 2 rounds that will be played at Enterprise next week
- 3,235
I don’t go to the parade. But if you are afraid you are going to get sick you don’t have to go. Again, nothing at all has changed since this morning.ricke002 wrote:But if it doesn't directly affect ME, why should I care?!?JaneJacobsGhost wrote: ↑Mar 11, 2020THIS is the most irresponsible take out there right now. "It's no big deal yet. Just wash your hands you big jabroni!"downtown2007 wrote: ↑Mar 11, 2020The person from Bayer has not tested positive. There is still only 1 positive test in STL thus far. At this point, the whole situation is overblown. Use common sense, wash your hands, and carry on.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Why do people need body bags to realize this needs to be addressed with serious measures right now? Lets be conservative and suppose that 0.5% of the population of StL requires hospitalization. That's 1500 people or 250 more people than beds at Barnes's CWE hospital, most of which already have sick people in them.
Stop being flippant.
The more likely % of people that will require hospitalization is between 2.5 and 5. Imagine 15K St. Louisans requiring hospitalization on the next 2-3 months? Seeing the seriousness yet?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
- 9,674
Totally dude, I didn’t go to China where this started so I’m good, right? Why do you think the f’in guy who’s the director of National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases since 1984 is asking to all mass gatherings of 250 or more to be banned for near futuredowntown2007 wrote: ↑Mar 11, 2020I don’t go to the parade. But if you are afraid you are going to get sick you don’t have to go. Again, nothing at all has changed since this morning.ricke002 wrote:But if it doesn't directly affect ME, why should I care?!?JaneJacobsGhost wrote: ↑Mar 11, 2020THIS is the most irresponsible take out there right now. "It's no big deal yet. Just wash your hands you big jabroni!"
Why do people need body bags to realize this needs to be addressed with serious measures right now? Lets be conservative and suppose that 0.5% of the population of StL requires hospitalization. That's 1500 people or 250 more people than beds at Barnes's CWE hospital, most of which already have sick people in them.
Stop being flippant.
The more likely % of people that will require hospitalization is between 2.5 and 5. Imagine 15K St. Louisans requiring hospitalization on the next 2-3 months? Seeing the seriousness yet?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Let’s think this through- you don’t go to a parade. Your co worker does. He/she gets the virus and comes to work without having any symptoms. And now you have it. Your boss has it. Your bosses 76 year old mom is has it and is dead in 10 days. But you didn’t go to the parade. Google community spread and listen to people who know what they’re talking about- CDC doctors
- 1,815
Very few, if any, of use are worried about this. We are worried about our parents, grand parents, infants and our immuno-compromised friends, family, and neighbors.downtown2007 wrote: ↑Mar 11, 2020I don’t go to the parade. But if you are afraid you are going to get sick you don’t have to go. Again, nothing at all has changed since this morning.ricke002 wrote:But if it doesn't directly affect ME, why should I care?!?JaneJacobsGhost wrote: ↑Mar 11, 2020THIS is the most irresponsible take out there right now. "It's no big deal yet. Just wash your hands you big jabroni!"
Why do people need body bags to realize this needs to be addressed with serious measures right now? Lets be conservative and suppose that 0.5% of the population of StL requires hospitalization. That's 1500 people or 250 more people than beds at Barnes's CWE hospital, most of which already have sick people in them.
Stop being flippant.
The more likely % of people that will require hospitalization is between 2.5 and 5. Imagine 15K St. Louisans requiring hospitalization on the next 2-3 months? Seeing the seriousness yet?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Despite my previous comments on this thread, I do worry about the people mentioned. Personally, I'm not that worried about my own health despite having a terrible and borderline non-existent immune system. Sadly, I'm staying away from some of my friends just because they've had a cold recently and other things. I don't want to bring that into my house. However, I'm not going to imprison myself in my house to stay away from the coronavirus. My family knows this so we are all being careful.JaneJacobsGhost wrote: ↑Mar 11, 2020Very few, if any, of use are worried about this. We are worried about our parents, grand parents, infants and our immuno-compromised friends, family, and neighbors.
Still, I believe what I said before. This still seems pretty overblown. Could I be wrong? Maybe. But reading an earlier post about a Senate Meeting where the 150 Million infected people figure was thrown around makes me shake my head. I highly doubt we will get that many if China never did and still hasn't. Living conditions in the U.S. are much better than in China. While our hospital system probably can't handle all the patients the U.S. will get, we will get something done (states will probably handle it) to combat this disease. I could see some schools become temporary hospitals if we need the space. Colleges are canceling classes anyway, so it could make some sense to use empty dorm buildings as care centers for a few months.
There are multiple avenues to take in this. Changing how we do our lives on a day to day basis isn't needed right now. For some, yes. But for an overwhelming majority of Americans, we don't have to change how we live our lives.
We are smart people. We should act that way instead of canceling everything out of fear. I'm interested in seeing just how many cases we have. It's going to be a week or two but I doubt we are over 500,000 nationwide cases right now. I also know, as well as all of you, that scientists are working on a vaccine. That's great but we need to try and speed up the process. The Israelis are working on an oral vaccine and seem to be the furthest ahead in research. Countries should team with them to advance this much faster.
Common sense and thought will prevail over impulsive decisions and fear.
I must also apologize for my incoherent and rambling posts. Not like any of you care but I thought I would put that out there.
- 2,663
As an authoritarian government China had the ability to take drastic actions to prevent the spread of the virus. I doubt the US or any western country would have the ability to do near what China did
- 9,674
chriss752 wrote: ↑Mar 11, 2020Despite my previous comments on this thread, I do worry about the people mentioned. Personally, I'm not that worried about my own health despite having a terrible and borderline non-existent immune system. Sadly, I'm staying away from some of my friends just because they've had a cold recently and other things. I don't want to bring that into my house. However, I'm not going to imprison myself in my house to stay away from the coronavirus. My family knows this so we are all being careful.JaneJacobsGhost wrote: ↑Mar 11, 2020Very few, if any, of use are worried about this. We are worried about our parents, grand parents, infants and our immuno-compromised friends, family, and neighbors.
Still, I believe what I said before. This still seems pretty overblown. Could I be wrong? Maybe. But reading an earlier post about a Senate Meeting where the 150 Million infected people figure was thrown around makes me shake my head. I highly doubt we will get that many if China never did and still hasn't. Living conditions in the U.S. are much better than in China. While our hospital system probably can't handle all the patients the U.S. will get, we will get something done (states will probably handle it) to combat this disease. I could see some schools become temporary hospitals if we need the space. Colleges are canceling classes anyway, so it could make some sense to use empty dorm buildings as care centers for a few months.
There are multiple avenues to take in this. Changing how we do our lives on a day to day basis isn't needed right now. For some, yes. But for an overwhelming majority of Americans, we don't have to change how we live our lives.
We are smart people. We should act that way instead of canceling everything out of fear. I'm interested in seeing just how many cases we have. It's going to be a week or two but I doubt we are over 500,000 nationwide cases right now. I also know, as well as all of you, that scientists are working on a vaccine. That's great but we need to try and speed up the process. The Israelis are working on an oral vaccine and seem to be the furthest ahead in research. Countries should team with them to advance this much faster.
Common sense and thought will prevail over impulsive decisions and fear.
I must also apologize for my incoherent and rambling posts. Not like any of you care but I thought I would put that out there.
I was sure you would take the last day or so and google what a “novel coronavirus” is but doesn’t appear so. And common sense & though has prevailed- hence why mass gatherings are postponed. That will minimize the impact.
Again- the head of the agency that handles virus’ for 36 years now, said just today. We aren’t ready, things will get worse. Ban mass gatherings.
- 2,430
Please, folks, take this stuff seriously. The way we avoid having to take extreme measures like Italy has had to take is by not doing what Italy was doing a week ago and that was not taking things particularly seriously. We were gifted with a bit of time and let's not squander that. Things will get more serious but if we take strong action now we can minimize the pain.
- 9,674
Year from now this will be an interesting study/discussion- how Asian technocratic democracies (incl. Taiwin, not featured) are dealing with it better than western liberal democracies
- 9,674
I think the mayor has to considered issues a EO to close event/venues of 250 or more just to save them, if she does that they can file insurance claims for the revenue loss which is going to happen either way
Well hope none of you had plans to go to Europe. It’s banned for the next 30 days
NBA player Rudy Gobert of the Utah Jazz, has tested positive. Their game tonight was called off right before tip off as the result came in. What happens with the rest of the team now? No clue
Update- nba has suspended its season
Update- nba has suspended its season
Britain is the exception here. This is something I think needs to be done. We should really have the British enforce rules to prevent non-British people from coming to the US. It may be controversial but it’s an ideadbInSouthCity wrote:Well hope none of you had plans to go to Europe. It’s banned for the next 30 days
- 1,649
I'm supposed to be in Europe in 56 days. We'll see about that.
Tom Hanks has coronovirus.
If Europe banned travel from China immediately like Trump did we'd probably be ok. Didn't happen.
Tom Hanks has coronovirus.
If Europe banned travel from China immediately like Trump did we'd probably be ok. Didn't happen.
- 1,614
Imagine if he'd taken it seriously weeks agoleeharveyawesome wrote: ↑Mar 12, 2020I'm supposed to be in Europe in 56 days. We'll see about that.
Tom Hanks has coronovirus.
If Europe banned travel from China immediately like Trump did we'd probably be ok. Didn't happen.







