5,705
Life MemberLife Member
5,705

PostJun 05, 2022#1026

Thanks for posting everyone.   Believe PD posted story noting that additional state funds brings total up to $60 million from $54 million.

Looking at the map that Sc4mayor posted just reaffirms my thought that the city would have a big win if they would commit a good chunk of the Ram's settlement funds and pursue the removal of raised section of freeway between Wash Ave and Cass Ave with a blvd, incorporate 

Put in orange lines on Sc4mayor map for improvements dollars for extending Tucker & 7th street cycle tracks north to Cass, extend Cass Ave improvements east to a new at grade intersection w new blvd, replace raised freeway south w new blvd to new at grade intersection w Wash Ave/Eads bridge.  Would be another $75 to $100 million improvement is my guess but also fits current POTUS admin plans for Fed transportation grants/infrastructure.   Committing part of the Ram's settlement funds now would go a long long way securing Feds matching funds for near northside/north riverfront improvements and accessability.  

1,291
Veteran MemberVeteran Member
1,291

PostJun 22, 2022#1027

Trololzilla wrote:
May 14, 2022
River Des Peres potholes finally got to my car last night and ate one of my tires. Hopefully my reporting via the website helps.
It did not, it seems. The report was closed but the hole that ate my tire was not.

9,561
Life MemberLife Member
9,561

PostJul 12, 2022#1028


1,106
Expert MemberExpert Member
1,106

PostJul 12, 2022#1029

Wish they wouldn't invest, would rather have the interstates torn down. 

212
Junior MemberJunior Member
212

PostJul 20, 2022#1030

Wow - I had to drive into STL from Chicago for meetings this week. Waze took me to the meetings using I-70. Wowsers! The Highway looks rugged, and like fine art is starting to look like Post Apocalyptic America or Escape from New York. Even the Stan Span looks terrible now. The rebuild can't be more than 15 years; however, the Highway is showing its' age, especially on the overpasses where the fake bricks were installed. Hopefully, this is being addressed soon by the state?

sc4mayor
sc4mayor

PostJul 20, 2022#1031

^ Bridge painting/rehabilitation is on deck for the Stan Span as it is for lots of other bridges on I-70.  Also replacing all the signage from Warren County to the Mississippi.

The list is two comments up in DBs tweets…

1,878
Never Logs OffNever Logs Off
1,878

PostJul 22, 2022#1032

Interesting note involving St. Louis here from theautopian.com:
Rivian Starts EV Van Deliveries

Photo credit: David Tracy

Hey, remember the electric delivery van Rivian was developing for Amazon? Well despite production delays for Rivian’s R1T pickup truck and R1S SUV, the van has finally made it out on the streets. Automotive News reports that Amazon can now put Rivian-built delivery vans into service across America, so there’s a chance your next overnight shipment of googly eyes might arrive in an EV.
“In 2019, Rivian and Amazon committed to fast-tracking a new type of delivery vehicle that would result in a significant reduction of carbon emissions,” Rivian CEO RJ Scaringe said in a joint statement by the companies. “That vision is now being realized.”
Expect to see these electric delivery vans hitting the streets in Baltimore, Chicago, Dallas, Kansas City, Nashville, Phoenix, San Diego, Seattle, and St. Louis, with more cities to be added later.
Good to see STL as one of the pilot cities to roll these delivery vans out.  Honestly the vans themselves are pretty fascinating - they're modular. See those lines that run up the side of the van? Those are sections that can be added or removed (at the time of assembly, anyway) to make the van longer or shorter depending on the volume needed.

I know, Amazon is an all-consuming monopolistic colossus of a company, and these vans are still cars. But for last-mile deliveries where vehicles are the only viable option today, these are much preferable to gas or diesel trucks. I'm interested to see them out and about.

-RBB

525
Senior MemberSenior Member
525

PostJul 22, 2022#1033

rbb wrote:
Jul 22, 2022
Interesting note involving St. Louis here from theautopian.com:
Rivian Starts EV Van Deliveries

Photo credit: David Tracy

Hey, remember the electric delivery van Rivian was developing for Amazon? Well despite production delays for Rivian’s R1T pickup truck and R1S SUV, the van has finally made it out on the streets. Automotive News reports that Amazon can now put Rivian-built delivery vans into service across America, so there’s a chance your next overnight shipment of googly eyes might arrive in an EV.
“In 2019, Rivian and Amazon committed to fast-tracking a new type of delivery vehicle that would result in a significant reduction of carbon emissions,” Rivian CEO RJ Scaringe said in a joint statement by the companies. “That vision is now being realized.”
Expect to see these electric delivery vans hitting the streets in Baltimore, Chicago, Dallas, Kansas City, Nashville, Phoenix, San Diego, Seattle, and St. Louis, with more cities to be added later.
Good to see STL as one of the pilot cities to roll these delivery vans out.  Honestly the vans themselves are pretty fascinating - they're modular. See those lines that run up the side of the van? Those are sections that can be added or removed (at the time of assembly, anyway) to make the van longer or shorter depending on the volume needed.

I know, Amazon is an all-consuming monopolistic colossus of a company, and these vans are still cars. But for last-mile deliveries where vehicles are the only viable option today, these are much preferable to gas or diesel trucks. I'm interested to see them out and about.

-RBB
I'll add that in addition to being electric, I'm happy to see that they're vans rather than trucks. Both of these factors are friendlier for the pedestrians and others using the streets alongside these vehicles.

5,705
Life MemberLife Member
5,705

PostJul 22, 2022#1034

Thanks for posting.   I assume they are coming out of Normal IL.  

too bad POTUS couldn't get Congress & USPS to buy into more EVs on their fleet replacement plan.   Last mile delivery seems as ideal as you can get for EV fleets and a big win in a lot different ways

188
Junior MemberJunior Member
188

PostJul 30, 2022#1035


2,687
Life MemberLife Member
2,687

PostJul 30, 2022#1036

In other federal programming news, Biden Administration Announces New PROTECT Formula Program, $7.3 Billion from Bipartisan Infrastructure Law to Help Communities Build Resilient Infrastructure. Missouri will get $180M over 5 years

Does STL have any qualified projects? Maybe a section of critical transit infrastructure underwater? Any ideas?

https://highways.dot.gov/newsroom/biden ... bipartisan


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

5,705
Life MemberLife Member
5,705

PostAug 13, 2022#1037

It seems that the region's was on a roll with Federal grants until the latest RAISE announcement of $2.2. billion in grants for which they were split 50/50 between urban and rural.   KC picked up a grant to study a transport corridor along with city of Excelsior Springs picking up a rural grant to make intersection, pedestrian and trail improvements.   

An indirect benefit is a RAISE Grant went to a Springfield grade separation project.   The more grade separation the better it will be for Amtrak Lincoln & Texas Eagle service between St. Louis and Chicago.  

https://fox4kc.com/news/grant-to-study- ... ependence/

https://1027kearneymo.com/kpgz-news/202 ... aise-grant

https://rodneydavis.house.gov/posts/dav ... il-project

sc4mayor
sc4mayor

PostSep 15, 2022#1038

It looks like the city put out a bid request for a "Principal Arterials Traffic Safety Enhancement" plan at the end of August.  Bids are due on 9/23/22.
https://www.stlouis-mo.gov/government/d ... 7&source=2

1,291
Veteran MemberVeteran Member
1,291

PostNov 22, 2022#1039

Railroad strike possible in approximately two weeks unless negotiations progress with the holdouts:

https://www.cnn.com/2022/11/21/business ... index.html

1,868
Never Logs OffNever Logs Off
1,868

PostNov 22, 2022#1040

Trololzilla wrote:
Nov 22, 2022
Railroad strike possible in approximately two weeks unless negotiations progress with the holdouts:

https://www.cnn.com/2022/11/21/business ... index.html
Congress forcing workers to accept the employers' terms seems more likely than a strike.

12K
Life MemberLife Member
12K

PostNov 22, 2022#1041

Can Congress actually do that? Railroad workers aren't government employees, although I guess they're considered essential workers. Seems downright un-American.

9,561
Life MemberLife Member
9,561

PostNov 22, 2022#1042

framer wrote:
Nov 22, 2022
Can Congress actually do that? Railroad workers aren't government employees, although I guess they're considered essential workers. Seems downright un-American.
i cant remember if its congress or Dept of Labor Secretary or the President but one of the 3 definitely can 

525
Senior MemberSenior Member
525

PostNov 22, 2022#1043

I think expecting congress to do anything in that short a time period is massively overestimating their ability to be responsive

1,868
Never Logs OffNever Logs Off
1,868

PostNov 22, 2022#1044

framer wrote:
Nov 22, 2022
Can Congress actually do that? Railroad workers aren't government employees, although I guess they're considered essential workers. Seems downright un-American.
Congress has that power under the Railway Labor Act.

Also, exploiting workers is extremely fundamentally American. Arguably the country's defining characteristic.

PostNov 22, 2022#1045

_nomad_ wrote:
Nov 22, 2022
I think expecting congress to do anything in that short a time period is massively overestimating their ability to be responsive
When it comes to protecting corporate profits Congress can be extremely efficient. Gay Marriage or Abortion Rights takes fifty years of debate but they'll block the strike on a unanimous voice vote at 2am if they have to.

525
Senior MemberSenior Member
525

PostNov 22, 2022#1046

MarkHaversham wrote:
Nov 22, 2022
_nomad_ wrote:
Nov 22, 2022
I think expecting congress to do anything in that short a time period is massively overestimating their ability to be responsive
When it comes to protecting corporate profits Congress can be extremely efficient. Gay Marriage or Abortion Rights takes fifty years of debate but they'll block the strike on a unanimous voice vote at 2am if they have to.
I'm sure you can point me to some sort of precedent to back that up. I can't see congress doing anything concerning the railroad crisis in the next couple weeks (or before the new congress is seated for that matter) besides maybe talking about it in committee.

2,929
Life MemberLife Member
2,929

PostNov 23, 2022#1047

Railroad strike is not currently priced into the stock market, i.e. Wall Street thinks it won't happen. 

Perspective on the implications of a strike is important here... A strike would start off costing the US economy $2BB/day. We'd see the energy, automotive, chemical, and consumer goods sectors & industries spiral out, and right as the Holidays are beginning. A long-term strike would take out Fourth Quarter GDP. I'm in favor of good contracts for the SMART-TD, the BLET, and the BMEWD, but I don't want to see 50K workers take out the US economy and get 10-25x as many other workers to lose their jobs directly because of their actions. Truly, it's the 36,000 members of SMART-TD that're against the updated contract; BLET and BMEWD voted in favor of the new agreement, they're just standing with SMART-TD today out of solidarity with other organized labor. All this is why the Congress has emergency powers, so the country can't be held economic hostage to a small but powerfully influential minority. 
MarkHaversham wrote: ... exploiting workers is extremely fundamentally American. Arguably the country's defining characteristic.
Funny that, on Thanksgiving Eve, our country's "sarcastic" defining characteristic is exploiting workers. 
I thought it would have been killing the American Indians. Smallpox is one hell of a legacy. 

Happy Turkey Day, y'all!

1,868
Never Logs OffNever Logs Off
1,868

PostNov 23, 2022#1048

gone corporate wrote:
Nov 23, 2022
Railroad strike is not currently priced into the stock market, i.e. Wall Street thinks it won't happen. 

Perspective on the implications of a strike is important here... A strike would start off costing the US economy $2BB/day. We'd see the energy, automotive, chemical, and consumer goods sectors & industries spiral out, and right as the Holidays are beginning. A long-term strike would take out Fourth Quarter GDP. I'm in favor of good contracts for the SMART-TD, the BLET, and the BMEWD, but I don't want to see 50K workers take out the US economy and get 10-25x as many other workers to lose their jobs directly because of their actions. Truly, it's the 36,000 members of SMART-TD that're against the updated contract; BLET and BMEWD voted in favor of the new agreement, they're just standing with SMART-TD today out of solidarity with other organized labor. All this is why the Congress has emergency powers, so the country can't be held economic hostage to a small but powerfully influential minority. 
MarkHaversham wrote: ... exploiting workers is extremely fundamentally American. Arguably the country's defining characteristic.
Funny that, on Thanksgiving Eve, our country's "sarcastic" defining characteristic is exploiting workers. 
I thought it would have been killing the American Indians. Smallpox is one hell of a legacy. 

Happy Turkey Day, y'all!
Rail workers don't make that much money; they shouldn't impoverish themselves and take bad deals out of some misbegotten solidarity with other workers who aren't willing to unionize. That's absurd. Workers are paid poorly because of Capital, not other workers. If other workers feel they are underappreciated, they should look to unions like SMART-TD as role models rather than as the enemy. Given the increase in retail unionization nationwide, I'd say many of them are doing just that. Let's be clear that the powerful influential minority holding the economy hostage here is not SMART-TD, it's Capital.

It's fair to say that indigenous Americans aren't exactly "workers", but they were still exploited and mistreated. And while they're still mistreated, I guess it feels less fundamental to the country's operation in the last century or so.

2,929
Life MemberLife Member
2,929

PostNov 28, 2022#1049

MarkHaversham wrote:
Nov 23, 2022
Rail workers don't make that much money; they shouldn't impoverish themselves and take bad deals out of some misbegotten solidarity with other workers who aren't willing to unionize. That's absurd. Workers are paid poorly because of Capital, not other workers. If other workers feel they are underappreciated, they should look to unions like SMART-TD as role models rather than as the enemy. Given the increase in retail unionization nationwide, I'd say many of them are doing just that. Let's be clear that the powerful influential minority holding the economy hostage here is not SMART-TD, it's Capital.

It's fair to say that indigenous Americans aren't exactly "workers", but they were still exploited and mistreated. And while they're still mistreated, I guess it feels less fundamental to the country's operation in the last century or so.
That's flat-out, 100% not what's going on here. 
  • The terms being contested cover paid time off and worker daily attendance record keeping. It's not over pay to keep themselves from being "impoverished". The existing deal provides a 24% pay increase over 5 years; additional personal days; and caps on health care costs. Again, the fight today is not over "Capital" but on PTO and managing time sheets. 
  • The median salary of a unionized railroad worker in 2021 was $64,150 per year, or $30.84 per hour. The 24% pay increases cited above will grow the annual to $79,546 and the hourly to $38.24. This is one of the most lucrative industries for workers who have a high school education or equivalent. We are clearly not talking about keeping people out of poverty. FYI I cite as my source the US Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Occupational Outlook Handbook
  • It's currently 4 unions against the deal, and 8 unions already signed up pro-deal. So, it's not non-union workers fighting unionized workers; there are twice as many unions standing for the deal than against it. The Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers and Trainmen are part of the 4 pro-strike unions, but that's only to stand in solidarity after originally being pro-deal. 
@MarkHaversham Recognize that I am not taking a pro-union or anti-union stance here. I'm giving analysis on the situation at hand. My primary concern is on how a strike will cost the US economy $2BB/day, increasing as it prolongs, and be negatively impactful to US GDP in the 4th Quarter. That's where I mentioned the role of an influential minority economically hurting the majority of the US population. What's obvious here is how much of this issue is actually known and unknown by commentators. 

1,106
Expert MemberExpert Member
1,106

PostNov 28, 2022#1050

^Nope, this is anti-union, you can have your opinion but don't try to pretend you're just a balanced neutral observer while spouting off bullet point after bullet point in favor of the rail carriers' position. It would be easy for rail carriers to grant their employees paid sick days at the very least, and the rail workers are not a minority, they are part of a working class majority. 

Read more posts (339 remaining)