48
New MemberNew Member
48

PostSep 04, 2008#426

I hope we hear something soon about this project. This one is about as important as there is. With the Alexa stalling, the Arcade and Sky house going under, and Park Pacific turning into apartments, we need a boost to public opinion about the future of downtown.



We were suppost to get word on this at the end of summer but have not heard anything yet. The skybridges have to come down. It really has an effect on the openness of downtown. Washington Avenue can be completed and Pine can start to get some life.



Is this going to happen or not?

10K
AdministratorAdministrator
10K

PostSep 04, 2008#427

aj2cb2000 wrote:Is this going to happen or not?


Good question. The sales office itself is not looking too good these days - bird droppings on the awnings, dying plants out front, etc.

5,705
Life MemberLife Member
5,705

PostSep 04, 2008#428

Another question directed at The Laural at the MX, You still got a job?



My understanding is that Spinnaker was still clearing some hurdles on securing legal ownership of the property. First and foremost, I'm sure the bankers will only open a construction loan if ownership is written in stone at this point. Stephen has nothing to more lose if he his trying to get a few more dollars wringed out of it. No loss for him if the project is delayed. Second, my concern is what's happening with the Embassy Suites deal. I got a lot more confidence in this project then any other loft project because of the hotel arrangement.



Too add a question while I'm thinking about it, what is the Mayor's office up to? They have been quiet. Hopefully they are not backing his old pal/campaign contributor. The city really needs someone like Spinnaker to move forward with the pieces in a big way.

25
New MemberNew Member
25

PostSep 07, 2008#429

Another question directed at The Laural at the MX, You still got a job?


Any news?

I just got an email from the Syndicate (about movie night) with a distribution list of my sales rep. from the Laurel. myLaurelRep@loftworks-stl.com

That can't be a good sign.

Also, he hasn't answered my emails asking about the progress of the construction loan and "Is the skybridge down?" (I'm from out of town).

My reservation check hasn't been cashed.

I'm starting to get a little worried.

93
New MemberNew Member
93

PostSep 07, 2008#430

I wonder if this maybe means that loftworks is going to work with Spinnaker to develop this project???

3,235
Life MemberLife Member
3,235

PostSep 07, 2008#431

Why doesnt someone just walk into their sales office and ask them whats going on?

25
New MemberNew Member
25

PostSep 07, 2008#432

Why doesnt someone just walk into their sales office and ask them whats going on?


That would be much appreciated ( I'm out of town ). Someone take a walk down Washington and I'll treat for a pizza slice (one total). The phone number gets the "Out of service" message but maybe they just haven't updated the web site. Or maybe I'll in advanced denial.



Laurel

Phone: 314-241-3900

Fax: 314-241-3901



Hours:

Monday & Friday: 11am — 5pm

Saturday & Sunday: 12pm — 4pm

2,430
Life MemberLife Member
2,430

PostSep 09, 2008#433

I think it would be a major confidence boost for this project if Loftworks signed on to oversee the development.

2,831
Life MemberLife Member
2,831

PostSep 17, 2008#434

Sad to say.



The sales center and entire first floor of the building were dismantled and moving trucks were there today. What is going on with this project now?

48
New MemberNew Member
48

PostSep 17, 2008#435

Does anyone know whats going on here?

4,489
Super ModeratorSuper Moderator
4,489

PostSep 17, 2008#436

^The economy is in the tank (i.e. AIG, Lehman, Merrill, GM, Fannie, Freddie, Bear Stearns, failed banks etc.) largely because of the housing mess. The housing market is abysmal and it appears that it will get worse before it gets better. While proposals are still happening, the only housing projects I think that are being built anywhere are ones that were already or nearly under construction, ones that had approved financing before the economy tanked or small housing developments. Developers seem to be now turning their attention to office development.



I am proud of what downtown St. Louis has been able to accomplish housing-wise before the credit crunch. And trust me, the Dillard's/St. Louis Centre complex will be renovated sooner or later.

10K
AdministratorAdministrator
10K

PostSep 17, 2008#437

Very, very, very disappointing, although not altogether surprising for the reasons AC mentioned.



Damn, I want to see that stupid skybridge come down so bad.

2,821
Life MemberLife Member
2,821

PostSep 17, 2008#438

As much as I'd like to live in the Laurel, I wouldn't pay what they were asking, which from what I've seen, was basically the former market rate with a good, but not huge, discount. Why would anyone, when, if they have enough cash in hand and great credit, there are sooooo many foreclosed properties on the market that can be had for a song?



Unfortunately, that is going to be the case for awhile until all of those properties are absorbed.

5,433
Super ModeratorSuper Moderator
5,433

PostSep 23, 2008#439

Arch City wrote:^The economy is in the tank (i.e. AIG, Lehman, Merrill, GM, Fannie, Freddie, Bear Stearns, failed banks etc.) largely because of the housing mess. The housing market is abysmal and it appears that it will get worse before it gets better.


Yes, it's going to be tough if not impossible to get any big-ticket project off the ground these days. (Ahem- Ballpark Village, anyone?)


I am proud of what downtown St. Louis has been able to accomplish housing-wise before the credit crunch. And trust me, the Dillard's/St. Louis Centre complex will be renovated sooner or later.


Dumb question- I assume the Mercantile Exchange is every bit as dead as The Laurel?



I agree with you about downtown progress and the inevitability of bigger and better things for the SB&F/Dillard's building and St. Louis Centre. However, I cannot think of a worse possible fate for this part of downtown. I believe this project, more than Ballpark Village, Lumiere Place, or any other major proposal, had the potential to transform downtown St. Louis, attract more residents, workers, shoppers, and tourists, and shift perceptions about what St. Louis can be. Instead, a set of buildings in the heart of downtown that are arguably the most significant eyesores will stand vacant, probably for several more years. Macy's, which now resides in a mostly empty Railway Exchange Building, may be in jeopardy as downtown development grinds to a halt. Then what?



I hate to be a pessimist, but this is a HUGE setback IMHO. :evil:



And we're still stuck with that blasted skybridge for who knows how long. :roll:

2,929
Life MemberLife Member
2,929

PostSep 23, 2008#440

We must all acknowledge that there really is nothing that could have been done to salvage the renovation at this time. There are giant problems with the most fundamental elements of the US economy, including and especially the credit markets. That such a large project is not going on now could have been predicted a while back.



My hope is not that this renovation is forever cancelled, but stalled out until we reach a more manageable level of total economic volatility and a reasonable softening in the credit markets. It is such a beautiful building, and such a prominent location, that we mustn't lose hope.



Still, this royally sucks, and we're stuck with those blocks being crap again for the near future.

1,517
Totally AddictedTotally Addicted
1,517

PostSep 23, 2008#441

Someone correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't the rental market better when the housing market tanks?



Why not do an all-rental project and cut some of the amenities that were planned just to get the project off the ground? Then, later, if housing demand goes up, the units could be turned over to for-sale and upgraded.

10K
AdministratorAdministrator
10K

PostSep 23, 2008#442

I've been wondering why Sherman would want to take on the Jefferson Arms as opposed to this project. You'd think having the Embassy Suites and some pre-sales lined up would make it easier to accomplish, and the location of the Laurel is better, IMO.

291
Full MemberFull Member
291

PostSep 23, 2008#443

It seems to me that it will be a lot easier/less expensive/less time to convert the Jefferson Arms into updated apartments than it will be to rehab The Laurel into apartments.

2,821
Life MemberLife Member
2,821

PostSep 23, 2008#444

^^Overall, I suspect it is because the Jefferson Arms presents a much better ROI. It will be less costly to convert the Jefferson Arms from below-market rate to a mix of market-rate and affordable apartments, plus a bit of ground floor retail.



True, The Laurel is in a more desirable location, but they are converting a former department store and space that has been empty for a long time into a mixed-use property. That isn't going to be easy. Plus, they have to deal with two huge and expensive issues:



First, is the very difficult and expensive demolition of the skybridge, which may have to be renegotiated between the new owners of the two properties. That includes the very touchy and expensive issue of how they are going to restore The Laurel facade, and the potential impact on historic tax credits.



Second, is the potential set of issues surrounding the former renovation attempt which created the atrium and cut massive holes in floors. It is going to take quite a bit of inspection and document review to determine whether or not it meets current code requirements and to determine that existing construction docs accurately represent the work performed.



The JA is large enough to be done in phases, requiring significantly less equity and capital upfront. That would be impossible with The Laurel. It would also be much easier to close off streets around the JA for construction staging purposes.



If The Laurel is dead, though, I wonder what other properties Embassy Suites might consider?

10K
AdministratorAdministrator
10K

PostSep 23, 2008#445

^

Good points.



With regards to the skybridge, a few years back, Downtown Now! was willing to pay Barry Cohen $400k to tear it down before he eventually sold St. Louis Centre and the Dillard's Building. I wonder if that offer still stands.

12K
Life MemberLife Member
12K

PostSep 24, 2008#446

How 'bout all of us Urban St. Louis Forum members get together and tear the damn thing down, Downtown Now gives us the $400,000, and we use the dough to fix the slow-speed problem on the Forum?

2,430
Life MemberLife Member
2,430

PostSep 24, 2008#447

I agree with others that the string of vacated buildings running from Olive to Delmar along 6th and 7th really does hurt the vibrancy of downtown. I had hopped that this project (along with Ballpark Village) would allow downtown to continue to make progress on revitalizing downtown even when most new projects dried up due to the slowing economy. Sad to hear.

8,912
Life MemberLife Member
8,912

PostOct 03, 2008#448

Project: The Laurel

$150 million, Downtown



Developer: Connecticut-based Spinnaker Cos.



Status: 212-room Embassy Suites, 190 residential units planned. Financing in flux, construction tentatively set for next Spring.



What They’re Saying:



“It’s an uphill battle,” Spinnaker’s Amos Harris said. “Getting financing, period, is tough. People are less willing to lend.”






http://stlouis.bizjournals.com/stlouis/ ... tml?page=1

10K
AdministratorAdministrator
10K

PostOct 03, 2008#449

Sounds like it's not dead! Dying, maybe, but not dead.

1,878
Never Logs OffNever Logs Off
1,878

PostOct 03, 2008#450

DeBaliviere wrote:Sounds like it's not dead! Dying, maybe, but not dead.


++



I think that's as positive as we're gonna get given the current economic situation.



-RBB

Read more posts (113 remaining)