It looks like a beautiful building.
But I think that wallpaper would give me a headache.
But I think that wallpaper would give me a headache.
DeBaliviere wrote:Those fabric valences were put up so long ago, they're actually kind of back in style again!
Thanks for your insight and it's not necessary nor appropriate to post the same information in multiple threads.
After posting on the above thread earlier today, I have been asked to repost my analysis of the delays in construction to the appropriate threads individually.
If the East St. Louis riverfront ever becomes something more than a wasteland
Framer wrote:Remember, a couple of Summers ago, the city closed the bridge deck for weekend food fairs. It tied up traffic and caused a general uproar. I doubt they'll do it again.
STLCityRes wrote:In addition to tearing down the skybridge over Washington Ave. near MX, has there ever been any discussion to turn the upper deck of the Eads Bridge into a recreational area, i.e. for walkers, joggers, bicyclists, tourists, etc.? I know the lower portion is used by the Metrolink, but with more residents moving downtown, it might be nice to use the upper area for recreational purposes. The views are great, its in a touristy area, and it doesn't seem like there is much car traffic.
STLCityRes wrote:Yes, I have walked/jogged here as well, but it's not so great when cars come whizzing by. And you can't easily go from the north side of the bridge to the south side. I was just thinking of some of the pedestrian bridges in Europe.
The Mayor's post stated that once the TIF is complete, construction is expected to commence. I suppose that's an unofficial yes.MidcoastSTL wrote:^ That is what I was wondering. Does this mean things are a go?
innov8ion wrote:The Mayor's post stated that once the TIF is complete, construction is expected to commence. I suppose that's an unofficial yes.MidcoastSTL wrote:^ That is what I was wondering. Does this mean things are a go?