766
Super MemberSuper Member
766

PostJan 15, 2008#76

Luftmensch wrote:The density fetish on this website is out of control. The most vibrant neighborhoods in New York City are mostly low-rise - even townhomes. Vast swathes of Lincoln Park in Chicago are also low, low, low. The "self-sufficient" towers are often soulless and dead and do nothing for their surroundings.



Be careful what you wish for.


Agreed. There is something about living in a high-rise -- it becomes very easy to go up the elevator, walk down the hall, into your 'vault', and then ignore everything around you. Compare to a midrise with stairs, where it's more common to talk across balconys, talk with neighbors in the hall or just outside.



Maybe it's the "elevator effect": When people who don't know each other are a distance away they will make eye contact, say hello, or some other acknowledgement. But put them close together in a confined space and they will act as if noone else is there.

1,400
Veteran MemberVeteran Member
1,400

PostJan 15, 2008#77

By density, I think some mean building density, i.e. having a building in every lot and having the majority of them open up to the street.

12
New MemberNew Member
12

PostFeb 22, 2008#78

stlmike wrote:By density, I think some mean building density, i.e. having a building in every lot and having the majority of them open up to the street.


I agree. Although I do think there should be some more high rises. I mean we are talking about Downtown.



Also, I do not like the GEW lofts at Washington and Jeffeson. They are what you see as you are traveling West down Washington. It's like Washington Ave is pointing at them and framing them. I just think it would be good if there was a better looking building there.

PostFeb 22, 2008#79

This is the effect I am refering to.


Arch City wrote:


Read more posts (-21 remaining)