I think the whole idea of moving out of the city would be a lot easier to swallow if it was in a close in suburb like U. City, Clayton or Maplewood. But Chesterfield, really? Talk about sterile. No transit connections (that are the slightest bit practical, at least), no hotels in walking distance (not that tourists looking for a fun weekend in St. Louis would stay out there anyway), no other nearby attractions to help draw a crowd. It's pretty sad. Obviously, there are things going on behind the scenes that are not being reported-- it's just too baffling and almost farcical. I don't think it's provincial to say that the city is where these festivals belong-- the city is the center of the region-- all highways and transit lines lead to downtown, there are lots of hotels and attractions to keep visitors and residents entertained for the weekend.robbie wrote:I'll start this by saying that I am resident of the city and was unhappy to hear that the Taste of SAINT LOUIS was moving out of St. Louis (proper). However, upon speaking to some other folks, I wonder if my initial reaction is a reflection of the extreme "localism" we seem to have here. If I want people from the county to support a vision of STL as one region, then why does it matter where in "St. Louis" this event takes place (with the understanding that Chesterfield is not currently a part of STL City)? While I would prefer the people and money they spend to be spent in the city, wouldn't it be better to lead with an example of the city and county working together to think more regionally?
As a side note, as other posters have mentioned, there probably is a much more simplistic (maybe logistic) reason why this is happening.
I'm really curious to know the backstory. Certainly it has to be related to the Board Bill 328.








