4,489
Super ModeratorSuper Moderator
4,489

PostNov 06, 2013#126

quincunx wrote:It's like a different planet. Something to aspire to.

Washington Post - As D.C. area developers gobble up land, Metro system poised to become more overwhelmed
Since the recession, real estate developers have been gobbling up Metro-accessible land and planning and building offices and apartments from Reston to New Carrollton. More than 12,000 new apartments became available in 2012 and a similar number will arrive this year, 3,000 units more than the previous high.
...
When 1812 North Moore Street is fully occupied, it likely will bring some 3,000 workers into the center of Rosslyn. The developer, Monday Properties, says it is committed to helping Metro expand and improve access. “We champion public transportation, as it is an essential component of our long-term Rosslyn redevelopment plan,” Tim Helmig, Monday executive vice president, said in an e-mail.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/business/ ... story.html
I hope transit options are expanded in the St. Louis region with TOD planned in conjunction with expansions.

It's bananas in Washington D.C.

Projects everywhere. EVERYWHERE.

Only Houston, at this time, can compare but not because of TOD.

Also, these new DC metro buildings aren't supertall structures either. With a real historic height restriction in place, the district as well as neighboring burbs, look good without the supertalls.

All downtown St. Louis and Midtown need are good mid-rise infills with maybe a few new 600-650' footers.

1,649
Totally AddictedTotally Addicted
1,649

PostNov 06, 2013#127

DC and Houston are both blowing up and because of exactly opposite reasons. The DC area is a giant gravy train of tax money, cronyism and government work. Houston is real money, government nurturing entrepreneurship, and grass-roots ideas and action.

Personally, neither town appeals to me but if St. Louis plans to blow up as well you can forget about copying the DC model. The DC model only works in DC. Technically, there's a tiny bit of St. Louis money behind every project in DC. A different planet indeed.

13K
Life MemberLife Member
13K

PostNov 06, 2013#128

Indeed we can't copy the DC model for attracting people because we can't move the nation's capital here!

We'll need a lot more wealth creation attracting a lot more people who want TOD-type housing and lifestyles or at least a housing market where TOD-type housing and neighborhoods compete well with car-oriented areas due to their downsides being more prominent as in the DC area..

4,489
Super ModeratorSuper Moderator
4,489

PostNov 06, 2013#129

leeharveyawesome wrote:DC and Houston are both blowing up and because of exactly opposite reasons. The DC area is a giant gravy train of tax money, cronyism and government work. Houston is real money, government nurturing entrepreneurship, and grass-roots ideas and action.

Personally, neither town appeals to me but if St. Louis plans to blow up as well you can forget about copying the DC model. The DC model only works in DC. Technically, there's a tiny bit of St. Louis money behind every project in DC. A different planet indeed.
I know the economic dynamics of DC and Houston are different, but it still doesn't change the fact that both cities are bananas when it comes to current development trends.

And who said anything about copying the economic development model of either city? However, St. Louis needs to pay close to attention to how TODs are being constructed in other cities. You can say what you want about DC, but their TODs would be awesome to emulate in St. Louis.

Also, I take issue with the assertion that every project in DC involves tax dollars. Perhaps so, but there are MANY projects in St. Louis that involve tax dollars, so what's the difference? Public officials and public workers have to have somewhere to work and live. They also need a way to get to work ie. public transit - especially in D.C.. If the government is doling out resources/breaks in public-private partnerships to build transportation, office and residential facilities - it's not an issue for me. They are making it happen with the resources they have available.

Also, tax dollars too is REAL MONEY. Second, DC is the government seat of the United States. I expect tax dollars to be spent there. Third, cronyism exists in St. Louis and in Jefferson City. It's all wrong, but DC is no different that Missourah or Illinois.

641
Senior MemberSenior Member
641

PostNov 06, 2013#130

I think we need to stop talking about DC and Houston. these are two top-7 metro areas in the US. Apples to oranges comparing them to STL. In fact, when I talk to my commercial real estate friends here, they all say the same thing: "all this spread-out metro area needs is couple million more people...."

4,489
Super ModeratorSuper Moderator
4,489

PostNov 06, 2013#131

Looking at peer cities/regions is okay, but I think it is also appropriate to evaluate economic development trends in larger metros when trying to build a healthier and more vibrant St. Louis.

13K
Life MemberLife Member
13K

PostNov 06, 2013#132

Here's one big problem. While changing dramatically the demand side of this may be out of reach (the "we just need one or two million more people bit"), I think we could as a region if we wanted change the supply side. Though we'd have to battle the "construction and demolition provides good jobs" lobby which not only screws up the housing market, but also transportation policy.


PostDec 02, 2013#133

Grand Station TOD form-based code. Is this a draft? Same old parking minimums abound. Can we even bear 0.9 spots per residential unit?

Too bad this wasn't in place before Doisy was built. Just hope they don't give variances if such a poor site plan is proposed again.

http://cmt-stl.org/wp-content/uploads/2 ... pdf?8d1446

PostDec 11, 2013#134

Delmar and FP station TOD plan final report

https://stlouis-mo.gov/government/depar ... anning.cfm

1,465
Veteran MemberVeteran Member
1,465

PostDec 11, 2013#135

Loved reading this...

"proposed regulations eliminate minimum off-street parking requirements to
encourage higher density, transit-oriented development. "

7,848
Life MemberLife Member
7,848

PostFeb 24, 2015#136

I was waiting for the blame when the story broke, now the update has it.

Woman at Club Fitness in Brentwood fends off 3:30 a.m. attacker
http://www.stltoday.com/news/local/crim ... d3a67.html
Greg Cenatiempo, vice president of Club Fitness, said another member held open the door and mistakenly let in the attacker, who apparently hid until later, when he was alone with the woman.

Cenatiempo said staffing is light overnight and employees often work in the back, cleaning up. But he said there was no employee present when this happened. One was due in at 4 a.m.

He said the entry system has a "tailgating system" that determines if two people enter on a single card swipe, and takes a photo that is emailed to the club manager. Members are warned that it is against policy to let anyone else in, and they can be fined $10.

Cenatiempo said the sensor took a still photo of the attacker that morning, which along with video surveillance was turned over to authorities.

Police said Deere, who was not a member, pulled the woman off a piece of exercise equipment and wrestled her to the floor. Deere said he intended to have sexual contact with her, according to a statement in court documents by Detective Richard Litschgi of the Brentwood police.

Police Maj. Jim McIntyre said, "She fought hard to get away." he added, "She ran one way and he ran another." The victim called police at 3:26 a.m.

The attacker was gone when officers arrived, but police arrested the suspect two days later at a McDonald's restaurant nearby, based on the description provided by the victim and surveillance video. Police said he has a distinctive tattoo. Detectives learned he had arrived in the St. Louis area last month from Hannibal.

Cenatiempo said the center will increase staffing in Brentwood because it is near a MetroLink station.

613
Senior MemberSenior Member
613

PostFeb 24, 2015#137

^I saw that too. F***ing mindboggling. It's MetroLink's fault some creepster from Hannibal made his way to Brentwood to assault a woman?

The underlying implications of that statement are infuriating.

Apparently, in St Louis problem people should be dumped in the city and be forced to stay there. Even if they aren't from there. Hence suburbanites love for the NLEC. God Bless America.

13K
Life MemberLife Member
13K

PostFeb 24, 2015#138

The trains don't run at 3:30 am

265
Full MemberFull Member
265

PostFeb 25, 2015#139

I am tired of the region being overly fearful of crime and blaming metro as a crime train. When would the fear stop :evil:

4,553
Life MemberLife Member
4,553

PostFeb 25, 2015#140

^^ That, and this: "there was no employee present when this happened. One was due in at 4 a.m."

Definitely MetroLink's fault.

2,437
Life MemberLife Member
2,437

PostFeb 25, 2015#141

When I read that I was thinking what an ignorant, idiotic statement that was. In this case, the intruder came from Hannibal, Missouri. Maybe they should beef up security because it's near a street??? Because he didn't ride the MetroLink from Hannibal. And definitely not at 3:30am as others have said. I feel embarrassed for that guy.

692
Senior MemberSenior Member
692

PostSep 09, 2022#142

This new apartment complex (top right in the image below) near the College Station in east Belleville is yet another housing development built near Metrolink but built as if the developers had no idea there was a transit station there.

It's a half-mile walk from the closest building to the College Station. But it involves walking along the shoulder of a 55-mph highway and crossing said highway.

It looks like it would've been pretty easy to build a path under the north side of the MetroLink overpass and connecting with said overpass. That'd also provide safe access to the MetroLink bike/walking trail, the college, the YMCA and the Walmart (without even having to walk through the Walmart parking lot), plus  all the other stuff over in that strip mall.

It's pretty infuriating to spend public money on transit while developments go up at almost every stop that totally ignore MetroLink or even the idea that one could get even a half a mile away without a car.
collegestation.jpg (363.36KiB)

1,792
Never Logs OffNever Logs Off
1,792

PostSep 09, 2022#143

^ Forget metrolink.  You'd think their tenants would appreciate a connection to the adjacent bike trail and access to the college.  Half the tenants are probably students at SWIC.  Expect a dirt trail to form shortly.

13K
Life MemberLife Member
13K

PostSep 09, 2022#144

No sidewalks, smh.

Read more posts (-6 remaining)