^Thanks for posting these Mark. The city should pay you.
This is great for convincing my friends to stick around.
This is great for convincing my friends to stick around.
There is pre-K for 3 and 4 years old and parents will sign up for their preferred schools in the fall the year prior and parents are notified January-ish if the child was selected. Some kids will be selected to a school but decide on other options, thus opening up more spots on the wait list for those not initially selected.JNOnSTL wrote:My wife & I are expecting our first baby in October. How early can you add a name to a school's waitlist?
Yeppers. By the way, Stix ECC is pretty much the same as Wilkinson with Constuctivist theory, etc. and both feed in to Humboldt. The big difference is that instead of being in Dogtown in an old school next to a park, Stix is in the BJC area in a newer building and is being surrounded by Shriner's Hospital, Cortex and IKEA. I tend to think that the school is responsible for all that growth!Mark Groth wrote:Expecting parents and young families, please do your research before you vacate for the county. Visit a school, talk to parents with kids in the school. You may be surprised.
So does anyone know what this guy wound up doing, and how it's been working?iowa09 wrote:My wife and I have two kids, a three year old and a 6 month old. We bought a house 2 years ago in Lindenwood Park and absolutely love living in South City. However, we are pretty bummed out about the limited options we have when it comes to sending out kids to school. We are not Catholic and therefore the plethora of Catholic primary schools around us really aren't an option. The St. Louis City schools are pathetic and currently there's only one decent option, Kenard which is a gifted primary school. However, Kenard is nearly impossible to get into so its not like we can set our hopes on that option. That basically leaves us with sending our kids to either a non-denominational or christian private school. However, these schools are all outrageously expensive. Westminster Academy in West County is 14K plus a year!!! So, based upon all of the above, we will likely have to move in a couple of years to Surburban hell in order to find a decent school district. It breaks my heart but I just don't see how we can continue living in the city.
So....are there any options I'm leaving out? My wife and I have researched this subject a bit but are looking for opinions from somebody else.
I know some people say living in Webster or Kirkwood is a good alternative to living in the City but home prices there are VERY steep. I'd have a very difficult time spending $400 K plus on a home that the same size as our home in the city that's almost $150 K less.
Charters are all free; some are neighborhood-based, some have lottery based on demand. I think generally what happens in new charters don't have a lottery but if it is perceived as successful (like Citygarden Montessori) then demand grows and there may be a lottery.onecity wrote:So...are these charters all 1) free, 2) neighborhood-based, and 3) non-lottery/waiting list?
I'm working on connecting with a family there...stay tuned. Another great option for St. Louis families!!! The numbers are growing. We need as many families to root down in the city as we can get.cngrant wrote:I would strongly encourage parents to consider Mallinckrodt if they are looking for an pre-K thru 5th grade elementary school in south city. Mallinckrodt is a relatively new St. Louis City magnet school. Though initially established as a "second" Kennard, it its distinct, with its own character. Parents, teachers, and administrators are pushing for experiential learning, structured recess, more science in the classroom, and expanded foreign language instruction. There is testing process for eligibility, and also the lottery for entry, but so far Mallinckrodt has been easier to get into than Kennard.
It is a complex issue and charters are far from a panacea. Too often, charter backers see this as a way to make money and leave kids behind. The for-profit Imagine Academy fiasco was a complete mess, and that ex-City Treasurer ghost employee taking tens of thousands was a more home-grown example. It is good that charters are finally getting some more oversight and I think the good ones welcome that.... we'll see if it is enough. (And let's not forget there are some excellent SLPS schools, including the second-best high school in the state.)quincunx wrote:I've been interested in the school voucher idea since I was a teenager. I wrote my term paper about it in AP English class. Would children be better served? Would the city be better off? I think so. The stigma of the public schools in the city is a huge drag. Knowing that you would have this option would be a relief to many who would like to live in the city. I really hate that many poor disadvantaged kids are stuck in the SLPS.
IndyStar - Indiana Supreme Court upholds school vouchers
http://www.indystar.com/article/2013032 ... %7Cmostcom
Maybe they aren't stuck. I don't know the income demographics of who left STL in the last census, but the city's median income increased. I assume wealthier people moved into the city to reap the benefits of city living while poorer people left for greener pastures to escape crime and bad schools. If that is the case, that demographic trend will probably continue since the "bad" school district could be causing families with no other options to leave, thus relieving some of the strain on SLPS, especially as wealthier people enter the city and increasingly gentrify it. The demographics will tip at some point, it's just a matter of when. But it will certainly accelerate once the national economy ramps up.I really hate that many poor disadvantaged kids are stuck in the SLPS.
Metro High has only 300 students. Clayton high has 836 and your kid gets in just because you live in the Clayton District. Marquette High School has 2274. Kirkwood High School has 1628. That's great for Metro, but parents want the assurance.roger wyoming II wrote:including the second-best high school in the state.)
I was simply comparing SLPS to charters..... what assurance do charters give compared to SLPS? As I said, some charters are good and others are a disaster; same as the SLPS. And as a whole I think SLPS beats the charters on testing. Hopefully they are getting better, as is the SLPS. And the success of Metro speaks for itself.... no charter has risen to that level.quincunx wrote:Metro High has only 300 students. Clayton high has 836 and your kid gets in just because you live in the Clayton District. Marquette High School has 2274. Kirkwood High School has 1628. That's great for Metro, but parents want the assurance.roger wyoming II wrote:including the second-best high school in the state.)