I was talking about social services as a global term, rather than stating that "only" homelessness was to blame for all the spending.Grover wrote:^ The largest budget outlays you cite (Social Security, Medicare/Medicaid) are not generally identified with "lazy" people and they are not entitlements that the majority of people attack, or want to see disappear. Placing "health" and "human services" together is simply a way to make something look like it costs more than military spending. And it makes it easy to villify spending on "social services" when in fact, less than 1% of our federal budget is spent on the homeless and welfare. The numbers can be bent and twisted, but when people assail the "welfare state" they use aggregate dollar amounts for corporate/mortgage/middle-class welfare to demonize spending on those who are needy.
I agree that taking "all" social services into account, overall spending on homeless may be < 1% of fed budget. It does not alter the fact that the leeches are taking money away from the ones who truly need that (the mentally disabled).
I have never been homeless and have perhaps not understood the spiral of decay that can afflict someone, but I do understand that able bodied people do have the opportunities not to be homeless. I have friends who are working 2 jobs to keep themselves afloat. Barely! but they are.













