2,772
Life MemberLife Member
2,772

PostAug 21, 2007#26

Just not very many jobs in IT, I have discovered :)

Actually, there isn't a huge shortage of IT jobs in St. Louis, just a great deal of competition.



Although I did have a promising phone interview today with a big company based in St. Louis...with awesome benefits, better pay than I make now, and tuition reimbursement :):):):):)



PRAY FOR ME!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! :lol:

11K
Life MemberLife Member
11K

PostAug 22, 2007#27

[-o<

5,433
Super ModeratorSuper Moderator
5,433

PostAug 22, 2007#28

[-o< Good luck Juice! 8)

2,772
Life MemberLife Member
2,772

PostAug 22, 2007#29

Keep it up! You all just scored me an on-site interview!!!! :o :D

2,430
Life MemberLife Member
2,430

PostOct 03, 2007#30

Employment is up, but so is unemployment

By David Nicklaus

10/02/2007 1:42 pm



It looks like we’re in one of those periods where the Labor Department’s two sets of statistics tell different stories, at least for the St. Louis metro area.



The metro unemployment rate, which is calculated from a survey of households, rose to 5.5 percent in August from 5.3 percent a year earlier. The household survey shows the number of job holders increasing, but not as fast as the number of people entering the labor force.



The Labor Department’s payroll data, compiled from a survey of employers, has much better news for St. Louis. (The payroll survey is generally considered the more reliable indicator of job growth.) It shows that the metro area added 21,700 jobs between August 2006 and 2007, for growth of 1.6 percent. St. Louis’ growth rate has accelerated in recent months after averaging just 1.0 percent in 2006 and 1.2 percent in 2005.




Link

2,331
Super ModeratorSuper Moderator
2,331

PostOct 03, 2007#31

JMedwick, I appreciate your analysis on these employment articles. Any thoughts on this?

2,430
Life MemberLife Member
2,430

PostOct 22, 2007#32

Metro area adds 16,000 jobs

By David Nicklaus

10/22/2007 10:37 am



The latest figures from the Bureau of Labor Statistics show that the St. Louis job market remained robust in September. The metro area added 16,000 jobs between September 2006 and September 2007, an increase of 1.2 percent.



That’s similar to the nation’s job-growth rate for the same period, and it continues a long winning streak. September was the:



* 38th straight month showing year-over-year job gains (the last decline was in July 2004)

* 35th straight month in which the year-over-year gain was at least 10,000 jobs.



The metro area has now added more than 50,000 jobs in the past four years.


Link



Good as always to see the Metro adding jobs. Given some of the blows in recent years (Ford and Macys) combined with potential future blows (Chrystler North Plant) it is good to see the region continuing to add jobs at a consistent rate that is inching closer to the national average.



I worry less about rising unemployment if it is a result of those who are not counted through in traditional unemployment statistics (such as those who are not looking for jobs {discouraged workers} or who are "under employed") finally being counted because the expanding job market is drawing more workers into the labor force. Ideally this is the case in St. Louis given the consistent positive news about jobs growth. If the labor force is growing in response to job growth, then rising unemployment is not such a bad thing.

PostOct 30, 2007#33

St. Louis unemployment moves to 5.2%

By David Nicklaus

10/30/2007 11:46 am



Metro St. Louis’ unemployment rate remained above the national average in September, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics. It rose to 5.2 percent from 4.8 percent in September 2006. (The rate was lower than August’s 5.5 percent, but the year-over-year comparison is more meaningful because the local figures are not seasonally adjusted.)



The nation’s seasonally unadjusted jobless rate was 4.5 percent in September. St. Louis’ unemployment rate has now been above-average in every month since May 2004, after a period of several years when we generally had lower-than-average unemployment.



As was the case in August, the metro area continues to get different signals from the BLS’ payroll and household surveys. The household survey, used to calculate the unemployment rate, shows that the number of unemployed people here rose by 7,400 between September 2006 and September 2007, while the number of job holders rose by 9,100. The payroll survey shows more robust job growth.


Link

PostNov 11, 2007#34

Some good thoughts (particularly those about a potential mismatch between jobs created and jobs lost) from Dave Nicklaus on the region's rising employment and unemployment.


Area's rising unemployment rate is a puzzle, as more jobs are created

By David Nicklaus

ST. LOUIS POST-DISPATCH

11/11/2007



For more than a decade, it was possible to summarize the health of the St. Louis economy in four words: Slow growth, low unemployment.



We weren't the kind of hot spot that attracted people to move in droves, but our industries were healthy enough to keep local residents gainfully employed.



In a remarkably consistent pattern, St. Louis' unemployment rate was below or equal to the national average in 144 of the 148 months between October 1991 and January 2004.



Sometimes our advantage was sizeable. In October 1999, a booming economy drove unemployment here down to 2.7 percent, compared with a national rate of 3.8 percent.



For some reason, the pattern has changed in the last three years. In every month since May 2004, the St. Louis unemployment rate has been above the national average.



In September, the metro area's unemployment rate was 5.2 percent and the nation's was 4.5 percent. (Because the Labor Department doesn't



provide seasonally adjusted figures for St. Louis, all of the national rates used here are unadjusted.)



Has the local economy changed in some important way? Should we be concerned?


Read More

PostNov 12, 2007#35

Region adds 700 new jobs despite unemployment numbers

Nearly all areas see increases



By Chris Coates

Sunday, November 11, 2007 7:00 AM CST



The region added about 700 positions to its workforce over the past year, a study of labor numbers by the state released last week found.



Statistics by the Illinois Department of Employment Security showed that about 243,600 people were employed in the Metro East in September, up from 242,900 in the same 2006 period.



The study, which calculates economic growth through surveys and filings, found trade, education, health care services and finance showed large gains, with smaller increases in manufacturing and retail.The study also found the region's unemployment rate increased from 4.4 percent in September 2006 to 5.5 percent last month, the third highest on a list of the 12 largest metro areas in the state.



The conditions are mirrored locally -- Madison County's unemployment was 5.3 percent, up from 4.2 percent. In St. Clair County, unemployment was at 6 percent, up from 5 percent.



Unemployment in Collinsville stood at 5.1 percent, up from 4 percent in September 2006, and 6 percent in Granite City, up from 5 percent a year ago.



Overall, the state added 43,600 new jobs, the largest growth among Midwestern states, the agency said.


Link



While the article only focuses on data from Illinois, it is interesting to consider. The article reports only a very small over-year growth (only 700 jobs) for the Illinois portion of the metro area, an area that comprises slightly less than 18% of the region's total employment (total regional employment of 1.377 million as reported by the BLS for September 2007). The BLS reported a total over the year employment increase of approximately 16,000 jobs from Sept 06-Sept 07 for the region as a whole.



Such a difference between the BLS numbers and the numbers from Illinois combined with the recent unemployment statistics creates quite a puzzle. Either the region is not growing as fast as the BLS data indicates or the employment growth in the region is mostly occurring in Missouri.

PostNov 26, 2007#36

St. Louis’ job gains continue

By David Nicklaus

11/26/2007 2:59 pm



Metro St. Louis added 19,800 jobs between October 2006 and October 2007, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics. That’s even better than the September-to-September gain, which was originally reported at 16,000 jobs and has now been revised upward to 18,600. The October figures amount to 12-month growth of 1.5 percent, compared with 1.2 percent for the nation as a whole.



The local unemployment rate will be released later this week, at which point we’ll see if the jobless-rate puzzle still exists.


Link

923
Super MemberSuper Member
923

PostNov 27, 2007#37

Seeing as you've made the last 5 posts in this thread (over the course of a month!) I'm going to give you the award for caring the most about a topic clearly no one else does. :?



C'mon folks - you got nothing?

6,663
AdministratorAdministrator
6,663

PostNov 27, 2007#38

I like to know this stuff, but there's not a whole lot to post about.

4,553
Life MemberLife Member
4,553

PostNov 27, 2007#39

Perhaps St. Louis's unemployment rate has fallen behind the rest of the country in the last 3-4 years because we haven't taken part in the residential real-estate boom, a very labor intensive industry. Construction provides the kind of jobs that can grow exponentially one year and disappear the next.

While we have continued our slow growth low-unemployment ways, much of the south and west have boomed and are now busting. So perhaps our stats will dip back under the national average as many regions start to see harsh year over year comparisons.

12K
Life MemberLife Member
12K

PostNov 27, 2007#40

Yep. The Tortoise vs. the Hare.

2,821
Life MemberLife Member
2,821

PostNov 27, 2007#41

MattnSTL wrote:I like to know this stuff, but there's not a whole lot to post about.
At least not until someone brings up religion, racism, homelessness, stem-cell research, or...*shudders*...PLAZA SQUARE! :lol:

2,430
Life MemberLife Member
2,430

PostNov 27, 2007#42

MattnSTL wrote:I like to know this stuff, but there's not a whole lot to post about.




Exactly. I post these knowing that there is very little discussion that will occur unless someone draws broad conclusions or the numbers are horrible (i.e. over the year job losses). Really just of an informational posting to keep folks up to date on where we stand.

6,663
AdministratorAdministrator
6,663

PostNov 27, 2007#43

^I actually do appreciate that. Sometimes I miss them.

3,311
Life MemberLife Member
3,311

PostNov 28, 2007#44

Construction provides the kind of jobs that can grow exponentially one year and disappear the next.

While we have continued our slow growth low-unemployment ways, much of the south and west have boomed and are now busting. So perhaps our stats will dip back under the national average as many regions start to see harsh year over year comparisons.




Hmmm. right to work states and no labor unions.. hmmm... Read Urban Land Institute's "Emerging Trends" if you think I'm making this up. I know there are labor union lovers all over this forum, but please just go read what the experts (ULI) say about the "hot real estate markets to invest in". St. Louis is 5th or 6th from BOTTOM in the top 30. Sad, but true, apparently.

http://www.uli.org/AM/Template.cfm?Sect ... uctid=1681

10K
AdministratorAdministrator
10K

PostNov 28, 2007#45

MattnSTL wrote:^I actually do appreciate that.


Same here.

2,430
Life MemberLife Member
2,430

PostNov 29, 2007#46

Two new articles:


The unemployment puzzle persists

By David Nicklaus

11/28/2007 11:57 am



The Bureau of Labor Statistics’ latest figures on metro-area unemployment are out today, and they don’t resolve the puzzle about the St. Louis economy. Even as St. Louis’ job growth remains strong, its unemployment rate rose to 5.3 percent in October from 4.6 percent a year earlier.


Link


Here’s what we know about job quality, and it isn’t all bad

By David Nicklaus

11/28/2007 3:16 pm



A commenter on a previous post asks whether the jobs being created these days are quality ones, adding that “for an increasing number of average folks, it takes two or three of these ‘new jobs’ to equal what we used to get in just one.”



The quality-jobs question is difficult to answer, because the Labor Department’s payroll survey, the primary source of job-growth numbers, gives us only average wages for fairly broad categories of workers. It doesn’t tell us whether the new hires are coming in above the average or below it.



The issue has been studied a lot, though. Here’s an excerpt from a column I wrote in July 2004, when the quality of jobs was being raised as a political issue:



Another monthly Labor Department report, the household survey, provides far more detail. Here, the government’s statisticians break down the work force both by industry and by occupation.



Two recent analyses, by Business Week magazine and by the University of Pennsylvania’s Annenberg Public Policy Center, sliced that data into 154 different job categories, such as managers who work in the construction industry or salespeople who work in the financial industry.



They looked at the numbers in slightly different ways, but came to essentially the same conclusion. Business Week found that 65 percent of new jobs in the past year have been in categories that pay above the median wage. The Annenberg Center found that virtually all the new jobs were in higher-paying categories, with no growth in low-wage jobs.



The shift from manufacturing to services has been going on for a long time. But what people miss is that the service sector has highly skilled jobs, too.



“Doctors, teachers and nurses are growing faster than Wal-Mart clerks,” says Brooks Jackson, director of Annenberg’s Political Fact Check project and author of its jobs study.



I don’t know of more recent research along these lines, but if I find any, I’ll share it here.


Link



All in all pretty interesting news, though I think Nicklaus is blowing this whole "jobs puzzle" angle a bit out of proportion. Until the end of year numbers come out in February or March 2008 we won't know the true tale on job growth. That said, there are many plausible and positive reasons to have both higher levels of unemployment and increasing employment totals that make it far less puzzling.



The most interesting of the ideas though is the one Nicklaus threw out a few weeks back: people loosing their jobs are in manufacturing but large employment gains are occurring in segments such as health care, FIRE, and other white collar professions, thereby creating a mismatch between those loosing their job and jobs available.

PostJan 24, 2008#47

Some more interesting and positive job growth news served with a dose of caution:


St. Louis continues strong job growth

By David Nicklaus

01/23/2008 12:21 pm

Even as the national economy slowed in December, metro St. Louis continued to add jobs at a healthy pace. At least, so say the preliminary numbers from the Bureau of Labor Statistics. St. Louis added 24,500 jobs between December 2006 and December 2007, one of the healthier year-over-year increases we’ve seen recently. By comparison, the gain in calendar 2006 was just 13,600 jobs.


Read More



As an interesting side note, the over the year numbers from the BLS posted earlier in January show an increase of approximately 20,800 jobs from November 2006 to November 2007, a growth of 1.5% over the year. For comparison, such a number would put St. Louis just a bit behind Charlotte's 1.8%, Phoenix's 1.6%, and Denver's 1.8%, while well ahead of Minneapolis- St. Paul's .3%, Cincinnati's .3%, an Detroit's -1.7%.

1,585
Totally AddictedTotally Addicted
1,585

PostJan 24, 2008#48

That's good company to be in, 3 rapidly growing cities.



Weren't the original projections for losses?

2,430
Life MemberLife Member
2,430

PostJan 29, 2008#49

As a counterpoint to the above, the BLS today released info on unemployment in St. Louis:



STL-area unemployment jumps in Dec.

By Tim Logan

01/29/2008 10:28 am

The St. Louis-area unemployment rate lept again in December, according to numbers out this morning from the Bureau of Labor Statistics.



The metro area recorded a jobless rate of 5.4 percent for the month, up from 4.5 percent in December, 2006. It’s also up from 5.1 percent in November, 2007, though the numbers are not seasonally adjusted. The national average for December was 4.8 percent, up from 4.3 percent last year.



The region added just 9,600 non-farm jobs over the year, a 1 percent increase.


Read More

PostFeb 27, 2008#50

St. Louis is likely to lose thousands of jobs it never had

By David Nicklaus

ST. LOUIS POST-DISPATCH

02/27/2008



Get ready for some bad news, St. Louis: The metro area is about to lose several thousand jobs.



No, I don't have an inside tip about a major round of layoffs or a headquarters leaving town. But I have talked to Howard Wall, one of the most astute readers of local employment statistics, and he says that the government's published numbers for last year simply don't add up.



The Bureau of Labor Statistics will issue a revised set of employment numbers on March 11, covering last year and part of 2006. Wall, a vice president and economist at the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, says the revision is likely to be large and negative.



The BLS' preliminary estimate says metro St. Louis added 24,500 jobs last year, which would be the area's biggest gain since 1997. Furthermore, the statistics show the number of workers here growing by 1.8 percent, more than double the national growth rate of 0.8 percent.



Keep in mind that St. Louis employment grew just 1 percent in 2006. As the national economy slowed last year, is it likely that St. Louis accelerated by so much?


From the same article.


For St. Louis, the revisions are often huge. The initial estimate for 2003 showed a loss of 4,500 jobs, but that eventually became a gain of 13,800.



In 2004, we looked like one of the hottest job markets in the nation. That only lasted until our initial gain of 38,800 jobs got revised down to 11,600.



For 2007, Wall predicts, the revised numbers will show a gain of between 7,300 and 10,700 jobs. At the high end, that would put us right in line with the nation's 0.8 percent growth rate.



Those aren't boom town numbers, but, hey, average isn't so bad.




Read More





It will be interesting what the BLS data released in early March (11th I think) shows for St. Louis job growth.

Read more posts (37 remaining)