953
Super MemberSuper Member
953

PostAug 13, 2025#326

New Noise Cameras Pit Drivers of Fast Cars Against Their Neighbors
Traffic police deploy new technology—and steep fines—to combat roaring mufflers, revving engines and blaring stereos
https://archive.ph/q8jIw

13K
Life MemberLife Member
13K

PostAug 29, 2025#327

NextSTL - 25/20: Setting Safer Speed Limits in St. Louis

https://nextstl.com/2025/08/25-20-setti ... -st-louis/

PostSep 18, 2025#328

BB62 - Regulating the Operation Of Golf Carts upon the Streets, Alleys, And Public Right-Of-Way within the City Of St. Louis.

https://www.stlouis-mo.gov/government/c ... BBId=16718

2,260
Life MemberLife Member
2,260

PostSep 24, 2025#329

https://www.reddit.com/r/StLouis/s/HHGEKYYc11

The median, car brained voter.

13K
Life MemberLife Member
13K

PostSep 24, 2025#330

Everyday there's a driving sucks or car ownership sucks post on there, but they can't imagine a different way

2,260
Life MemberLife Member
2,260

PostSep 24, 2025#331

quincunx wrote:
Sep 24, 2025
Everyday there's a driving sucks or car ownership sucks post on there, but they can't imagine a different way
I like how, in the picture, you can literally see cars turning off of Southwest onto Kingshighway. This person is literally posting on reddit about how upset they are that they are stuck in traffic and that sometimes, other cars get priority over them.

PostSep 25, 2025#332

https://www.firstalert4.com/2025/09/24/ ... er-groves/

St. Louis County, Webster Groves to redesign Big Bend Road. The $2.5 million plan calls for a lane reduction, more street parking, more cross walks, and sidewalk improvements.

Construction should begin in 2027.

13K
Life MemberLife Member
13K

PostOct 11, 2025#333

BB77 would set the speed limit on Kingshighway from MLK to Bircher near I70 to 25 mph.

https://www.stlouis-mo.gov/government/c ... BBId=16736

1,108
Expert MemberExpert Member
1,108

PostOct 11, 2025#334

Won't matter unless SLPD feels like enforcing speeding ever again. 

2,632
Life MemberLife Member
2,632

PostOct 11, 2025#335

Even without enforcement, lowering speed limits would still blunt average speeds somewhat. Plus we get a better score on that bike city ranking website

2,260
Life MemberLife Member
2,260

PostOct 28, 2025#336

https://fox2now.com/news/missouri/drive ... gshighway/

Brain rot segment from Fox 2.

I actually use Kingshighway now because it's that much more enjoyable and I love that it's actually what I'd define as an urban street.

Typical median Americans: b**** about the streets being poor, keep b*tching when they get fixed. And the news runs both as segments.

1,680
Totally AddictedTotally Addicted
1,680

PostNov 03, 2025#337

It's insane how just upgrading the infrastructure makes me feel about this stretch.  Maybe it was hitting crumbling roads every morning on my commute, coupled with the general distress.  But, just getting fresh pavement feels like a little new lifeblood for this area and could go a long way Downtown in refreshing street level experience.  Even the 'Bud's parking lot' getting cleaned up, Kingswa revamp, just feels like the City investing in it changed how I felt about it even still as a utilitarian auto-centric road. 

What a pointless story.  Who is crashing into these concrete barriers? Is this an actual thing?

1,614
Totally AddictedTotally Addicted
1,614

PostNov 03, 2025#338

Yes, wife works downtown and we laugh because we’ve seen 3-4 people hit them live.

6,123
Life MemberLife Member
6,123

PostNov 04, 2025#339

I'm not completely thrilled with the Kingshighway treatment. It could have been so much better. For starters, it needs a good half dozen traffic circles and about the same number fewer signalized intersections. But you know what? It's a whale of a lot better than it was. And almost entirely because we put our feet down and insisted on lane reductions, an island next to the park, and some real, sensible, pedestrian infrastructure. Without that it really would have been a lost cause. Road diets work. Good design makes streets safer for everyone. Speed humps? Traffic circles? Sidewalk level road crossings that require the car to move up and over? Sign me up.

1,642
Totally AddictedTotally Addicted
1,642

PostNov 12, 2025#340

Well, they've done just as much as possible with the disgraceful Russell Gravois I-55 intersection thing. Much green paint, a variety of curbs and medians. Other than turning back the clock and never building an Interstate exchange or a targeted small bomb there is really not much more that can be done to make it not horrible. Many speeding, distracted or just bad drivers will get some popped tires in the future which is totally fine with me. I can see an out control driver hitting one of the median curb things and being projected in the air and landing down on 55 section sometime which will be horrible.

The near South side connectivity to downtown really had the triple whammy of things that makes it difficult  - interstates and worse, interstate ramps, a large set of trains tracks, and a large public housing project. Bad choices that must be overcome somehow.

13K
Life MemberLife Member
13K

PostNov 12, 2025#341

Pics?

2,260
Life MemberLife Member
2,260

PostNov 12, 2025#342

leeharveyawesome wrote:
Nov 12, 2025
Well, they've done just as much as possible with the disgraceful Russell Gravois I-55 intersection thing. Much green paint, a variety of curbs and medians. Other than turning back the clock and never building an Interstate exchange or a targeted small bomb there is really not much more that can be done to make it not horrible. Many speeding, distracted or just bad drivers will get some popped tires in the future which is totally fine with me. I can see an out control driver hitting one of the median curb things and being projected in the air and landing down on 55 section sometime which will be horrible.

The near South side connectivity to downtown really had the triple whammy of things that makes it difficult  - interstates and worse, interstate ramps, a large set of trains tracks, and a large public housing project. Bad choices that must be overcome somehow.
If you don't like all this, why do you support the pro-build more of it party?

1,108
Expert MemberExpert Member
1,108

PostNov 14, 2025#343

Went to an open house last night about redoing Lindell between Vandeventer and Kingshighway.

Not sure about the timeline but the two configurations they're considering are:
1) Redo Lindell w 3 traffic lanes, 2 parking lanes and a 2-way cycle track on the south side of the street with bike lanes 5 feet wide each way
2) Redo Lindell w 3 traffic lanes, 1 parking lane on the north side of the street and 2 6 foot wide bike lanes on both sides of the street

I was in favor of 2, but the majority of people there seemed to favor 1 because they wanted to keep the parking lane on the south side of the street. I was disappointed mid block crosswalks, like an old Nextstl article suggested, were not already in the plan. There was opportunity for additional comments, where I did make the case for mid-block crossings (especially between Vandeventer & Sarah because that block is exceedingly long and Euclid & Taylor where the density really warrants it) but I'm not optimistic they'll be added because of just a few comments. It'd also be good to have the walk signals be automatic rather than having the beg button, and an all-way pedestrian signal (where the signal is red for all cars) at Lindell/Euclid with its high foot traffic.

Would've been nice to see BRT/bus lanes evaluated too but it didn't surprise me considering the sorry state of our bus system.

22
New MemberNew Member
22

PostNov 14, 2025#344

Excited to hear about the lane reductions. I like the modifications they have made to the east in some locations. Lindell has the potential to be such a great, iconic street. 

2,632
Life MemberLife Member
2,632

PostNov 18, 2025#345

I would be happy with either plan, but still strongly prefer #2 as a two way bike lane on a street that size would be much more dangerous

13K
Life MemberLife Member
13K

Post1:13 PM - Apr 03#346

So more than just the one corner by the Hilton, smh.

After years of drivers speeding down too wide streets wreaking havoc, they finally do something, then they're removef at the first whines of entitled drivers.

StlMag - Bumpout removal in downtown St. Louis has advocates crying foul

https://www.stlmag.com/news/bumpout-rem ... -st-louis/

KMOV - ‘Massive choke points’: Mayor Spencer defends decision to remove bumpouts downtown; Safety advocates not happy

https://www.firstalert4.com/2026/04/03/ ... not-happy/

1,108
Expert MemberExpert Member
1,108

Post1:29 PM - Apr 03#347

Honestly the most infuriating thing about this for me is how putting those traffic calming measures in place requires an eternity of studies, "community engagement" and applying for grants whereas removing them is easy as the Mayor got some bad press, makes unilateral and unpublicized decision to remove them by night. What a terrible mayor Cara has been.

13K
Life MemberLife Member
13K

Post4:42 PM - Apr 03#348

NextSTL - Driver entitlement trumps public safety in St. Louis

https://nextstl.com/2026/04/driver-enti ... -st-louis/

Post7:33 PM - Apr 03#349

StlToday - Downtown curb 'bump-out' removal sparks outrage in St. Louis. 'It was a mess,' mayor says

https://www.stltoday.com/news/local/gov ... 18e9f.html

6,123
Life MemberLife Member
6,123

Post5:21 AM - Apr 04#350

^I think what she means to say is "It is a mess." Got the tense wrong there.

Read more posts (1 remaining)