2,772
Life MemberLife Member
2,772

PostJan 28, 2009#51

ginbudjim wrote:Come on people it should be banned immediately and you know it. It's disgusting, filthy, offensive, and unhealthy without question. And don't tell me it's no more offensive blah blah blah than speeding or running a stop sign. Your smoke is just as offensive to me as this would be to you if I walked over to your restaurant table and crapped on your plate of steak and lobster. Oh, well then you say, I just should just not go to those establishments where smoking is permitted, simple as that. Well wait a minute, I should have a right to crap anywhere I want just like you think you should have the right to smoke anywhere you want !!


My IQ just took a big hit after reading this.

2,929
Life MemberLife Member
2,929

PostFeb 01, 2009#52

JuiceInDogtown wrote:
ginbudjim wrote:Come on people it should be banned immediately and you know it. It's disgusting, filthy, offensive, and unhealthy without question. And don't tell me it's no more offensive blah blah blah than speeding or running a stop sign. Your smoke is just as offensive to me as this would be to you if I walked over to your restaurant table and crapped on your plate of steak and lobster. Oh, well then you say, I just should just not go to those establishments where smoking is permitted, simple as that. Well wait a minute, I should have a right to crap anywhere I want just like you think you should have the right to smoke anywhere you want !!


My IQ just took a big hit after reading this.
Cigarettes expire after about five minutes. Idiocy can last forever.



Focus: I'm a smoker who frequents bars and restaurants. Some background on a smoker's etiquette:

- I am considerate enough to not smoke around non-smokers, from remaining only in the smoking section to securing that passing smoke doesn't inadvertently blow into a fellow patron's or bartender's face.

- I do not smoke when eating. When the food arrives, the butt is extinguished.

- I do not smoke cigars or pipes in public.

- I will give a smoke to a non-smoker who asks politely. And, there are many of you who want one and ask to bum one after a couple drinks, even though you claim you never light up and in fact advocate for a total ban, until you really want one.

- My smoke is quiet. Your child is not.

- My smoke goes great with a beer. Your faux coughing does not.

- Smoke eaters are mandatory in restaurants.

- Outdoor smoking decks, such as those at Church Key, Nick's, etc. are a great compromise. Focus on mutually beneficial solutions over bans of a legal and enjoyed addictively delicious habit.



Main Point: If county smokers can't smoke in county restaurants, they will be more apt to frequent restaurants where they can smoke in the city. When this bill went around last in 2005, it was shut down because county restauranteurs were solidly against it. If businesses feel they will be hurt, they will vote against it again.

59
New MemberNew Member
59

PostFeb 01, 2009#53

Gone Corporate wrote:Main Point: If county smokers can't smoke in county restaurants, they will be more apt to frequent restaurants where they can smoke in the city.


Maybe near the city limits, but I think general laziness will trump the necessity of having to drive an extra 20 miles round trip just to puff on a cigarette during a one hour meal.

2,772
Life MemberLife Member
2,772

PostFeb 02, 2009#54

blueeyes wrote:
Gone Corporate wrote:Main Point: If county smokers can't smoke in county restaurants, they will be more apt to frequent restaurants where they can smoke in the city.


Maybe near the city limits, but I think general laziness will trump the necessity of having to drive an extra 20 miles round trip just to puff on a cigarette during a one hour meal.
Don't count on it, I went out with a smoker friend last night with our wives. He smoked from the house to the car, from the car to the restaurant, from the restaurant to the car, ran in to Target (literally ran, bathroom emergency), smoke from Target to car (we picked him up at the curb), smoked from car to theater, smoked from theater to car, and then chain smoked at his house. He is 26.



Point being, never under estimate the ambition of a great smoker!

10K
AdministratorAdministrator
10K

PostFeb 03, 2009#55

JuiceInDogtown wrote:Don't count on it, I went out with a smoker friend last night with our wives. He smoked from the house to the car, from the car to the restaurant, from the restaurant to the car, ran in to Target (literally ran, bathroom emergency), smoke from Target to car (we picked him up at the curb), smoked from car to theater, smoked from theater to car, and then chain smoked at his house. He is 26.



Point being, never under estimate the ambition of a great smoker!


Enjoy your time with him now, 'cause at that pace, he might be dead in a few years.

59
New MemberNew Member
59

PostFeb 03, 2009#56

JuiceInDogtown wrote:Don't count on it, I went out with a smoker friend last night with our wives. He smoked from the house to the car, from the car to the restaurant, from the restaurant to the car, ran in to Target (literally ran, bathroom emergency), smoke from Target to car (we picked him up at the curb), smoked from car to theater, smoked from theater to car, and then chain smoked at his house. He is 26.



Point being, never under estimate the ambition of a great smoker!


smoke.gif More doctors smoke Camels than any other cigarette. smoke.gif


8,908
Life MemberLife Member
8,908

PostFeb 12, 2009#57

Look for Clayton to be Next.



Clayton to target smoking



CLAYTON — This city could become the next local community to snuff out smoking in public places.



Mayor Linda Goldstein and a majority on the city's Board of Aldermen appear almost ready to enact a ban in their own restaurant-heavy city.



"It's the right thing to do," said Alex Berger III, one of the city's six aldermen. "I sense in our community there is significant support for a smoking ban."



The issue was discussed Tuesday night at an aldermanic meeting. The officials decided a ban was an idea worth pursuing and intend to organize public meetings and surveys to find out what residents and businesses, especially restaurants, want.



They will look at five different forms of smoking bans. The most restrictive would ban smoking entirely indoors at public places and at their outdoor entryways. The least restrictive would require indoor restaurants to be smoke-free, but not outdoor patios, hotels or tobacco stores.



article

11K
Life MemberLife Member
11K

PostFeb 12, 2009#58

Sweet baby Jesus - perhaps a tidal wave is looming.

2,093
Life MemberLife Member
2,093

PostFeb 12, 2009#59

I'm still kind of torn on smoking bans. I would love for all restaurants and bars to be smoke free but I have a problem with the govt. telling them they have to be.



And I don't think patios, beer gardens, etc. should have to be smoke free. Hotels? Why should smoking be allowed there if not restaurants and bars?





As for tobacco stores-- :roll: If you hate smoke whaddya doin' in a tobacca store in the first place?



Since there are no casinos in Clayton at least we don't have to deal with someone wanting an exception for those!

2,772
Life MemberLife Member
2,772

PostFeb 13, 2009#60

How about this instead; post flyers all over town; if you don't smoke or don't want smoking in restaurants, don't go to any smoking restaurants for one week. See if they give.



If people say "I will not go there if you allow smoking," they will ban smoking, assuming they have a larger clientele of non-smokers in comparison to smokers and their business suffers.



Hey, government, let us speak for ourselves.

8,908
Life MemberLife Member
8,908

PostApr 28, 2009#61

Dear XXXXX



The City of Clayton is engaged in public dialogue about restrictions on smoking in our community. On April 28 and May 12, the City will hold public hearings to obtain opinions from community stakeholders.



the April 28th hearing is reserved for comments from Clayton residential citizens only the May 12th hearing is reserved for comments from Clayton business owners (business owners or persons who work in Clayton) or their representatives only

923
Super MemberSuper Member
923

PostMay 01, 2009#62

ginbudjim wrote:Come on people it should be banned immediately and you know it. It's disgusting, filthy, offensive, and unhealthy without question. And don't tell me it's no more offensive blah blah blah than speeding or running a stop sign. Your smoke is just as offensive to me as this would be to you if I walked over to your restaurant table and crapped on your plate of steak and lobster. Oh, well then you say, I just should just not go to those establishments where smoking is permitted, simple as that. Well wait a minute, I should have a right to crap anywhere I want just like you think you should have the right to smoke anywhere you want !!


Well I think double bacon cheeseburgers topped with extra bacon fat and deep fried are disgusting and unhealthy. Should we ban that? Should we ban contact sports because they're dangerous? If a mother smokes in a home with a child, is that child abuse? Can we call her an unfit mother and take her child away from her just because she smokes in the house? What about alcohol? Alcohol related deaths number in the tens of thousands each year. Should we try prohibition again, since it worked so well the last time?



I hope you realize that given the level of e-coli in feces, your dump on my plate is actually more potentially harmful than a roomful of cigarette smoke and me taking deep breaths.



I don't mind feeding trolls, I just give them gristle to chew on.

11K
Life MemberLife Member
11K

PostMay 01, 2009#63

migueltejada wrote:Well I think double bacon cheeseburgers topped with extra bacon fat and deep fried are disgusting and unhealthy. Should we ban that?


The day that someone blows their double bacon cheeseburger topped with extra bacon fat and deep fried in my face (or more likely the day said sandwich floats through the air and makes everyone in the room less healthy), yes.

1,610
Totally AddictedTotally Addicted
1,610

PostMay 01, 2009#64

Grover wrote:
migueltejada wrote:Well I think double bacon cheeseburgers topped with extra bacon fat and deep fried are disgusting and unhealthy. Should we ban that?


The day that someone blows their double bacon cheeseburger topped with extra bacon fat and deep fried in my face (or more likely the day said sandwich floats through the air and makes everyone in the room less healthy), yes.




Touché! Although, if one continues to eat double bacon cheeseburgers, it SHOULD be illegal to wear tight/stretchy clothes...that does impact the rest of us.

10K
AdministratorAdministrator
10K

PostMay 01, 2009#65

Grover wrote:
migueltejada wrote:Well I think double bacon cheeseburgers topped with extra bacon fat and deep fried are disgusting and unhealthy. Should we ban that?


The day that someone blows their double bacon cheeseburger topped with extra bacon fat and deep fried in my face (or more likely the day said sandwich floats through the air and makes everyone in the room less healthy), yes.


As Jim Rome once said, "Nobody ever got sick from second-hand hot fudge."

11K
Life MemberLife Member
11K

PostMay 01, 2009#66

^ Although if one were to eat second-hand hot fudge it could reasonably be concluded that they may get sick. (sorry, slow Friday at the office)

9
New MemberNew Member
9

PostMay 24, 2009#67

I can't stand all this BS about how businesses and bars will lose traffic due to a smoking ban. Massachusetts has had a state-wide ban on ALL public places for years, and trust me, the bars are plenty full. First off, you can't just assume all smokers are bar people. And if they can't quit smoking, well then I doubt they'll just give up drinking. When I moved here in August, I totally forgot that in some places they actually allow people to smoke indoors, and it was disgusting. Health effects aside, it's simply gross to have cigarette smoke in public places.

8,908
Life MemberLife Member
8,908

PostMay 24, 2009#68

^further proof of the wussification of america.

9
New MemberNew Member
9

PostMay 24, 2009#69

Excuse me? I'm a wuss because I prefer to eat and be otherwise entertained in a non-toxic environment?

8,908
Life MemberLife Member
8,908

PostMay 25, 2009#70

Kennedy22 wrote:Excuse me? I'm a wuss because I prefer to eat and be otherwise entertained in a non-toxic environment?




Not you specifically, but more our society in general. 8)

PostMay 25, 2009#71

Kennedy22 wrote:I can't stand all this BS about how businesses and bars will lose traffic due to a smoking ban. Massachusetts has had a state-wide ban on ALL public places for years, and trust me, the bars are plenty full. First off, you can't just assume all smokers are bar people. And if they can't quit smoking, well then I doubt they'll just give up drinking. When I moved here in August, I totally forgot that in some places they actually allow people to smoke indoors, and it was disgusting. Health effects aside, it's simply gross to have cigarette smoke in public places.


First of all, the bordering restaurants are the ones who are complaining the patrons will go somewhere else. For example, when Clayton bans smoking tomorrow, many of the patrons will simply go right down the street to richmond heights, ladue, university city, maplewood, brentwood, or stl city establishments. A city or county ban is no the same as a state wide ban.

I guess we'll see how this all plays out over the next few months. I hope the businesses of Clayton thrive and become a trend setter for the region, however I could see quite the opposite.



While I agree that I don't want smoke in my face while i'm eating, nearly every restaurant I patronize is either non smoking, or they have a seperate smoking sectiong, therefore it doesn't tend to bother me. We all know 2nd hand smoke can kill, but unless you have some type of respitory disorder, I don't think being around a little smoke every now and then is that big of a deal.

Let me reiderate that I'm not a smoker, however I'm not against having a few heaters while drinking.

All in all I'm all for some of our local establishments going smoke free, however I don't think it should be the decision of the government. I believe it should be the decision of the individual proprietor.

3,429
Life MemberLife Member
3,429

PostMay 26, 2009#72

Clayton is banning smoking in restaurants starting June 26? I hadn't heard this. I'll have to start going to restaurants there. Now we go from Kirkwood out to Buffalo Wild Wings in Balwin, where smoking is banned.

10K
AdministratorAdministrator
10K

PostMay 26, 2009#73

Gary Kreie wrote:Clayton is banning smoking in restaurants starting June 26? I hadn't heard this. I'll have to start going to restaurants there. Now we go from Kirkwood out to Buffalo Wild Wings in Balwin, where smoking is banned.


I don't think the ban in Clayton has been passed yet.



Edit: I think it's going to a vote today.

3,429
Life MemberLife Member
3,429

PostMay 26, 2009#74

Wow, the tobacco growing states are passing us on the smoking issue.







Red -- Smoking banned in restaurants only.



Pink -- Smoking banned in restaurants and bars.



Yellow -- Smoking banned in non-hospitality workplaces and restaurants.



White -- Smoking banned in all public places.



Gray -- No Smoking ban at State Level.

10K
AdministratorAdministrator
10K

PostMay 26, 2009#75

Gary Kreie wrote:Wow, the tobacco growing states are passing us on the smoking issue.


Insane. But then again, Missourah has always been content to be backwards.



Our tobacco tax is also significantly lower than most states, including North Carolina.

Read more posts (20 remaining)