A green parking lot? You've gotta be kidding me. The Archiocese is now pulling tricks from the playbook of Jerry Rice?JMedwick wrote:I had not followed this very closely, however I thought the PubDef video was very interesting. The idea of a "green" parking lot makes the proposal marginally better, however even such a parking lot is a far cry from the presence fostered by a building on the site.
Excellent letter to the editor in this week's West End Word:
http://www.westendword.com/NC/0/364.html
The letter was written by someone named John Wimmer. Not sure if he's one of us or not, but he would fit right in around here.
http://www.westendword.com/NC/0/364.html
The letter was written by someone named John Wimmer. Not sure if he's one of us or not, but he would fit right in around here.
He goes by the name John W. on blogs. He's registered here, but has not posted. He's been involved in our group to stop the demo.
- 835
Great letter, John. I encourage others to submit letters too!
- 479
The National trust for Historic Preservation's <i>Preservation Online</i> covered the issue this week -- read it <a href="http://www.preservationnation.org/magaz ... l">here</a>.
Plus today's <i>Vital Voice</i> carries Lindsey Derrington's article <a href="http://www.thevitalvoice.com/cgi-script ... tm">Recoup DeVille Motor Hotel: No Need to Demolish Historic Building</a>.
Plus today's <i>Vital Voice</i> carries Lindsey Derrington's article <a href="http://www.thevitalvoice.com/cgi-script ... tm">Recoup DeVille Motor Hotel: No Need to Demolish Historic Building</a>.
The Missouri Alliance for Historic Preservation has joined the bandwagon. They have added the San Luis to their "Most Endangered" list for 2008 (along with the Mullanphy Emigrant Home).
http://www.stltoday.com/stltoday/news/s ... enDocument
http://www.stltoday.com/stltoday/news/s ... enDocument
Save the San Luis: www.noparkinglotonlindell.com
Flier!
We will be doing flier distribution Saturday after work. PM for more info.
Flier!
We will be doing flier distribution Saturday after work. PM for more info.
B.E.L.T.'s (linked) tour of Lindell's Mid-Century Modern architecture is a must-see for all of you who still don't get the value of saving our Mid Century heritage.
Thanks for your work on this, Doug. Godspeed, young man.
Thanks for your work on this, Doug. Godspeed, young man.
There was an interesting tidbit in the West End Word this week. It seems that Raymond Burke's promotion to the Vatican has put a hold on any demolition of the San Luis. Apparently, any decisions involving local Catholic interests must await the installation of a new archbishop.
Yep, and we are using that to our advantage to be able to make a better case of why a parking lot is completely innapropriate for that space.
- 424
Not related to keeping these standing, but has anyone noticed how the apartment building across Lindell almost mirrors the odd design of these? It's the black and tan apartment building.
Also, San Luis is completely empty right? Why are some lights still on in the complex?
Also, San Luis is completely empty right? Why are some lights still on in the complex?
FloPoErich wrote:has anyone noticed how the apartment building across Lindell almost mirrors the odd design of these?
That's another reason it's so important to save the San Luis - it's part of a unique group of mid-century architecture lining both sides of Lindell.
what is the status on this? the idea that this could even happen is beyond a joke.. who is the alderman?
Lyda Krewson is the alderman (woman), but her hands are pretty much tied. Since the Archdiocese owns the building, no one can tell them what to do or not to do with the property.
There is a growing movement pushing for preservation, and I'm sure others on this forum can tell you how to get involved.
As of now, the building's fate is unknown, awaiting a new Archbishop.
There is a growing movement pushing for preservation, and I'm sure others on this forum can tell you how to get involved.
As of now, the building's fate is unknown, awaiting a new Archbishop.
whats really sad is that i know several developers who have offered to purchase this building to redevelop it. The archdiocese can go f itself as far as i'm concerned if it thinks it can tear this down for a SURFACE LOT ON LINDELL...what a joke. come on St. Louis...

There are many possibilities for this building among which include a hotel or residential. Demolition of this historic building for a parking lot would be an egregious affront to the Central West End National Register Historic District and detriment to the greater Central West End Neighborhood.
This building might be more of an acquired taste, however we shouldn't go around demolishing stable, useful buildings due to architectural bias. If we do this then we're no better than George Hellmuth of HOK who said "The Buder, Title Guaranty, and International Buildings are the three ugliest buildings in town" (Gateway Mall Scrapbook, 65). Real Estate Row was then subsequently demolished and for what!
We shouldn't defer solely to the preferences of personalities or institutions. How much damage have we seen already because we were told a given building was obsolete or that a replacement would maximize economic development? It's a ridiculous notion and we may also look to the Century Building as another fine example of this failed ideology. That decision categorically failed to spur development in the Old Post Office District.
Demolition of the San Luis will erase a fine example of Midcentury Modernism and a connection to our past. A parking lot squanders the economic gains achieved from reuse into a hotel complimented with a cafe/restaurant. If the San Luis were put back into use as hotel it would serve the internationally acclaimed Cathedral Basilica-St. Louis, St. Louis University, and the Central West End as a whole. Located on a Metrobus line, less than a mile from Metrolink light rail, and with easy access to the new Highway 64, the centrally located San Luis would serve local, regional, and international clients.
Thanks to Paul Hohmann for locating the above image.
Framer wrote:There was an interesting tidbit in the West End Word this week. It seems that Raymond Burke's promotion to the Vatican has put a hold on any demolition of the San Luis. Apparently, any decisions involving local Catholic interests must await the installation of a new archbishop.
I have a source at HUD who stated that the interim archbishop can approve the demolition. Apparently he has done just that, and HUD is currently drawing up the documents stating that the Arch Diocese can do with it as they wish. This will effectively release any encombrances on the property restricting its use as affordable housing. I think we may be seeing a wrecking ball soon.
What the hell are we going to do??? We have to get together soon and figure out a plan of action.
- 5,433
LoftLaw wrote:Framer wrote:There was an interesting tidbit in the West End Word this week. It seems that Raymond Burke's promotion to the Vatican has put a hold on any demolition of the San Luis. Apparently, any decisions involving local Catholic interests must await the installation of a new archbishop.
I have a source at HUD who stated that the interim archbishop can approve the demolition. Apparently he has done just that, and HUD is currently drawing up the documents stating that the Arch Diocese can do with it as they wish. This will effectively release any encombrances on the property restricting its use as affordable housing. I think we may be seeing a wrecking ball soon.
That makes me sick, but it's not the least bit surprising. What can we do now?
I've said it before, but I'll say it again:

It might be time to get the band back together.
We banded back together, and are actually in the process of coming up with a plan for the property. We just thought we had more time.
- 549
MattnSTL wrote:We banded back together, and are actually in the process of coming up with a plan for the property. We just thought we had more time.
I wish you luck. Anything everyone else can do? Protests, etc?
UrbanPioneer wrote:
I wish you luck. Anything everyone else can do? Protests, etc?
Probably. We will for sure let everyone here know.







