BTW. Another good idea is kolache factory. If I was opening a franchise downtown that's the one I would open.
Having worked in the Rudmann Bldg for about a year and a half, I agree and don't. Meaning, west of Tucker is really a separate entity. There's a lot of office workers on that stretch. Hoofing it from 13th and Wash to Met Square is impractical during lunch hour (not to mention summer heat and freezing temps)kbshapiro wrote:Not a fan of Park Pacific. Too far west to get the office and tourist traffic and kind of sits there on its own (except maybe the buildings along Tucker like SLU law).
And regarding Park Pacific, I keep having visions of Jeff Arms being rehabbed, and new 7-8 story construction on the USBank lot and across the street, Zimmerman Design. Hopefully SLU and the new bridge will spur this type of development.
other random fast-food thoughts:
Steak and Shake (huge destination, flagship store)
Taco Bell
McDonalds (seriously, there used to be 3 downtown! And now none. Not my favorite place, but really.)
I think a Jimmy Johns west of Tucker on Wash could do well.
- 8,155
I'm not so pessimistic. We are adding meaningful daytime population and prospects seem good for continued growth. The estimate is about 500 new residents annually in recent years (that's 2K more population in 2014 than 2010) and over 1,000 bodies were brought downtown with the SLU Law move. Arch grounds and BPV/Live will bring more activity as well, and convention business is doing significantly better. So although employment numbers have been a struggle, we nevertheless are growing. We're on the cusp.debaliviere wrote:We can daydream about new retailers, but until downtown lands more employers/jobs - lots of them - it's going to be real hard to attract any national chains.
I don't know if it has to be "flagship" since they're not headquartered here. But they do have one in downtown Indianapolis, which is their HQ.shadrach wrote: Steak and Shake (huge destination, flagship store)
^Ahhhh, you caught on! It's all part of my nefarious desires to have S&S relocate their corporate office here.
Is this a true statement? Even if we add residents downtown. How many stay during they day. Dont more than half leave downtown during the day for work? And with AT&T closing up shop are we not still loosing daytime population? Ive lived and worked down here for 11 years and it seems much less active during the days.roger wyoming II wrote:
I'm not so pessimistic. We are adding meaningful daytime population and prospects seem good for continued growth.
Sorry not trying to start something just hopeing my thinking is wrong on this one.
According to the 2010 Census, downtown (census tract 1256) had a 226% gain in population compared to that of 2000.irock7777 wrote:Is this a true statement? Even if we add residents downtown. How many stay during they day. Dont more than half leave downtown during the day for work? And with AT&T closing up shop are we not still loosing daytime population? Ive lived and worked down here for 11 years and it seems much less active during the days.roger wyoming II wrote:
I'm not so pessimistic. We are adding meaningful daytime population and prospects seem good for continued growth.
Sorry not trying to start something just hopeing my thinking is wrong on this one.
http://projects.nytimes.com/census/2010/map
I think the key will be the AT&T vacancy. I think it can go either way. It could clear the way for a major anchor company to refurbish the building and be based there, along one of the most scenic downtowns in the country. Or it might sit empty for a long long time. I hope the powers that be are working endlessly behind the scenes to make sure the latter does not happen.
JuanHamez wrote:
According to the 2010 Census, downtown (census tract 1256) had a 226% gain in population compared to that of 2000.
http://projects.nytimes.com/census/2010/map
I think the key will be the AT&T vacancy. I think it can go either way. It could clear the way for a major anchor company to refurbish the building and be based there, along one of the most scenic downtowns in the country. Or it might sit empty for a long long time. I hope the powers that be are working endlessly behind the scenes to make sure the latter does not happen.
Thanks for that stat. Are there stats on how many of those residents work downtown? Also is there a stat on downtown job losses over the same period? Has there been a year with more new jobs created downtown vs losses?
- 8,155
^ My bet is that the downtown employment is lower now than in 2000..... I was looking at our overall momentum since 2010, where we've had higher hotel and convention bookings, more residents, SLU Law move and probably about the same of jobs (with a few relatively smallish wins and losses) So my point was that we are in better shape now than just a few years ago, and we are poised for continued, significant growth in non-corporate areas.
You are right about AT&T as a concern, but I believe many will still be working downtown at another facility and further I think the likely growth elsewhere will overcome that.
Good question on the residents versus workers.... it would be interesting to know which has a greater economic impact on retail downtown (I suspect residents even if many of them work elsewhere) and what kinds of differing types of retail they support.
You are right about AT&T as a concern, but I believe many will still be working downtown at another facility and further I think the likely growth elsewhere will overcome that.
Good question on the residents versus workers.... it would be interesting to know which has a greater economic impact on retail downtown (I suspect residents even if many of them work elsewhere) and what kinds of differing types of retail they support.
- 10K
I've worked downtown since the late 90s, and it's significantly less active during the day than it used to be. In that time, we've lost May Co., two major accounting firms - Ernst & Young (to the burbs) and Arthur Anderson (Enron scandal), three major law firms - Armstrong Teasdale, Husch & Eppenberger and Blackwell Sanders (due to its merger with Husch), a major HQ - TWA, and we've seen companies like Bank of America, Union Pacific and AT&T significantly reduce their workforces here.irock7777 wrote:Is this a true statement? Even if we add residents downtown. How many stay during they day. Dont more than half leave downtown during the day for work? And with AT&T closing up shop are we not still loosing daytime population? Ive lived and worked down here for 11 years and it seems much less active during the days.roger wyoming II wrote:
I'm not so pessimistic. We are adding meaningful daytime population and prospects seem good for continued growth.
Sorry not trying to start something just hopeing my thinking is wrong on this one.
While there have been some gains, they haven't come close to making up for the losses.
- 8,155
^ no doubt there's less than a decade ago; again my focus has been on the past few years.... do you think things are busier than in 2010? Also, a decade ago there was very limited activity on weekends unless a major event was going on.... that has changed significantly due to the residential growth and adds to the retail potential when businesses can expect 7 day traffic rather than 9-5 M-F.
I'm sorry to say this but no things are not busier since 2010, to me. The reason i created an account was because ive noticed it much quieter, during the day, over the last few years. I wanted to see if it was just me or if others agreed. I was hoping SLU would change that but i didnt notice much increase from that. Things are definitively busier in the evenings. But alot of these business rely on daytime traffic and close after workroger wyoming II wrote:^ no doubt there's less than a decade ago; again my focus has been on the past few years.... do you think things are busier than in 2010? Also, a decade ago there was very limited activity on weekends unless a major event was going on.... that has changed significantly due to the residential growth and adds to the retail potential when businesses can expect 7 day traffic rather than 9-5 M-F.
- 8,155
^ thanks. It really would be nice to get some solid data on job population over past few years.... my assumption/hope is that we reached bottom during the Great Recession and are beginning to slowly recover. Perhaps I'm wrong.
- 5,433
THIS.arch city wrote:Personally, I don't think the city is doing enough to lure retail to downtown. There's no strategy or initiative, it seems. There are certainly enough workers and residents downtown to have more low and middle-end retail than it currently does.
Arch, you're more familiar with Houston than I am. When Houston Pavilions lost businesses and the former Foley's flagship bit the dust just months before the former Famous-Barr flagship closed here, Houston's mayor announced the creation of a task force. Months later, the task force completed its work and recommended a plan.
I must confess I am still reading up on exactly what they are doing in Houston. But that's precisely my point- they're doing something. And the closure of Macy's and the failure of adjacent retail spurred city government into action.
When, if ever, will we see a truly proactive approach to attract and retain retailers in downtown St. Louis?
^I know that St. Louis (and/or) the Partnership for Downtown St. Louis had a downtown retail study some years back. Some consultant out of Philly studied the market and came up with a lot of recommendations.
Downtown gained some retail traction as a result of the study, but that was when Washington Avenue was undergoing its initial renaissance, I believe.
Fast-forward to a different time (2014), a continuous growing downtown residential demographic, slow-growing daytime population, post-Macy's and post-recession era. To me, it seems like it is time for a new downtown retail study. The Partnership for Downtown St. Louis has been awfully quiet lately - at least to me. I know they are helping to push the streetcar, but what about a new retail study?
Retail and dining at MX has been awesome, but it seems as if there is helter-skelter/pockmark retail/dining development downtown and no urgency to retool original plans.
In regards to Houston, its downtown retail study appears to have wrapped up 09/13.
Here's the PDF.
The residential, tourism/hotel/convention and workforce markets for downtown Houston are growing - so I am sure the beefing up of retail downtown will follow.
Downtown gained some retail traction as a result of the study, but that was when Washington Avenue was undergoing its initial renaissance, I believe.
Fast-forward to a different time (2014), a continuous growing downtown residential demographic, slow-growing daytime population, post-Macy's and post-recession era. To me, it seems like it is time for a new downtown retail study. The Partnership for Downtown St. Louis has been awfully quiet lately - at least to me. I know they are helping to push the streetcar, but what about a new retail study?
Retail and dining at MX has been awesome, but it seems as if there is helter-skelter/pockmark retail/dining development downtown and no urgency to retool original plans.
In regards to Houston, its downtown retail study appears to have wrapped up 09/13.
Here's the PDF.
The residential, tourism/hotel/convention and workforce markets for downtown Houston are growing - so I am sure the beefing up of retail downtown will follow.
- 3,235
The Partnership has been quiet because they have been without a CEO. Their new CEO just started this month and has been very active on twitter. I would expect to start hearing more from them.
For those keeping score at home, it's https://twitter.com/DougWoodruffSTLdowntown2007 wrote:The Partnership has been quiet because they have been without a CEO. Their new CEO just started thus month and has been very active on twitter. I would expect to start heRing more from them.
Well, that's good. It's been pretty much crickets over there.downtown2007 wrote:The Partnership has been quiet because they have been without a CEO. Their new CEO just started thus month and has been very active on twitter. I would expect to start heRing more from them.
Glad to hear he's on the post.
Looking forward to ambitious plans and projects.
- 10K
I agree completely. I wish it weren't so, and I hope things improve in the future.irock7777 wrote:I'm sorry to say this but no things are not busier since 2010, to me. The reason i created an account was because ive noticed it much quieter, during the day, over the last few years. I wanted to see if it was just me or if others agreed. I was hoping SLU would change that but i didnt notice much increase from that. Things are definitively busier in the evenings. But alot of these business rely on daytime traffic and close after workroger wyoming II wrote:^ no doubt there's less than a decade ago; again my focus has been on the past few years.... do you think things are busier than in 2010? Also, a decade ago there was very limited activity on weekends unless a major event was going on.... that has changed significantly due to the residential growth and adds to the retail potential when businesses can expect 7 day traffic rather than 9-5 M-F.
- 8,155
^ My last visit downtown was a few weeks ago on a weeknight for Bailey's and my observation was that it was more lively than anything I could have expected a few years ago. I'll have to make it a point to try to make it downtown soon on a weekday and just stroll around various parts for awhile.
- 1,792
I would say arch grants are focused on devloping rapidly scalable businesses based in St. Louis city. A retail store front can't compare in terms of return on investment. I could definitely see there being incentives. The rent idea isn't bad. Maybe tax exemption for a set period or a mini TIF of sorts but handing a new concept restaraunt 50k is probably a bad idea.
- 5,433
Arch, thanks for this as well as the background on the retail task force commissioned by the mayor of Houston.arch city wrote:^I know that St. Louis (and/or) the Partnership for Downtown St. Louis had a downtown retail study some years back. Some consultant out of Philly studied the market and came up with a lot of recommendations.
Downtown gained some retail traction as a result of the study, but that was when Washington Avenue was undergoing its initial renaissance, I believe.
Fast-forward to a different time (2014), a continuous growing downtown residential demographic, slow-growing daytime population, post-Macy's and post-recession era. To me, it seems like it is time for a new downtown retail study. The Partnership for Downtown St. Louis has been awfully quiet lately - at least to me. I know they are helping to push the streetcar, but what about a new retail study?
Retail and dining at MX has been awesome, but it seems as if there is helter-skelter/pockmark retail/dining development downtown and no urgency to retool original plans.
I remember the initial push for retail downtown a decade ago here in St. Louis, and there were some success stories. Some of the businesses from the first wave are still around, although some did not survive. We've lost our indoor mall and our last traditional department store, but we've gained a livelier Washington Avenue streetscape with MX and an excellent albeit small anchor for the Old Post Office area (Culinaria). So there are some positives along with the negatives. But what's next?
One of my concerns and one of the things not addressed by the first plan is how to concentrate retail and restaurants in a city with a decentralized workforce and a relatively large downtown in terms of area. There are fewer workers in the core of downtown, which make the streets feel considerably emptier during the day even with increased activity in the evening as DeBaliviere and others here have noted previously in this discussion. And when the first wave of retailers came back to downtown over the last decade, they were scattered about. Great additions to downtown, no doubt, but it wasn't the most inviting place to shop on a Saturday when one had to walk past some rather desolate and empty blocks to get from one business to the next. And there were still a lot of businesses that simply couldn't justify being open on the weekends, even restaurants. I remember directing some visitors from Macy's to Culinaria not long after the market opened because no other restaurants in the immediate area were open on an early Saturday afternoon.
This concern also leads me to my next question: What area should be the focus for downtown retail? There is some retail along Washington Avenue, but with the exception of Culinaria, it never felt to me like Olive Street, once the east-west axis for retail in downtown, was given all that much consideration by the DTSLP or City Hall. Houston's task force came up with some pretty specific recommendations and a pretty focused plan to boost retail in the core of downtown. Where should our core be? Should it be along Olive Street and/or up Sixth and Seventh streets as it was in the days when Famous-Barr and Stix Baer & Fuller anchored the area, or should it radiate south from Washington Avenue? What about future phases of BPV- how should it relate to the rest of downtown once it's built out? And what can be done to attract retailers to these areas? Never mind the empty Railway Exchange which requires a comprehensive plan of its own. There are some empty, depressing blocks surrounding it as well. And there's still a fair amount of empty space in the MX garage retail space itself. Hopefully new leadership for Downtown St. Louis will help. But it'd be really nice to see City Hall take a more proactive role. It does NOT seem to be a priority for the current mayor, who is likely to be in office until at least 2067.
- 933
I hate to bring this up again, but if and when Missouri jumps on the marijuana legalization bandwagon, it's really going to help bring many of our dead storefront back to life. In Colorado, there are now more dispensaries than there are Starbucks. I could see there being a pretty sizable concentration of these Downtown without cannibalizing each others business. They will also anchor new restaurants because these customers are going to be hungry. I'm sure they will also wanna groove on some crunchy entertainment and shopping in the 'hood as well.
I'm speaking as someone who personally is not a chronically stoned hipster but as someone who wants to see the local economy flourish and who wants non-violent criminals like pot smokers to no longer be a priority for cops, especially in a city like St. Louis where, let's face it, there's just too much violent crime to justify wasting police resources on chasing people with a plant. Tourism from St. Louis to Colorado is up almost 20% already because of what they have done. Let's make it so people are coming to Missouri seeking the freedom to get toasted, too. This would give us an extremely unique, popular, vibrant Downtown. We'll just have a few weird smells to get used to. In short, these big dispensaries would really help anchor other businesses, lure tourists and encourage more development Downtown.
I'm speaking as someone who personally is not a chronically stoned hipster but as someone who wants to see the local economy flourish and who wants non-violent criminals like pot smokers to no longer be a priority for cops, especially in a city like St. Louis where, let's face it, there's just too much violent crime to justify wasting police resources on chasing people with a plant. Tourism from St. Louis to Colorado is up almost 20% already because of what they have done. Let's make it so people are coming to Missouri seeking the freedom to get toasted, too. This would give us an extremely unique, popular, vibrant Downtown. We'll just have a few weird smells to get used to. In short, these big dispensaries would really help anchor other businesses, lure tourists and encourage more development Downtown.
314- the answer to your question IMO for retail (not bars/nightclubs, alcohol centric restaurants) is Olive St from 4th to Tucker (12th). It's the spine of the CBD (similar to I64 to the St Louis region). Culinaria is the starting point. Go east and west from there.
Thoughts:
Finding a 2nd anchor to the CBD by re-leasing the first floor of the former Macy's space needs to be the first priority. Don't know who the tenant(s) needs to be, but I still think its ridiculous that CVS or Walgreens doesn't have a store in the downtown CBD. 12,000 plus permanent population (that's growing), six figure daytime population, tourists, conventions, hotels, sporting events, etc. While I think some of you are insane to think the CBD can support some of the retailers thrown out by some on this forum, this is a category I think is dropping the ball. Off the top of my head, some others: Jos A Bank/Mens Warehouse, a small urban prototype of Office Depot, one of the dollar stores, full service fitness facility, and more (but least important) quick serve restaurants.
I also strongly believe that we have to get rid of the one way system/grid we have downtown. This will make it easier to get around and easier to sell a particular street block to tenants/retailers. Plus, it slows traffic down for better exposure to the storefronts.
Thoughts:
Finding a 2nd anchor to the CBD by re-leasing the first floor of the former Macy's space needs to be the first priority. Don't know who the tenant(s) needs to be, but I still think its ridiculous that CVS or Walgreens doesn't have a store in the downtown CBD. 12,000 plus permanent population (that's growing), six figure daytime population, tourists, conventions, hotels, sporting events, etc. While I think some of you are insane to think the CBD can support some of the retailers thrown out by some on this forum, this is a category I think is dropping the ball. Off the top of my head, some others: Jos A Bank/Mens Warehouse, a small urban prototype of Office Depot, one of the dollar stores, full service fitness facility, and more (but least important) quick serve restaurants.
I also strongly believe that we have to get rid of the one way system/grid we have downtown. This will make it easier to get around and easier to sell a particular street block to tenants/retailers. Plus, it slows traffic down for better exposure to the storefronts.
- 8,155
Hiya, kb! All kidding aside, great post. If the Arcade -- especially with the Webster component -- and Chemical get off the ground that will be a great boost for Olive becoming a retail anchor.kbshapiro wrote:While I think some of you are insane to think the CBD can support some of the retailers thrown out by some on this forum...
With the demographics you cited, I'm reminded of downtown Cleveland, which I believe has similar demos but slightly higher daytime population.... Euclid Ave. has long been the anchor there (and now with BRT) and has had a CVS and a Dunkin Donuts for as long as I can recall. Not sure why that is, but perhaps pedestrian/traffic flow plays a role. Anyway, I think a good location for a CVS or Walgreens would be around Olive and 6th. That central location would seem to serve both residents, workers and even MX/convention/tourism/BPV goers pretty well.






