I can't see it being other then you really like it or hate it from the outside.
For me, I'm with Peter right now. Somehow a couple big sweeping arches trying to mimic the Powell Arches over the street facing windows seems like a big miss IMO (or least that is what I think the intention is). I get the fact that the ornate details of past are tough to pull off without huge sums of money. But I just don't get proportions in my laymen terms of design.
but as Framer noted, devil will be in the details. Also, in fairness we truly have no idea what the additions inside will be for the audience experience and as well for the artist going forward. I think the inside space is very relevant as a whole so I can see where some tradeoffs might be made.
For me, I'm with Peter right now. Somehow a couple big sweeping arches trying to mimic the Powell Arches over the street facing windows seems like a big miss IMO (or least that is what I think the intention is). I get the fact that the ornate details of past are tough to pull off without huge sums of money. But I just don't get proportions in my laymen terms of design.
but as Framer noted, devil will be in the details. Also, in fairness we truly have no idea what the additions inside will be for the audience experience and as well for the artist going forward. I think the inside space is very relevant as a whole so I can see where some tradeoffs might be made.




















