Matt wrote:When I first moved here in 1990 there was a huge nightclub on Oakland Ave. where the Science Center is now. I think it was last named 64 West. It was a really cool place and had a large pop/rock orchestra that sounded great. I suppose coke was the drug of choice then. The place was large, upscale, and expensive. I remember going there for Christmas parties and the place was really beautiful.
Matt wrote:When I first moved here in 1990 there was a huge nightclub on Oakland Ave. where the Science Center is now. I think it was last named 64 West. It was a really cool place and had a large pop/rock orchestra that sounded great. I suppose coke was the drug of choice then. The place was large, upscale, and expensive. I remember going there for Christmas parties and the place was really beautiful.
Rupert's/64 West. It died a predictable death.
That place looked like something out of "Less Than Zero." Unfortunately, it replaced Stan Musial's restaurant, which I have vague memories of.
My memories are vague, too, because all I remember are the name, the location, and the many ads for it that I used to see on the front and sides of Bi-State buses. And the garish look of M&B's successor, 64 West, is really hard to forget!
I used to have a bunch of autographed photos of Stan the Man from his restaurant - it seemed like whenever someone in my family went there, they always brought me back a pic. I have no idea what happened to them all - they're all MIA!
Matt wrote:When I first moved here in 1990 there was a huge nightclub on Oakland Ave. where the Science Center is now. I think it was last named 64 West. It was a really cool place and had a large pop/rock orchestra that sounded great. I suppose coke was the drug of choice then. The place was large, upscale, and expensive. I remember going there for Christmas parties and the place was really beautiful.
It was a snowstorm in Ruperts.
So it sounds like you're old enough to remember the club at the opposite end of the spectrum that started it all on Washington Ave: "1227"? If you went to "1227" people thought you were a freak.
I used to have a bunch of autographed photos of Stan the Man from his restaurant - it seemed like whenever someone in my family went there, they always brought me back a pic. I have no idea what happened to them all - they're all MIA!
I only had one, but I still have it hanging up in my office (right next to my Bravo Bravo El Birdos pennant).
The Central Scrutinizer wrote:Having been in the bar business myself, I got pretty good at being able to pick who was potential trouble and who wasn't. If that's what you call "profiling", then that is what I was doing.
If they don't meet dress code, that's one thing. You can't keep people out based on "potential trouble" or how they look. What if your assessment is wrong? That's biased and asking for a lawsuit.
Yeah, I think as long as one doesn't categorically discriminate against an identifiable group--a specific race, gender, sexual orientation, etc.--I'm pretty sure a business owner can tell whomever he or she wants to leave.
Yes, businesses do have the right to refuse to service anyone, but they better make sure their ducks are in a row when they refuse service to people.
So, if the owners of Plush had that right, why did they not exercise it? Are you suggesting that they wanted their money to go down the tubes? I don't think so. An owner does have the right to tell a patron or customer they have to leave - IF they are causing problems. In fact, Plush owners did just that before the killing outside of the club. Again, owners cannot refuse people entry just because of the way they look - outside of dress code or being dirty or deshelved.
If it is a "private" entity or club that is certainly different.
If a person is a known troublemaker and has caused problems at a club or facility in the past - that is different, but to prohibit entry based on "potential" is a lawsuit waiting to happen.
Yea, Rupert's was the name. I also used to go to 1227.
I went looking for Spruill's today and found what appears to be a total dive. When the Post was talking about nightclubs, I got a much higher image going in my mind.
Hmm. I worked the door at a bar in the West End for a while, and my management made it perfectly clear that I should deny entry to anyone who looked like a panhandler. Is that profiling -- or is it just making sure that your customers aren't going to be hassled?
Believe it or not, when you work the door (or the bar, or even in a department store) for a while, you can begin to pretty easily identify who is a legitimate customer or not. It's not a matter of race, or even of class. But how someone carries him/herself, how they are dressed, etc. People who are looking for trouble usually look like they are looking for trouble.
The news surrounding some of St. Louis' urban nightspots is as bad as it gets.
Suddenly, it seems, African-American-oriented clubs are the new danger zones. The facts are depressingly indisputable.
In the past month or so, a man was fatally shot near Plush, 1820 Market Street, after getting kicked out.
A couple of shootings at Spruill's, 1101 North Jefferson Avenue, left several people wounded.
And a bouncer was killed at the Formula, 1204 Washington Boulevard, shortly before it was set to close.
But it hasn't always been this way for these clubs.
Before there was Café Soul, singer Coco Soul's R&B showcase, Plush was home to the rather upscale-oriented Soul Café, a one-of-a-kind concert series early last year. Soul Café, organized by music promoter Reno, brought in the cream of the crop of neo-soul acts, including Bilal, Rahsaan Patterson, Vivian Green, Lyfe Jennings and Jaguar Wright. The events were peaceful, mature and unfortunately short-lived, as the weekly series wasn't too cost-effective.
The Formula, previously known as Isis, was a reliable, trouble-free spot for urban late-night partying. Nelly, Russell Simmons, Erykah Badu, Dru Hill, Jaheim, Floetry and Boris Kodjoe were among the artists who partied or had special, headline-free events at Isis. The shorter-lived Formula had several great parties as well as a couple of successful 1st Friday events and a Boy George DJ Spin.
Spruill's programming is simpler but still doesn't appear to lend itself to the trouble it's seeing now.
Hopefully, all the new drama won't forever taint that scene.
Not as bad as Washington Street. I don't know why, but the hairs on the back of my neck stick up when I hear someone say that. But maybe that's just an indication I need to relax and get a life.
steve wrote:Not as bad as Washington Street. I don't know why, but the hairs on the back of my neck stick up when I hear someone say that. But maybe that's just an indication I need to relax and get a life.
OMG I absolutely hate when people say that. It immediatly shows that they just have no clue what they are talking about.