1,320
Veteran MemberVeteran Member
1,320

PostFeb 19, 2013#376

I guess my perspective is that the Planning Commission took action that prevented Biondi from demolishing the main building unless he came through with a new Ambulatory Care Center. On that point, I'm glad they did so. They probably saved the building.

They were also lied to on several counts. The Commission members were told:

1) That SLU was being courted to move to Maryville (false);
2) That SLU was planning to build a hospital on the Pevely site (false); and,
3) That construction would start right away (false).

Given Biondi's deliberate attempt to deceive a public body, I'd imagine he'd love for our anger to be directed at them instead of himself.

655
Senior MemberSenior Member
655

PostFeb 20, 2013#377

^Biondi doesn't work for the people of St. Louis, the Planning Commission (theoretically) does. Biondi isn't accountable to us, while our elected officials, and their appointees to public bodies like the Planning Commission, are accountable to us. Letting them know that we noticed their failure of leadership here and are unhappy is more likely to lead to change than getting mad at Biondi.

1,465
Veteran MemberVeteran Member
1,465

PostFeb 20, 2013#378

"Given Biondi's deliberate attempt to deceive a public body, I'd imagine he'd love for our anger to be directed at them instead of himself"

There is no "instead of" here. There is plenty of rage to go around.

Before Ivy Pinkston got to the preservation board meeting, the SLU folks (who I was sitting behind) were heard whispering 'where is she?' "Dont worry, she said she would make it". It became clear when 'she' go there what had been planned. Ms Pinkston very aggressively rallied to give Biondi what he wanted. At one special moment she pointed out the salaries of the Commission's members were paid out of the earnings tax that SLU employees generate. It was disgusting .

Yes I am glad for the condition for a building permit prior to demolition but the point is that the planning commission seems to be representing political bullies like Biondi more than the residents of the city.

1,320
Veteran MemberVeteran Member
1,320

PostFeb 20, 2013#379

Well, if you want to know who voted how, here's the information, IIRC. By law, six city officials form the core of the Planning Commission, together with four (current) "citizen members". The city officials on the Commission are:

Alderman Fred Wessels – voted for demolition
Alderman Terry Kennedy – voted for demolition
Richard Bradley, President of the Board of Public Service – voted for demolition
Ivy Pinkston, representing Comptroller Darlene Green – voted for demolition
Patrick Brown, representing Mayor Francis Slay – voted against demolition
Tom Shepard, representing Board of Aldermen President Lewis Reed – voted for demolition

The four "citizen members" either voted with the majority or abstained, although they seemed the most critical of SLU's plans during the actual meeting.

PostFeb 20, 2013#380

^Mayor Slay, if you want to send me a check, PM me and I'll give you the address...

PostFeb 24, 2013#381

Tim Bryant follows up on the Pevely on the front page of the Business section in today's Post Dispatch:
Alderman Joe Roddy, whose 17th Ward includes the Pevely site, said he believes SLU will eventually redevelop the area as a medical center.

“As far as I’m concerned, a development will happen there at some point,” he said. “It may not happen for a couple of years.”
http://www.stltoday.com/business/local/ ... d9413.html

678
Senior MemberSenior Member
678

PostFeb 24, 2013#382

Was about to post this. So seriously, what would it take for SLU to be more like Wash U in terms of urban investment? Just getting rid of Biondi?

1,465
Veteran MemberVeteran Member
1,465

PostFeb 24, 2013#383

We need to pressure Mr Joe Roddy to get that pile of rubble cleaned up. Doubt he would stand up to SLU but he needs to be reminded of his job.

11K
Life MemberLife Member
11K

PostFeb 24, 2013#384

^ It took three years for Roddy to enforce codes on the Mills property in the CWE. Sure, it's now going to be a Whole Foods and apartments. He'll declare victory, but he let it sit (against city code) as a swamp for three years. Since the hole was filled in, it has sat another two years.

54
New MemberNew Member
54

PostFeb 25, 2013#385

Alex Ihnen wrote:^ It took three years for Roddy to enforce codes on the Mills property in the CWE. Sure, it's now going to be a Whole Foods and apartments. He'll declare victory, but he let it sit (against city code) as a swamp for three years. Since the hole was filled in, it has sat another two years.
So why does Roddy get to decide which lots/developments are above city code enforcement? That's the real question.

3,762
Life MemberLife Member
3,762

PostMay 04, 2013#386

i'm feeling sick to my stomach over Cupples 7 like i did when the Pevely complex was coming down... losing them both might actually kill me. does anybody know if there's been any effort to close up the demo-induced holes in Pevely? Why the f*ck hasn't Slay called for Roddy to enforce building code?

1,218
Expert MemberExpert Member
1,218

PostMay 04, 2013#387

Is there something going on just north of the Capt D's? Seems as though some soil samples and grading is taking place. Does SLU own this property?

11K
Life MemberLife Member
11K

PostMay 05, 2013#388

^ It's owned by SLU...perhaps a new ambulatory care center?

3,548
Life MemberLife Member
3,548

PostMay 05, 2013#389

Funny how SLU has destroyed so much historic and culturally significant architecture, but leaves the Captain D's untouched. :roll:

1,465
Veteran MemberVeteran Member
1,465

PostMay 06, 2013#390

Time to pressure Alderman Roddy to get the Pevely site rubble cleaned up. Has anyone else written to him?

11K
Life MemberLife Member
11K

PostMay 06, 2013#391

Yes - and about the old vending site on FP Ave. This is his MO - same with City Walk (eventually to become Whole Foods), etc. etc. etc. I don't know the specifics in each case, but a prior complaint I made was simply overruled by a letter from Roddy. That case concerned the STL College of Health Careers using an unimproved grass lot for parking. It shouldn't be allowed, but a letter from Roddy is all it took to prevent enforcement.

296
Full MemberFull Member
296

PostMay 06, 2013#392

Yes I have written to him, and all he did was forward my message to public safety. I always find it more effective to just go to the NSO Ron Coleman. Ald. Roddy has been absolutely useless when my neighbors and I try to engage him.

1,465
Veteran MemberVeteran Member
1,465

PostMay 06, 2013#393

I wonder if Lewis Reed would have any influence on this considering he is the president of the board of aldermen.

1,320
Veteran MemberVeteran Member
1,320

PostMay 07, 2013#394

^I wouldn't be optimistic. Reed and Darlene Green (two of the three members of the Board of Estimate & Apporionment) are notorious for forming an alliance--usually to couter the mayor's influence. In the case of the Pevely, both Reid and Green had their representatives on the Planning Commission vote for Pevely demo. In fact, Green's rep was Biondi's main advocate for demolition. I'd be surprised if Reed would do anything other than defend SLU in this case.

215
Junior MemberJunior Member
215

PostJun 04, 2013#395

http://www.stlbeacon.org/?_escaped_frag ... y_part_one

An article from the Beacon titled "Biondi's Legacy: Good with Buildings, Not so Good with People." I guess if you consider large expanses of green space and rubble in the middle of the city "good with buildings," then he was fantastic.

3,311
Life MemberLife Member
3,311

PostJun 05, 2013#396

Alex, I love that you called their piece "onionesque"! Hilarious. The guy was good for surface parking and green lots. An enemy of buildings is how I'd describe him.

PostJun 05, 2013#397

I'd also like to nominate former Mercantile CEO, as the worst person in st louis for leaving us with the "plaza" in front of US Bank (mercantile) Tower where the Ambassador used to stand and the removal of a building for an unattractive fountain in front of college church. Like others have said, this campus could have actually been a true urban campus that connected with its urban environment, but instead it was transformed into a suburban campus with gates and chintzy "art". Just look at the area south of the large parking garage.. On the flip side, there was a TON of crime in this area in the early 80's..Laclede Town anyone..

11K
Life MemberLife Member
11K

PostJun 05, 2013#398

We can't let the myth of demolition = crime reduction take (further) hold in St. Louis. It already taken as truth that barricading streets reduced drug crime. It's simply not true in a systematic sense. A temp closure of a street for a few months, maybe, but what's been done in St. Louis is much different than that. The connection of the built environment to crime doesn't exist. You only have to go back a year to when Biondi stated that the Phillips 66/Del Taco building should go because crime happened there. Buildings don't create crime and that building's renovation has proved it, again.

64
New MemberNew Member
64

PostJun 07, 2013#399

I saw a deer cross Grand Blvd at Chouteau on the walk to work this morning. No joke.

11K
Life MemberLife Member
11K

PostJun 07, 2013#400

Biondi Urban Prairie Preserve.

Read more posts (133 remaining)