2,419
Life MemberLife Member
2,419

PostJun 13, 2023#1351

I think it's pretty insane that the speed between St. Louis and Kansas City is still just 50 mph. 

7,803
Life MemberLife Member
7,803

PostJun 13, 2023#1352

mjbais1489 wrote:
Jun 13, 2023
It's insane that we spent $2B over 20 years and cant make a train go faster than 4 hours and 45 minutes to Chicago.
Lots of people got rich off that.

1,155
Expert MemberExpert Member
1,155

PostJun 13, 2023#1353

Some articles have said "Chicago to St. Louis in under 5 hours". And while the schedules don't show that*, the 307 left Chicago at 7:10 pm yesterday and arrived 15 minutes early in St. Louis at 12:08, just past midnight. So this trip was completed 2 minutes shy of 5 hours.

*EDIT: I thought there were no scheduled trips under 5 hours but there are a few.

13K
Life MemberLife Member
13K

PostJun 13, 2023#1354

There's  padding between Alton and STL.
Maybe planning started 20 years ago and they did a few little things, but making improvement in a substantial way didn't start until after the ARRA grant. 
And the route had atrophied a lot.
Still took way too long for sure.

1,868
Never Logs OffNever Logs Off
1,868

PostJun 13, 2023#1355

dweebe wrote:
Jun 13, 2023
mjbais1489 wrote:
Jun 13, 2023
It's insane that we spent $2B over 20 years and cant make a train go faster than 4 hours and 45 minutes to Chicago.
Lots of people got rich off that.
Like every other aspect of American society, if nobody was getting rich off of it we wouldn't have done it in the first place.

2,327
Life MemberLife Member
2,327

PostJun 13, 2023#1356

For a 5 1/2 hour trip, 3 1/2 are spent getting from downtown to Alton, Joliet to Union Station, I'm kidding but not.

7,803
Life MemberLife Member
7,803

PostJun 13, 2023#1357

shadrach wrote:
Jun 13, 2023
For a 5 1/2 hour trip, 3 1/2 are spent getting from downtown to Alton, Joliet to Union Station, I'm kidding but not.
How many years and billions of dollars would it be to improve those out?

sc4mayor
sc4mayor

PostJun 14, 2023#1358

^ As it’s been mentioned multiple times in this thread…there are plans to move Lincoln Service and Texas Eagle trains to Metra’s Rock Island District between Joliet and Chicago.  Moving passenger trains off the regularly congested and delay prone CN Heritage Line (what current trains use) would shave even more time off.  To accomplish that, the station in Joliet needs to be reconfigured.

Things are moving forward:
addxb2 wrote:
May 03, 2023
That being said, improvements in [the] Chicago area have already been identified and are partially funded or under construction.

CREATE Program Status: https://createprogram.wpenginepowered.c ... us_map.pdf

Union Station Redevelopment: https://www.railwayage.com/passenger/ne ... s-project/

13K
Life MemberLife Member
13K

PostJun 14, 2023#1359

New timetables STL - CHI

4:30a - 9:25 (4 hr 55 min) 300 Lincoln Service
6:35a - 11:40 (5 hr 5 min) 302 Lincoln Service
8:08a - 1:42 (5 hr 34 min) 22 Texas Eagle
2:55p - 8:00 (5 hr 5 min) 318 Missouri RR- Lincoln Service
5:40p - 11:05 (5 hr 25 min) 306 Lincoln Service

The 306 hasn't changed. I hope that's just not been updated yet.

CHI-STL
7:15aa - 12:01 (4 hr 46 min) 301 Lincoln Service
9:50a - 2:51 (5 hr 1 min) 319 Missouri RR- Lincoln Service
1:55p - 7:11 (5 hr 16 min) 22 Texas Eagle
5:20p - 10:23 (5 hr 3 min) 305 Lincoln Service
7:10p - 12:09 (4 hr 59 min) 307 Lincoln Service

7,803
Life MemberLife Member
7,803

PostJun 14, 2023#1360

sc4mayor wrote:
Jun 14, 2023
^ As it’s been mentioned multiple times in this thread…there are plans to move Lincoln Service and Texas Eagle trains to Metra’s Rock Island District between Joliet and Chicago.  Moving passenger trains off the regularly congested and delay prone CN Heritage Line (what current trains use) would shave even more time off.  To accomplish that, the station in Joliet needs to be reconfigured.

Things are moving forward:
addxb2 wrote:
May 03, 2023
That being said, improvements in [the] Chicago area have already been identified and are partially funded or under construction.

CREATE Program Status: https://createprogram.wpenginepowered.c ... us_map.pdf

Union Station Redevelopment: https://www.railwayage.com/passenger/ne ... s-project/
Any idea on how much that will help?

And I assume Alton to St. Louis is a monster headache?

1,097
Expert MemberExpert Member
1,097

PostJun 14, 2023#1361

God I can't believe they moved that 6:40am departure even earlier. Having 3/5 trains from STL to Chicago leave before 9:00am is so brutal. 

525
Senior MemberSenior Member
525

PostJun 14, 2023#1362

PeterXCV wrote:
Jun 14, 2023
God I can't believe they moved that 6:40am departure even earlier. Having 3/5 trains from STL to Chicago leave before 9:00am is so brutal. 
So much this, more trains don't do much if they're not at reasonable times, need a late morning or noon departure

sc4mayor
sc4mayor

PostJun 14, 2023#1363

dweebe wrote:
Jun 14, 2023
sc4mayor wrote:
Jun 14, 2023
^ As it’s been mentioned multiple times in this thread…there are plans to move Lincoln Service and Texas Eagle trains to Metra’s Rock Island District between Joliet and Chicago.  Moving passenger trains off the regularly congested and delay prone CN Heritage Line (what current trains use) would shave even more time off.  To accomplish that, the station in Joliet needs to be reconfigured.

Things are moving forward:
addxb2 wrote:
May 03, 2023
That being said, improvements in [the] Chicago area have already been identified and are partially funded or under construction.

CREATE Program Status: https://createprogram.wpenginepowered.c ... us_map.pdf

Union Station Redevelopment: https://www.railwayage.com/passenger/ne ... s-project/
Any idea on how much that will help?

And I assume Alton to St. Louis is a monster headache?
Addxb2 could probably answer that better than me. In my non expert opinion I’d imagine they could shave another 10-20 or so minutes off moving to a commuter rail corridor instead of a shared freight corridor. I’ve never been to Chicago by train so I’m not really sure how frequent/long delays on that part of the route are.

On the St. Louis side improvements are also being made. The rebuilt Merchants Bridge should help reduce delays, as should the removal of the Broadway truss which allows for wider and faster trains to come across the MacArthur.

TRRA is expanding Madison Yard to allow for longer trains and faster movement and the Lenox tower and interlocking reconstruction increased speeds on that section from 40mph to 80mph for passenger trains and 10-30mph to 40-60mph for freight.

I’m not sure if there is anything else on the docket for this end of the line.

2,675
Life MemberLife Member
2,675

PostJun 14, 2023#1364

The Alton to St. Louis Lenux Tower improvements were completed in October of last year. Allows for trains to run 80mph on certain sections.

Just checked. Train was on-time pulling into Alton but is now estimated to be 12 minutes early pulling into St. Louis. If it holds, travel time between Chicago and St. Louis will be 4:54 minutes.





Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

13K
Life MemberLife Member
13K

PostJun 14, 2023#1365

16 mins early, Huzzah!

PostJun 18, 2023#1366

quincunx wrote:
Jun 14, 2023
New timetables STL - CHI

4:30a - 9:25 (4 hr 55 min) 300 Lincoln Service
6:35a - 11:40 (5 hr 5 min) 302 Lincoln Service
8:08a - 1:42 (5 hr 34 min) 22 Texas Eagle
2:55p - 8:00 (5 hr 5 min) 318 Missouri RR- Lincoln Service
5:40p - 11:05 (5 hr 25 min) 306 Lincoln Service

The 306 hasn't changed. I hope that's just not been updated yet.

CHI-STL
7:15aa - 12:01 (4 hr 46 min) 301 Lincoln Service
9:50a - 2:51 (5 hr 1 min) 319 Missouri RR- Lincoln Service
1:55p - 7:11 (5 hr 16 min) 22 Texas Eagle
5:20p - 10:23 (5 hr 3 min) 305 Lincoln Service
7:10p - 12:09 (4 hr 59 min) 307 Lincoln Service
Indeed the 306 was updated.
5:40p - 10:43 (5 hr 3 min) 306 Lincoln Service

PostJun 18, 2023#1367

The 305 arrived in Carlinville 14 mins early tonight. The new schedule only reduces SPI-CRV by 1 min, 42 to 41. I think there's some more to trim.

7,803
Life MemberLife Member
7,803

PostJun 18, 2023#1368

Under 5 hours is fine.

I want sub-4 hours.

6,118
Life MemberLife Member
6,118

PostJun 18, 2023#1369

Honestly, there's no reason we couldn't have two hundred mile an hour service on that corridor. If the US were a first world country then it'd be two hours flat by rain to Chicago. The density is there. The demand is clearly there. (Given the frequency of flights.) It's flat and fairly rural. It just requires the political will to invest the money. It's a much easier build than California's project. Illinois could make it happen. Missouri really should join in and extend it to Kansas City where, again, the density and demand are clearly there. It needs to be a new rail corridor. It will cost billions. And the airlines are well aware that such a move will cut into their profits, especially if it spreads, and they will continue to lobby against it. (Amtrak and Southwest teamed up to defeat Texas highspeed rail in the 90s. Mostly Southwest, but if I recall correctly Amtrak jumped in as well since it was a private company and it technically cut into their legally protected monopoly.) The asphalt and concrete companies will lobby against it. It'll have more than its fair share of enemies. Even the Musk Ox will doubtless put a few bills into keeping it down. But it needs to happen anyway. It's time to rejoin the first world.

13K
Life MemberLife Member
13K

PostJun 21, 2023#1370

Tonight the 305 was
5 mins late leaving Joliet
1 min early at Dwight
3 mins early at Pontiac
9 mins early at Bloomington-Normal
3 mins early at Lincoln
8 mins early at Springfield
14 mins early at Carlinville
13 mins early at Alton
20 mins early at St. Louis

That's 76 mins faster than schedule. Nice!

3,961
Life MemberLife Member
3,961

PostJun 21, 2023#1371

quincunx wrote:
Jun 21, 2023
Tonight the 305 was
5 mins late leaving Joliet
1 min early at Dwight
3 mins early at Pontiac
9 mins early at Bloomington-Normal
3 mins early at Lincoln
8 mins early at Springfield
14 mins early at Carlinville
13 mins early at Alton
20 mins early at St. Louis

That's 76 mins faster than schedule. Nice!
When it’s early at a station does it have to wait then to leave? Or you are just SOL if you get there on time?

991
Super MemberSuper Member
991

PostJun 21, 2023#1372

Yes, it waited until the scheduled departure times before it left. Eventually they'll update the departure schedule, but my bet is they want to get a larger sample size of actual times before they immediately change departure times.

13K
Life MemberLife Member
13K

PostJun 21, 2023#1373

They're updating the schedule on Monday. Check out post 1367 above.

692
Senior MemberSenior Member
692

PostJun 21, 2023#1374

On the northbound trains, Summit is denoted with a "Stops only to discharge passengers (may leave before time shown)"
https://www.railpassengers.org/resource ... imetables/

You'd think they could do that for Alton on the southbound trains and also Joliet northbound.

Can't be too many people riding Alton-STL or Joliet-CHI, and they can adjust to the possibility of a slightly early departure since the train doesn't really exist to serve those trips.

1,097
Expert MemberExpert Member
1,097

PostJun 21, 2023#1375

^I generally agree though with two caveats that 1) Summit has METRA commuter rail service to Chicago, unlike Alton 
2) There probably are some passengers who board in Alton to connect in St. Louis for Kansas City, though that would be just once a day (with the 319 already running through without connection)

Read more posts (252 remaining)