5,433
Super ModeratorSuper Moderator
5,433

PostFeb 17, 2009#406

Dredger wrote:I'm actually fearful of the comment that HUD is the only game in town.


Going back to Kevin McGowan's comments about his aforementioned project in Springfield, that's the impression I get. :shock:



He says he literally searched the world for financing before coming to that conclusion. It's scary that HUD may actually be the only option for developers to move forward with some of these projects in times like these.

8,922
Life MemberLife Member
8,922

PostFeb 17, 2009#407

so what types of restrictions are on a HUD loan vs more traditional financing options?

11K
Life MemberLife Member
11K

PostFeb 17, 2009#408

^ Agreed. I think it may not be a bad thing for some of these projects to simply be mothballed for better times instead of proceeding now. Those with demolition complete and stabilization work done will be very attractive (and hopefully fast moving) projects once financing options improve.

5,720
Life MemberLife Member
5,720

PostFeb 17, 2009#409

I would think that this project would be a good one for HUD to step in on based on what has been accomplished to date as well as the use of tax credits. It even has an office tenant ready to lease space. I would also hope that HUD could expediate their process in lieu of the lending/credit crisis. I think one of the comments concerning HUD loans was the time period to process, accept and close out a loan.



Other projects, like Ballpark Lofts with a very strong sales record, also seem like a good candidate for HUD. Throw in the Laural and you truly got some great downtown projects that HUD can help make happen.

8,922
Life MemberLife Member
8,922

PostApr 10, 2009#410

LarsonAllen LLP, the 11th largest accounting firm in the area with 45 local CPAs, announced plans a year ago to move from Town & Country to Lawrence Group’s Park Pacific development. However, Lawrence Group has not yet secured financing for its $120 million plan to redevelop the former Union Pacific Railroad headquarters building at 13th and Olive streets into apartments and office space.



LarsonAllen Principal Scott Engelbrecht said he still plans to move the firm downtown in June 2010. “Right now we’re somewhat up in the air because Park Pacific hasn’t gotten their financing secured,” Engelbrecht said. “We’re going downtown. Downtown continues to be the primary epicenter for the community. It’s more central to all of our clients, and from a hiring perspective, we think it will help us because it will open us up to the Illinois employee market.”




http://stlouis.bizjournals.com/stlouis/ ... tory7.html

6,662
AdministratorAdministrator
6,662

PostApr 11, 2009#411

Good to know they plan to move downtown no matter what the status of the Park Pacific may be.

604
Senior MemberSenior Member
604

PostMay 06, 2009#412

Anyone have any updates about the construction loan for this place? It's been idle for over a month now.

8,922
Life MemberLife Member
8,922

PostNov 20, 2009#413

funding in place!



Park Pacific gets $56 million HUD loan

St. Louis Business Journal - by Lisa R. Brown



The Lawrence Group’s stalled redevelopment of the Park Pacific building downtown failed to get traction as a condo development but now has financing in place for a $109 million conversion to apartments, offices and retail space.

http://stlouis.bizjournals.com/stlouis/ ... tory6.html

604
Senior MemberSenior Member
604

PostNov 20, 2009#414

Moorlander wrote:funding in place!



Park Pacific gets $56 million HUD loan

St. Louis Business Journal - by Lisa R. Brown



The Lawrence Group’s stalled redevelopment of the Park Pacific building downtown failed to get traction as a condo development but now has financing in place for a $109 million conversion to apartments, offices and retail space.

http://stlouis.bizjournals.com/stlouis/ ... tory6.html


For us without paying accounts, does it provide any details as of a timeline for construction to restart and what the Tucker side of the development will look like?

142
Junior MemberJunior Member
142

PostNov 20, 2009#415

metzgda wrote:For us without paying accounts, does it provide any details as of a timeline for construction to restart and what the Tucker side of the development will look like?


Lawrence Group CEO Steve Smith said in the article that he plans on closing on financing in January, starting construction in February, and completing the project by Summer 2011. Bids will go out to five pre-qualified contractors the first week of December.

5,720
Life MemberLife Member
5,720

PostNov 20, 2009#416

Dowtown could have a great 2010 with this project, Laural and One Center, and maybe just maybe Ballpark Village as well as the host of smaller relocations and consolidations such as 360. It will be nice to see the regions construction market centered downtown for a change.

1,000
Expert MemberExpert Member
1,000

PostNov 20, 2009#417

http://www.stltoday.com/blogzone/buildi ... to-resume/



Work is set to resume on the Park Pacific project downtown now that the developer, Lawrence Group, has gotten a commitment on a $56 million federally insured loan from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.



Lawrence Group says HUD approved the financing on Wednesday to renovate the 23-story Art Deco building at 1226 Olive for mixed-use residential and commercial space. Clayton-based Gershman Mortgage is Lawrence Group’s lender on the HUD insured loan. Other financial partners include Chevron and Great Southern Bank.



The project will go out to bid the first week of December to a set of contractors including BSI Constructors, Brinkmann Constructors, HBD Construction, Paric Corp. and S.M. Wilson & Company.



Park Pacific will convert the former Union Pacific Railroad headquarters into a mixed-use complex. The 500,000 square foot historic building will have 230 rental apartments with 31,000 square feet of ground floor retail and 47,000 square feet of office space.

2,845
Life MemberLife Member
2,845

PostNov 21, 2009#418


5,433
Super ModeratorSuper Moderator
5,433

PostJan 20, 2010#419

This project was mentioned in a Post-Dispatch article, so it looks like things are still on course for construction to begin soon.

Still, I cannot help but wonder what the elevation facing Tucker Boulevard is going to look like. I realize the Cityside portion of the project was scrapped, but the article states that a parking garage will be constructed east of the current building. Does anyone know whether that garage will be built all the way to Tucker Boulevard, or will part of the lot be preserved for Cityside (or something on a similar scale) to be built at Tucker Boulevard at some point in the future?

With the glut of garages downtown, plus the conversion of St. Louis Centre into what will become a megagarage, I hate to think of another blank wall facing one of downtown's most important streets. The garage across from City Hall is bad enough- Tucker doesn't need another eyesore like that.

8,922
Life MemberLife Member
8,922

PostJan 22, 2010#420

this should help it move forward

• The Lawrence Group’s more than $100 million Park Pacific overhaul of the vacant Missouri Pacific building at 210 N. 13th Street was recommended for a $9 million allocation. The project, led by Lawrence Group CEO Steve Smith, has been on hold for several years but got a boost at the end of 2009 when it was approved for a $56.5 million HUD-insured loan. The 450,000-square-foot art deco building was the former headquarters of Union Pacific Railroad until 2005.

http://stlouis.bizjournals.com/stlouis/ ... ory2.html#

PostJan 28, 2010#421

OT: Can someone enlighten me as to circumstances behind why Union Pacific left St. Louis?

10K
AdministratorAdministrator
10K

PostJan 28, 2010#422

Moorlander wrote:OT: Can someone enlighten me as to circumstances behind why Union Pacific left St. Louis?
Their HQ is in Omaha, and I believe they moved all of the St. Louis workers there when their HQ tower in downtown Omaha was built, around 2000-2001 or so.

That was 1,000 jobs lost. IT jobs, IIRC.

8,922
Life MemberLife Member
8,922

PostJan 28, 2010#423

Thanks, I thought their HQ was here.

10K
AdministratorAdministrator
10K

PostJan 28, 2010#424

Moorlander wrote:Thanks, I thought their HQ was here.
Yeah, the Missouri Pacific Railroad was based here, and it was acquired by Union Pacific, based in Omaha.

8,922
Life MemberLife Member
8,922

PostJan 28, 2010#425

got it, Building Blocks thread says this likely to move forward this year. I am interested to see the renderings for the Tucker side of things.

1,585
Totally AddictedTotally Addicted
1,585

PostJan 29, 2010#426

Moorlander wrote: I am interested to see the renderings for the Tucker side of things.
Me too, but I'm not very optimistic about it. I think they could very easily use the economy as an excuse to just building an ordinary garage.

2,434
Life MemberLife Member
2,434

PostFeb 01, 2010#427

I have heard through the grapevine that the new construction portion facing Tucker has been scrapped.

5,433
Super ModeratorSuper Moderator
5,433

PostFeb 02, 2010#428

STLgasm wrote:I have heard through the grapevine that the new construction portion facing Tucker has been scrapped.
Not surprising. I just hope the garage component hasn't grown at the expense of Cityside, the new development that was supposed to face Tucker Boulevard. I will be so pissed if the garage faces Tucker instead. :twisted:

10K
AdministratorAdministrator
10K

PostFeb 11, 2010#429

Park Pacific work to start this spring
By Tim Logan
St. Louis Post-Dispatch

A deadline has been set to resume work on a major rehab project in downtown St. Louis. June 30.

According a bill that will be filed Friday with the St. Louis Board of Aldermen, the Lawrence Group has agreed to get back to work on the $120 million project by mid-year, and finish it before the end of 2011 (though the bill includes a clause could push the completion date out to Dec. 2012 if circumstances require).
Link

5,433
Super ModeratorSuper Moderator
5,433

PostFeb 16, 2010#430

That sounds like another "definitely maybe". And that's probably the best we can hope for in this lending environment, I suppose. 8)

Read more posts (234 remaining)