12K
Life MemberLife Member
12K

PostNov 22, 2008#176

Nice to see the added density, but that design sure is, uh, disappointing.

2,426
Life MemberLife Member
2,426

PostNov 22, 2008#177

Hopefully the sign will add some pizazz.

7,808
Life MemberLife Member
7,808

PostNov 22, 2008#178

Framer wrote:Nice to see the added density, but that design sure is, uh, disappointing.


I agree. Looks like a college dorm.

10K
AdministratorAdministrator
10K

PostNov 24, 2008#179

captainjackass wrote:Where is this hospital?


:lol:

667
Senior MemberSenior Member
667

PostNov 25, 2008#180

DeBaliviere wrote:
captainjackass wrote:Where is this hospital?


:lol:


lol, I said that about the designs for new buildings being built on the Edward Jones campuses. This design could've been better, but its better than nothing being built at all. I can't wait for it to open.

13K
Life MemberLife Member
13K

PostFeb 13, 2009#181


2,772
Life MemberLife Member
2,772

PostFeb 13, 2009#182

quincunx wrote:The sign was installed today.



http://www.ksdk.com/news/local/story.as ... yid=167299


Looks good. I knew Mr. Edwards wouldn't let us down.

11K
Life MemberLife Member
11K

PostFeb 13, 2009#183

Can't Joe pay someone to take pictures for him?!



Count this as another great project for St. Louis. It's not perfect, but it is great for the Loop and the city.

1,099
Expert MemberExpert Member
1,099

PostFeb 13, 2009#184

Grover wrote:Can't Joe pay someone to take pictures for him?!
If you don't like 'em, then check out the pictures on the Moonrise Hotel's website.



http://www.moonrisehotel.com/

320
Full MemberFull Member
320

PostFeb 14, 2009#185

Friday night,



http://www.glassfantastic.com/pics/extr ... onrise.jpg



(The Img insert function is not working.)

4,553
Life MemberLife Member
4,553

PostMar 27, 2009#186

According to the website the Moonrise Hotel will "lift-off" on April 17th, just 3 short weeks away!



Very exciting. Yet another major investment in the Loop courtesy of Joe Edwards. I can't wait to get to the roof-top bar.



How's it looking? Any pics would be greatly appreciated.

12K
Life MemberLife Member
12K

PostMar 28, 2009#187

^The new hotel is quite ugly, I'm afraid (at least on the outside). Esthetics aside, it should be a great addition to the East Loop.

258
Full MemberFull Member
258

PostMar 29, 2009#188

I disagree, I think it is quite nice looking.

139
Junior MemberJunior Member
139

PostMar 29, 2009#189

Framer Wrote: The new hotel is quite ugly, I'm afraid (at least on the outside). Esthetics aside, it should be a great addition to the East Loop.


I totally agree. The rebuilding of the original structure on the front of the hotel is nice looking. However, the high rise portion is terrible. The materials used along with its' design looks extremely cheap. The tower looks like it belongs off of interstate 70 near the airport. This structure could have benefitted from a brick front and better designed window openings.

11K
Life MemberLife Member
11K

PostMar 29, 2009#190

^^ Yep - I think it's nice. I would have liked to see it align with the sidewalk, but oh well.

13K
Life MemberLife Member
13K

PostApr 01, 2009#191

The Moon went up today.



RFT

Fox2

2,820
Life MemberLife Member
2,820

PostApr 02, 2009#192

very cool!

3,544
Life MemberLife Member
3,544

PostApr 02, 2009#193

For everyone who is criticizing the aesthetics of this hotel......get over it! This is a very cool edition to the Loop and I'm sure we will all love it in time.



Looks like a very attractive building to me!




11K
Life MemberLife Member
11K

PostApr 02, 2009#194

^ JOE! You can borrow my camera anytime, just PM me. Hate to see you get photos with purple fringing that you can't print larger than 8x10! :lol:

12K
Life MemberLife Member
12K

PostApr 02, 2009#195

The sign and the moon are cool, but the hotel looks like a hospital. The Loop is thriving; I think it's time we start demanding higher standards.

1,517
Totally AddictedTotally Addicted
1,517

PostApr 02, 2009#196

The rear and side facades are bland.



I like the front facade, though. Overall, much better than the rendering, which is rare to say!

923
Super MemberSuper Member
923

PostApr 02, 2009#197

Matt Drops The H wrote:The rear and side facades are bland.



I like the front facade, though. Overall, much better than the rendering, which is rare to say!


Agreed on the facades.



What's with the sign though? it's 2009! Can't anyone think about futuristic designs?

10K
AdministratorAdministrator
10K

PostApr 02, 2009#198

Thanks for the photo, Goat. This looks way better than I expected - a pleasant surprise.

4,489
Super ModeratorSuper Moderator
4,489

PostApr 02, 2009#199

I like it. I think it fits in well with the surroundings. It's a great mixture of contemporary, historic, and it is not gaudy.

12K
Life MemberLife Member
12K

PostApr 03, 2009#200

Here's what bugs me about it:



This was the largest structure to be built in the Loop in decades. As such, it was a unique opportunity to build a true landmark; a worthy counter-point to the UC City Hall at the opposite end of the Loop. Instead, we got a generic econobox completely lacking any sense of style, drama, or design.



I'm tired of seeing St. Louis settle for "good enough". Can't somebody around here step up to the plate and reach for the fences?

Read more posts (28 remaining)