I don't think it would be any more expensive than what's done ineffectively now for $11M per year. Given the security budget and what Metro is ostensibly paying for now to the three police agencies, a quick calculation suggests that having about 40-50 officers on the Metro system at any given time is easily achievable.. And that's without spending additional money.DogtownBnR wrote:Not sure if this has been mentioned before, but the ONLY solution to me, is off-duty "REAL" armed police officers on EVERY train and EVERY station. (Even if that means this policy is only enacted after a certain time in the evening)
Once this policy is known, the thugs will stay away, for the most part. I know this will be expensive, but the future of the system is at stake. If riders do not feel safe, you will lose those people that have the means to buy a car or find alternatives. That has to make a good % of the ridership. Obviously, there are people that need to ride Metrolink, but based upon the full parking lots, a good amount of people could drive to work.
Now one has to keep in mind that the system includes buses, too, but clearly the train is where the forces need to be concentrated.





