Tapatalk

Lawless Homes Townhouse Plan Moving Forward

Lawless Homes Townhouse Plan Moving Forward

10K
AdministratorAdministrator
10K

PostDec 15, 2004#1

Still no renderings though...



Housing panel OKs plan to turn nursery into condos, townhouses

By Theresa Tighe

Of the Post-Dispatch

12/13/2004



Aldermanic panel OKs

development plan





Plans to build townhouses and condominiums at the former St. Louis Public School Nursery were approved last week by the St. Louis Board of Aldermen's Housing and Urban Development Committee.



The $25 million proposal now goes to the full board for consideration.



Lawless Homes wants to build a gated community of 11 townhouses and 96 condominiums on the 11-acre site in the Boulevard Heights neighborhood just north of the River Des Peres and south of Carondelet Park. The homes would range in price from $170,000 to $300,000.



Alderman Fred Heitert, R-12th Ward, introduced the proposal. He said the development will turn an eyesore of Quonset huts and overgrown bushes and grass into a "tremendous" project.



Heitert said the developer, and not the city, will provide street maintenance, trash collection and street lights. He also said that no tax abatements or other incentives were involved in the project and that none of the townhouses or condominiums will be rental units.



The schools once used the site to grow plants and trees.



Some neighbors had supported the project, while others had said they would rather have single-family homes built on the site. No one spoke against the proposal at the committee meeting last week.



Mike Lawless, president of Lawless Homes, said some of the site's familiar features would be saved, including a sunken garden, a greenhouse designed for floral display and the powerhouse.



The proposal will come before the Board of Aldermen for a final vote at 10 a.m. Friday at City Hall.

156
Junior MemberJunior Member
156

PostDec 16, 2004#2

Is this the greenhouse site? Also, 'gated community' is code for 'we dont like your type'. They dont add anything to a neighborhood.

10K
AdministratorAdministrator
10K

PostDec 16, 2004#3

Yep, it is the greenhouse site.



I don't like the idea of a gated community either.



Here's another article on the development. For some reason, the alderman's comments that this development is giving south side home buyers "a different option" worries me - makes it sound like the project will be very suburban. Anywho...



Aldermen expected to OK Cascades development

Jim Merkel

Of the Suburban Journals



The Board of Aldermen may take final action Friday on a planned $25 million residential development in the Boulevard Heights neighborhood.



Alderman Fred Heitert, R-12th Ward, said he planned to seek preliminary and final passage of a zoning bill for the 107-unit development at Friday's meeting. Taking both actions in the same meeting would require suspension of the board's rules. The meeting is the last planned for this year.



The developer, Lawless Homes, wants to start grading after the first of the year, Heitert said. The Board of Aldermen's Housing Urban Development and Zoning (HUDZ) Committee last week unanimously voted to recommend passage of the zoning legislation, following a hearing in which nobody spoke in opposition.



The area of the development, which is bounded by Blow Street, Robert Avenue, Field Avenue and Coronado Avenue, is now zoned single family.



"It was a first and as far as I can think the only large scale residential development that is being done without any kind of tax subsidy, any kind of tax abatement," said Alderman Fred Wessels, D-13th Ward, HUDZ Committee chairman.



The Planned Unit Development District established by Heitert's bill gives much more control over the multifamily development, Heitert said.



The city has control over the type of construction that goes into the project, Heitert said.



Heitert's legislation requires the developer to submit a detailed development plan to the city planning commission.



The proposed gated development would be on 11 acres formerly used by the St. Louis Public Schools as a greenhouse and tree nursery. The developer would build 12 eight-unit buildings containing condominiums and 11 attached townhouses.



The average size of the condominiums is to be about 1,220 square feet, according to Heitert's bill. The townhouses will have an average size of about 2,000 square feet.



The smallest condominium is to be a one-bedroom unit of about 905 square feet, not including garages, patios or balconies. The largest condominium unit is to be about 1,522 square feet with three bedrooms and two baths, not including garages, patios or balconies.



The base sales prices are expected to be $170,000 to $200,000 for the condominiums and the base prices of the townhouses will be $200,000 to $230,000.



Two historic structures, commonly called the Power House and the Palm House, will remain and a garden area of cascading pools will be retained as a landscape feature.



The development will maintain all landscaping and will provide the public opportunities for access to the open space within the development.



The aldermanic housing committee was impressed with the development, Heitert said.



"They were amazed that there was any kind of land like that available," Heitert said.



"This was, I felt, an important step forward in giving people on the South Side, residential home buyers, a different option," Wessels said.



"I think it's important that the city offer a variety of residential properties," Wessels said. "This is a niche that is currently unmet."

1,282
AdministratorAdministrator
1,282

PostJan 04, 2006#4

Financial woes bring Cascades project to halt

Jim Merkel

Of the Suburban Journals

South City Journal

01/04/2006



Members of the Boulevard Heights Improvement Association reacted with enthusiasm late in 2004 when a developer showed them plans for a $25-million luxury condominium and townhouse development.



Now, 16 months later, the 11-acre site of the Cascades development remains virtually untouched. Questions remain about when or even if financially strapped Lawless Homes will develop the property.



Michael Lawless, president of Lawless Homes, planned to develop 107 homes on a site formerly used by the St. Louis Public Schools as a greenhouse and tree nursery. The area the 96 condominiums and 11 townhouses would go on is surrounded by Blow Street, Robert Avenue, Field Avenue and Coronado Avenue.



Lawless told members of the Boulevard Heights Improvement Association in September 2004 that he wanted to begin grading by January 2005.



Read more

6,662
AdministratorAdministrator
6,662

PostJan 04, 2006#5

I'll buy it from them for $13,000 (What I currently have). If they don't go for that, maybe the forum could do this as a project together, forming urban St. Louis Development. Then we can develop it properly.

1,282
AdministratorAdministrator
1,282

PostMar 08, 2006#6

Parking is key for 117-home development

Jim Merkel

Of the Suburban Journals

Southwest City Journal

03/08/2006



Prospects for a $35 million 117-home subdivision on 11 acres south of Carondelet Park may hinge on where to park cars.



The prospective developers want to have separate covered parking for the two 24-unit condominium buildings included in the project. They say putting the parking in the basements of the buildings would price the condominiums out of the market.



But Alderman Fred Heitert, R-12th Ward, the St. Louis Planning Commission and some neighbors are pressing the developers to include the parking in the basement.



"I think you're selling the people short. People will pay for that," Ed Reavis, a resident of the area, told the developers at a meeting of the Boulevard Heights Improvement Association March 1. "We can have quality condominiums with underground parking."

But Gregory B. Vatterott, president of Charles E. Vatterott Construction Co., one of the three developers involved in the project, said surveys show that the best price for the condominiums is $160,000. Underground parking would add $15,000 to $18,000 to the price, he said.



"That's outside the sweet spot of what we're trying to accomplish," Vatterott said.



Vatterott, Rolwes Homes, Inc. and Greater Missouri Builders want to develop a mix of 117 homes, including 40 single-family detached homes, 29 attached townhouses and 48 condominiums on the tract in the Boulevard Heights Neighborhood.





Read More

5,433
Super ModeratorSuper Moderator
5,433

PostMar 08, 2006#7

Citylover wrote:Vatterott, Rolwes Homes, Inc. and Greater Missouri Builders want to develop a mix of 117 homes, including 40 single-family detached homes, 29 attached townhouses and 48 condominiums on the tract in the Boulevard Heights Neighborhood.


Has anyone seen renderings for the revised development? I haven't seen anything since the renderings of the old Lawless proposal were released.



Thank God that plan was squashed- a gated community full of garden-style apartment/condo buildings would've been dreadful. It's bad enough that Loughborough Commons is rising nearby- if this area gets any more suburban-style crap it'll begin to look like Oakville. :roll:



Since I've seen no renderings and I've heard no details about the design of the homes, I wonder how the single-family and attached homes will look. I hope and pray that these homes don't have front-loading garages, as they would defnitely clash with the intact row of gingerbreads and bungalows along Blow Avenue- on this property's northern edge.



I can't take a position on the issue of condo parking just yet. I'm inclined to agree with the alderman about underground parking, but again its design shouldn't be a compromise IMHO.



I'm excited to see new development here- and I think there's strong demand for new move-up housing in the immediate area. Still, I hope this isn't another case of an alderman endorsing a sub-par design simply to bring development to his ward. Saint Louis has reached a point where we must start demanding more of developers- and our leaders. It's time to stop settling for uninspired suburban designs plopped in the middle of our city- I think we deserve better. Hopefully this plan takes my concerns into account...I guess we'll have to wait and see!

2,327
Life MemberLife Member
2,327

PostMar 09, 2006#8

ThreeOneFour,



I live in Carondelet too. Yes, I'm concerned about the Commons and this development. But I'm really mixed. Now for the diatribe...



I'm at a point where I love to see development?almost any developement in this area. Even if it looks like 'Oakville' that would be a vast improvement over most of the trashy bungelows with green fiber-glass awnings, chain-link fenced yards full of faded, water-logged Little Tikes vehicles and bass boats covered in blue tarps. And to think all that overlooks I-55, the Astaris Plant and 'River Despair' generously fortified with MSD's 'Atlantic Wall' gun empacements.



Who'd live there for $180,000+? Forget about gating it! Build a three-story wall so you don't have to look at everything around you.



Sorry, I know I sound like a snob but parts of that neighborhood (espcially near the freeway) are an absolute eyesore and, like the developer I'm concerned about people investing 180,000+.



My wife wishes they level the whole area and start over. Half the time I agree with her.



In conclusion, we're asking developers and investor to fix a problem the city and highway planners let get out of control 50 years ago. It is what it is and there is not enough demand to warrant top-of-the-line redevelopment.

218
Junior MemberJunior Member
218

PostMar 09, 2006#9

^Sounds like you need to move. I live near the area and have exactly the opposite opinion.

1,044
Expert MemberExpert Member
1,044

PostMar 09, 2006#10

I live in Carondelet and also feel like Boulevard Heights is an area of tremendous unmet potential. Especially now that this area is getting connected to the ever expanding trail system, it would make a great location for updated housing. Most people don't find post WW II housing developments attractive. Homes are too small and lack the architectural character needed to make them potential renovation or remodeling candidates.

2,327
Life MemberLife Member
2,327

PostMar 09, 2006#11

Cityboy wrote:^Sounds like you need to move. I live near the area and have exactly the opposite opinion.


Well that's not as nasty of a reply as I was expecting.





And I'm refering to a small area (and neighboring River Des Peres which is an eyesore and you can't convince me otherwise?unless Great Rivers spends another $12 million)



Holly Hills and Carondelet/Bellerive Neighborhood are nice areas and there are spots have incredible potential. That's I moved there. But I don't see rehabbers, developers and businesses rushing in.

6,662
AdministratorAdministrator
6,662

PostApr 10, 2006#12

An update from "Mayor Slay's" Blog


A Nabe Changes





A torrid market for City real estate and changing demographics pose a challenge for some current residents: staying in the old neighborhood after you?ve out-grown your current home can be tough.



Here?s one solution:



Vatterott, Rowles Homes, and Greater Missouri Builders are moving forward with their plans to develop the ex-SLPS nursery site in Ald. Fred Heitert?s 12th Ward into 125 new single-family homes, townhouses, and condominiums. These plans, which include a significant number of homes, are a big improvement over the development plan originally proposed by Lawless Homes, which emphasized condos, rather than single-families.



The new homes, two blocks from Carondelet Park, will provide opportunities for growing families to remain in this attractive neighborhood, while the senior condos with underground parking will provide opportunities for empty nesters to remain in their beloved Immaculate Heart of Mary parish without the burdens of snow shoveling, grass cutting and gutter cleaning.



Meanwhile, the City?s development staff continues to schedule meetings with groups of prospective applicants for the Healthy Home Repair Program. The program offers a mix of grants and loans for home maintenance and essential repairs to residents willing to invest time in learning home ownership skills and financial management. In addition to emphasizing remediation of housing maintenance code violations, the program also teaches residents about the importance of making existing homes lead safe.


Nothing about how accessible it will be, but it doesn't sound like it will be gated anymore. The designs will probably improve a little with Vatterot involved. It is probably nothing special to marvel at, but it sounds improved at least.

34
New MemberNew Member
34

PostApr 11, 2006#13

Southcitygentsaid:



"Homes are too small and lack the architectural character needed to make them potential renovation or remodeling candidates."



I was born and spent the first seven years of my life in Morganford Heights, the development built in the late 40's encompassing Sunshine, Stein, Koeln and Parkwood Avenues, west of Morganford. It was a great neighborhood to grow up in, what with bigs yards to play in and schools, parks and shopping all within walking distance, but still being in the city. I was really sad when my parents sold and we moved to South County, but the houses were very tiny and and my growing family needed more room.



I was in St. Louis a couple of months ago, and drove through the old neighborhood. The house across the street from my family's was empty so I peeked in the windows. I was amazed at how small these places were and can't imagine how my family of five managed to live there, and we were one of the smallest families in the neighborhood. Some people were raising five and six kids in these cracker boxes. And as southcitygent stated, they're not easily adaptable to modern times either. Yet last time I looked last summer, they were listing for 149K. (I think my parents paid less than 10K when they were built).

1,282
AdministratorAdministrator
1,282

PostApr 19, 2006#14

Plans for 125-home development move forward

Jim Merkel

Of the Suburban Journals

South Side Journal

04/19/2006



With questions about parking resolved, plans are moving ahead for a 125-home development on 11 acres south of Carondelet Park.



Alderman Fred Heitert, R-12th Ward, plans to introduce legislation at the April 28 St. Louis Board of Aldermen meeting that would allow the development.



The legislation is expected to be heard May 17 by the Board of Aldermen's Housing, Urban Development and Zoning Committee.



Plans by Charles E. Vatterott Construction Co., Rolwes Homes, Inc. and Greater Missouri Builders call for 44 single-family homes, 48 condominiums and 33 attached townhouses.

The property faces Robert Avenue, Field Avenue, Blow Street and the back yards of homes facing Coronado Avenue. It once was the site of a nursery owned by the St. Louis Board of Education.



The current plans call for eight more homes than originally envisioned. There are four more single-family homes and four more townhouses.



One major problem that has been solved deals with parking for the two 24-unit condominium buildings that will be built on the inside of the development.



The developers wanted to put the parking in separate buildings as a way to keep costs down. But Heitert and neighborhood leaders wanted parking in the basements.



"Now they have agreed to put in underground parking for both the condominium buildings," Heitert said



Read More

1,054
Expert MemberExpert Member
1,054

PostApr 19, 2006#15

Good job residents!



By pushing developers to have underground garages the neighborhood gained more density and more people who will move in with possibly higher than the neighborhood's median income backgrounds. More money = more services

10K
AdministratorAdministrator
10K

PostMay 10, 2006#16

Alderman expects OK for 125-home project near Carondelet Park

Jim Merkel

Of the Suburban Journals

South Side Journal

05/10/2006



Alderman Fred Heitert expects easy passage of a bill allowing construction of a 125-home development on 11 acres south of Carondelet Park.



Heitert, R-12th Ward, introduced legislation in the Board of Aldermen April 28 calling for the creation of the Boulevard Heights Homes Planned Unit Development.



The aldermanic Housing, Urban Development and Zoning Committee will hold a hearing on the project at 10 a.m. May 17 in Room 208 of City Hall. Heitert said he expected the bill would pass out of the HUDZ committee easily and that the Board of Aldermen would finally pass it May 26 or June 2.


Article

1,282
AdministratorAdministrator
1,282

PostSep 13, 2006#17

Boulevard Heights project to start soon

Jim Merkel

Of the Suburban Journals

South Side Journal

09/13/2006



Construction on a 125-unit residential development south of Carondelet Park should start soon, after a city commission gave its final approval last week.



The St. Louis Planning Commission Sept. 6 approved the development plan for Boulevard Heights Homes, located in all but the western edge of the block bounded by Blow Street and Field, Robert and Coronado avenues.



In doing so, the Planning Commission agreed that the development plan is in conformity with the sketch plan it approved before the Board of Aldermen OKed the project.



Larry Rolwes, president of Rolwes Homes, Inc., said the project should start early this fall. The first display homes should be ready in early spring



The development will include a mix of single family, attached townhouses and condominiums. Approval comes after numerous meetings between the developer and Alderman Fred Heitert, R-12th Ward, who represents the area, the mayor's office and others.



"I'm just happy it's moving forward," Heitert said. "I think it's going to be great."



Rolwes Homes and C.F. Vatterott Inc. are developers in a joint venture called Boulevard Heights Development LLC. The two firms or affiliated companies will build the townhouses and single family detached homes.



A third firm, Greater Missouri Buildings, will build the condominiums.



There will be 33 single family detached homes with rear garages served by new alleys, facing Blow, Field and Robert. There already are homes facing Coronado. Most of the new homes are on lots exceeding 4,000 square feet,



Read More

10K
AdministratorAdministrator
10K

PostSep 13, 2006#18

Good job by Ald. Heitert and the Planning Commission in getting the developers to commit to basement parking.

5,433
Super ModeratorSuper Moderator
5,433

PostSep 15, 2006#19

^ I'm glad to see that as well. All this time has passed, though, and I still have yet to see a rendering of what's being offered.

1,282
AdministratorAdministrator
1,282

PostDec 27, 2006#20

Development near Carondelet Park will target younger families

By Tim O'Neil

ST. LOUIS POST-DISPATCH

12/27/2006



Not a dime in tax subsidies, and bigger houses to keep younger families in the city.



That's the brief summary on a 125-unit housing development under way on the 12 acres of a former gardening nursery in St. Louis. City officials say it's the first major development to go forward without property-tax breaks in decades. The plan for its 44 houses, some with four bedrooms and 2,600 square feet of living space, are designed to compete with the size standards of newer suburbs.



The development will be called Boulevard Heights, taking the official name of the neighborhood of tidy but small houses that adjoin the property, which is two blocks south of Carondelet Park. The rare opportunity to build on a large, open tract in the city was possible because the St. Louis Public Schools sold the land upon which it once grew trees and shrubs for school front lawns.



Work is to begin in January on the first house. When completed, the development also will have 33 townhouses and 44 condominiums. The houses will be priced from about $300,000, the townhouses from $225,000 and the condos from $175,000.



Alderman Fred Heitert, R-12th Ward, called the project "a tremendous boost to the neighborhood."



"This will let more people stay," Heitert said. "If you want to get rid of maintenance work, you can move into a condo or townhouse. If your family is getting bigger and your kids go to the local school, you can buy a bigger house and not have to move out."



That's music to Pam Brown, principal of Immaculate Heart of Mary School, a Catholic grade school four blocks west. Because so many of the area's houses are small, having been built in the years shortly before and after World War II, families with children in the school often move to the suburbs after they have a second or third child, she said. That trend has contributed to a decline in enrollment from about 300 five years ago to 230 this year, Brown said.



"Families move to the county to get the bigger house," she said. "We hope these new homes bring us more students."



Read More

502
Senior MemberSenior Member
502

PostDec 27, 2006#21

From the Rolwes - Boulevard Heights Web Site:




1,054
Expert MemberExpert Member
1,054

PostDec 27, 2006#22

Hmmm. examination



It appears that nearly the entire site is built on. No yards. At least it is dense without street fronting driveways. Glad to see rear garages, and street frontage. I guess the greenspace factor is made up in walking proximity to Carondelet Park.



Two good things, there is an east-west and north-south pedestrian cut-throughs. The north-south one converges with the parking lot where the east-west one is nearly separated and includes two commonspace sections.



I'm surprised this is only 10.4units to the acre when it could be higher density with more commonspace of higher quality.

516
Senior MemberSenior Member
516

PostDec 28, 2006#23

While I am glad to see some of the urban elements you mentioned like rear garages, I almost wonder if it is too dense, especially compared to the existing neighborhood. I think this would have been a perfect area to build something more appealing to families--which would have included either a yard or at least single family homes actually fronting green/common space. Despite being in the city, it isn't exactly near the city center and probably has more in common with an older inner ring suburb (I believe Carondelet used to be an independent village at one point)

10K
AdministratorAdministrator
10K

PostDec 28, 2006#24

What streets border this development?

2,005
Life MemberLife Member
2,005

PostDec 28, 2006#25

Here is an aerial of the proposed project, it's located about a half mile west of I-55 and a couple blocks south of Loughborough.




Read more posts (21 remaining)