2,005
Life MemberLife Member
2,005

PostFeb 25, 2009#201

^that's Memorial Drive, $3.8 million was already programmed for it so it's not really a big increase.



Here's a link to the recommended projects for the local governments/etc. in the St. Louis area:



http://www.ewgateway.org/pdffiles/libra ... ojList.pdf



maps of submittted project locations here:



http://www.ewgateway.org/Infrastructure ... ureapp.htm

3,541
Life MemberLife Member
3,541

PostFeb 25, 2009#202

Here are the projects the EWG submitted for the WHOLE city of St. Louis. Obviously you see that the distressed area got first pickings :roll: All the rest of our projects got canned, because of funding constraints.



8098 St. Louis City EWGCOG Great Streets Engineering - South Grand $890,000 890,000 $890,000



8640 St. Louis City St. Louis Compton Ave Viaduct Repairs -- Over Union Pacific

Railroad

$750,000 750,000 $1,640,000



8637 St. Louis City Southwest Garden

Neighborhood Assn.

Vandeventer Ave Streetscape -- Kingshighway To Shaw;

Segment Of Accomac

$778,363 778,363 $2,418,363



8641 St. Louis City St. Louis Dr. Martin Luther King Pedestrian Lighting --

Kingshighway West To City Limits

$1,200,000 1,200,000 $3,618,363



8168 St. Louis City St. Louis North Sarah Street (Belle To Page) -- Belle To Page Ave $1,250,000 1,250,000 $4,868,363



8111 St. Louis City St. Louis Loughborough Ave -- Over Up RR $631,032 1,275,000 $5,499,395



8643 St. Louis City St. Louis Manchester Ave Pedestrian Lighting -- Taylor To Sarah $1,450,000 1,450,000 $6,949,395



8080 St. Louis City St. Louis Overlay And Pedestrian Improvements 'A' -- Skinker-

Clayton To Page;Goodfellow-Delmar To Natural Brg

$2,575,000 2,575,000 $9,524,395



8636 St. Louis City South Grand CID South Grand Improvements -- Arsenal To McDonald $1,800,000 1,800,000 $11,324,395



8425 St. Louis City St. Louis Morgan Ford Rd - Signal

Interconnection/Upgrade --

Arsenal Street To The City Limits

$2,450,000 2,450,000 $13,774,395



8605 St. Louis City Grand Center, Inc. Grand Center/Grand Blvd

Streetscape -- Lindell To Page

Ave

$2,000,000 2,000,000 $15,774,395



8607 St. Louis City St. Louis S. Broadway Streetscape -- Courtois To Upton Street $1,500,000 1,500,000 $17,274,395



8164 St. Louis City St. Louis Carrie Avenue -- North Broadway Street To Hall Street $2,800,000 2,800,000 $20,074,395

1,099
Expert MemberExpert Member
1,099

PostFeb 26, 2009#203

By far the largest federal appropriation in the St. Louis metro area, at $75 million of which $20 million is from the feds, goes to new highway construction for MO-141 north of Olive. The next most expensive project does not even exceed $3 million.



Are we sure MoDOT has its priorities straight?

Code: Select all

                                                                            Total         2010

8048-09 ST. LOUIS COUNTY           ARRA  New 4-lane Expressway  PE             $0           $0 

MARYLAND HTS EXPRESSWAY CONNECTOR        Auxiliary Lane         ROW    $2,000,000   $2,000,000 

PAGE (MO 364) TO OLIVE (MO 340)          Widening 2 to 4 lanes  IMPL  $73,000,000  $73,000,000 

CONSTRUCT/COMPLETE 4 LN FREEWAY 

LENGTH (mi):      2.5                    Federal: $20,000,000   TOTAL $75,000,000  $75,000,000 

AIR QUALITY STAT:                        State:            $0 

PROJ PURPOSE:     Congestion             Local:   $55,000,000

3,541
Life MemberLife Member
3,541

PostFeb 26, 2009#204

http://www.mayorslay.com/news/display.asp?prID=1052



Projects that got approved for funding ($20 million worth) from the MPO (Metropolitan Planning Organization) That's a large share considering how much money was to be handed out. I do remember an interview where the head of EWG thought that it was absolutely ridiculous that MODOT could only find one project for the whole city of St. Louis. Maybe EWG and MPO actually read the clause about distressed areas.



# Compton Bridge Repairs over UP--$750,000

# Vandeventer Streetscape--Shaw to Kingshighway--$778,363

# Dr. Martin Luther King Pedestrian Lighting--Arlington west to City Limits--$1,200,000

# North Sarah Street Streetscape--West Belle to Page--$1,250,000

# Loughborough Bridge widening over UP--$631,032

# Manchester Avenue Pedestrian Lighting--Taylor to Sarah--$1,450,000

# Overlay and Pedestrian Improvements: Skinker--Clayton to Page; Goodfellow--Delmar to Natural Bridge--$2,575,000

# South Grand "Great Streets"--Arsenal to McDonald--$2,690,000

# Morganford Traffic Signal Interconnects--Arsenal south to City Limits--$2,450,000

# Grand Avenue Streetscape--Lindell to Page--$2,000,000

# S. Broadway Streetscape--Upton to Courtois--$1,500,000

Carrie Avenue Improvements--N. Broadway to Hall Street--$2,800,000

PostFeb 26, 2009#205


2,929
Life MemberLife Member
2,929

PostFeb 26, 2009#206

goat314 wrote:Slay explains MoDots error: http://www.mayorslay.com/desk/display.asp?deskID=1204


My hope is that the half being spent now, for the 120-day-ready projects, will focus on the rurality of MO, and that the remaining half to be disbursed later this year will be focused on the Metro StL Area. If this is the plan, then we'll still get the necessary & deservant construction funding for the City and County, and we'll do so without overwhelming the local roads as 64/40 is being completed.



However, if MODOT just doesn't want to fund Metro StL Area projects with the ARRA funding, then it's most likely illegal for being in contravention to the statutory elements for receipt of the Federal funds. In which case, bring on the lawyers.

5,704
Life MemberLife Member
5,704

PostFeb 26, 2009#207

I would think two Senators have some explaining to do. Want to take a guess on who will say what?

7,803
Life MemberLife Member
7,803

PostFeb 26, 2009#208

What about fixing Tucker from Washington Ave to the north?

3,541
Life MemberLife Member
3,541

PostFeb 26, 2009#209


PostFeb 28, 2009#210


2,005
Life MemberLife Member
2,005

PostMar 02, 2009#211

An incredibly thoughtful editorial from the P-D
Stimulus reaction on transportation funding highlights regional failings



03/02/2009



Federal stimulus funds heading this way for road and bridge projects will create work and inject cash into the local economy. Crumbling infrastructure will receive long-overdue attention. And, before long, projects should start generating visible evidence of improvements, providing an uplifting contrast to dreary economic conditions.



All of this is exciting. But political reaction to the transportation funding also has been a disappointment — mainly in that it reaffirms a lack of cohesive leadership devoted to regional planning and the near complete absence of a coherent, big-picture transportation policy.



Big opportunities could be lost. Serious money has become available to help St. Louis build a bridge to future economic stability and growth. But, for now, that enterprise is mired in the dead-end politics of the past — in particular, the fractious nature of local governance.


Read Full Editorial

11K
Life MemberLife Member
11K

PostMar 03, 2009#212

That makes sense and I wish that this would be the tip of the iceberg for the P-D. Heck, a few months of such clear thinking could find me a . . . subscriber of all things. This region needs a voice of reason - desperately.

3,541
Life MemberLife Member
3,541

PostMar 03, 2009#213

^ great article.

PostMar 03, 2009#214

http://www.stltoday.com/stltoday/news/s ... enDocument





Thank You Route 141 for taking more than half of the MoDot funds for our region!



I know many of us are upset about who the way MoDot funds are being assigned. Just remember that the final lists are sent to the Feds for review and I can tell you already that MoDot gave no consideration to that distressed areas clause. If so they city would have gotten first dibs on the money.

5,704
Life MemberLife Member
5,704

PostMar 04, 2009#215

Goat314, I wouldn't be surprised if nothing changes. I work for a hubzone qualified business (We essentially get preferentially treatment on Federal Contracts because our office is in and a percentage of our employees live in a distressed area). You would be surprised by a large number of distressed rural areas.

12K
Life MemberLife Member
12K

PostMar 04, 2009#216

We're certainly not alone in missing out on "our fair share" of the funds. Here's an interesting article describing how other states are dividing their transportation funds.



Example: Washington State is getting $341 million.

Seattle's share: Zero.



Check it out:



http://www.nytimes.com/2009/03/04/us/04 ... ss&emc=rss

2,005
Life MemberLife Member
2,005

PostMar 04, 2009#217

dweebe wrote:What about fixing Tucker from Washington Ave to the north?


that will have to be fixed prior to the new MRB. I think that won't be an issue, shortly.

3,541
Life MemberLife Member
3,541

PostMar 04, 2009#218

More projects announced.

Mostly rural....none in St. Louis City.



http://www.stltoday.com/stltoday/news/s ... enDocument

2,005
Life MemberLife Member
2,005

PostMar 04, 2009#219

^The state has to have 50% of its stimulus projects ready for bids within 120 days(beginning of July). These projects likely have a shorter timeframe to complete design and will be able to make that deadline. The other half has a year to complete design and be ready to bid by March 2, 2010. Hopefully, we see at least one additional City project in that mix.

3,541
Life MemberLife Member
3,541

PostMar 04, 2009#220


PostMar 05, 2009#221


PostMar 05, 2009#222


2,005
Life MemberLife Member
2,005

PostMar 10, 2009#223

It looks like some of the funding levels have shifted and the City will get more money after all. Tucker and some port improvements have been added to the list. More info will likely be available at the meeting tonight at 6:00.



http://www.modot.mo.gov/stlouis/news_an ... wsId=28180

995
Super MemberSuper Member
995

PostMar 10, 2009#224

Mayor Slay (on mayorslay.com) talks about an additional $17 million -- and the region's continuing objection.



http://www.mayorslay.com/desk/display.asp?deskID=1210

1,099
Expert MemberExpert Member
1,099

PostMar 11, 2009#225

publiceye wrote:Mayor Slay (on mayorslay.com) talks about an additional $17 million -- and the region's continuing objection.



http://www.mayorslay.com/desk/display.asp?deskID=1210
He's got a point, particularly when 62% of the St. Louis metro allocation goes to only 2 projects: $43 million for an extension of Page Ave. and $65 of $130 million for MO-141 from I-64 to Page.



Further, I'm curious as to which projects MoDOT classifies as being in economically depressed areas.

Read more posts (24 remaining)