jdstl1977 wrote:STLgasm wrote:jdstl1977 wrote:
IKEA doesn't care about how big your city is. The PLANET is their playground. They care about proximity to metropolitan areas, their trade areas are 100s of miles, (Charlotte has twice the population of St. Louis City, btw and is within a 13 county combined statistical area) and population growth (ours is at a near standstill). And, yes, we're too close to Chicago.
City population doesn't mean jack. The St. Louis metro is nearly twice the size of Charlotte.
Cincinnati also has an IKEA.
I already said IKEA doesn't care how big a city is. It's about metro areas and Charlotte's 13 county metro is on a par with St. Louis' with year over year growth. We can't say the same. Our growth is relatively tepid at best.
Also, look at Cincinnati on a map. It's nestled among several sizable metro areas. Not a close comparison.
IKEA knows St. Louisans will drive up to Bolingbrook. With the Joliet distribution center, a new IKEA will most likely go into a KC suburb.
I'm not buying this whole Chicago is to close thing. I think St. Louis, with a metro are of nearly 3 million people can handle an Ikea. If Chicago is to close to St. Louis for an Ikea store like you say, then what about these situations?
Los Angeles and San Diego both have Ikeas, with the distance only being a 1 hour drive.
Washington D.C. has 2 Ikeas, but Baltimore also has one.
Austin which is only a 3 hour drive from the already established Houston store, recently got an Ikea.
And Tampa is about to open an Ikea, even though it is only 1.5 hours away from the just opened Orlando Ikea.
Charlotte, as you mentioned above is getting an Ikea, even though Atlanta, which is only 4 hours away has one already.
All of situations above are either shorter, or just equal distance of St. Louis from Chicago. I really think this Chicago is too close to St. Louis to have their own Ikea is a crock, and I don't buy it.