If I were the CID I would spend almost all my energy on fostering a strong and very focused business and visitor core. An area even smaller than the extent of the current CID. I would try to build around short walking and transit system headways/travel times that already exist so the entire core would really be able to function as "one place"..... Perhaps each of the Metro Link Stations from the Civic Center to 6th and Washington and locations one can walk to/from those stations within 5 minutes....I would concentrate my investments and energies in that area at, least for awhile, until it has a take off which seems sustainable....Could be a decade or more... I would try to strengthen the sense/experience of the "place" being one interactive and pleasurable "place" to work and play.... Perhaps, work with Metro to create a downtown reduced fare zone for travel only among the four stations with tickets wholesaled by Metro to businesses within the "place". Those businesses would sell or comp the tickets to patrons and employees. Perhaps, focus most of my investments to improve walking/biking/streetscapes within the "place". And, I would probably focus my marketing efforts to be about "the place".roger wyoming II wrote:^^ Can you be more specific on what you're disagreeing on? I really don't have strong opinions on how far downtown collaboration should go and can see pros and cons, but I think it is certainly interesting food for thought.
In general I think we have the CBD as a distinct area and then sort of a long stretch of Downtown West to Midtown and Cortex where there are many commonalities... hopefully the districts will eventually blend all together. And one thing I hope there will be a shared goal is making Saint Louis Streetcar a reality.
One way to try go about it anyway.. Maybe there are others that work better.

