542
Senior MemberSenior Member
542

PostApr 16, 2009#276

We already have transit that connects the Loop, the north End of Euclid by Trinity Episcopal, and Grand Center. It's called the 97 bus. It works quite well--I've used it to return from the Symphony when the schedule falls right, and from downtown when the train is super-crowded for a big event.



(Yes, yes, I know, I pointed this out like a year ago. The responses were that "white people won't ride the bus" and "people on the bus are stinky" or words to that effect).



My main hope for this silly trolley is that it revives business on the north end of DeB, like where that dead Hardware store is. Unfortunately, massive surface parking lots take up a lot of the frontage.

432
Full MemberFull Member
432

PostApr 16, 2009#277

Moorlander wrote:When this becomes a suceess it will be a spring board for more urban street car lines. The problem is, everyone will say "they did this with private money, blah blah blah"


Conversely, if it fails, it will be the poster child for keeping street car lines from being installed where they could actually be useful.



It will provide lots of great fodder, like "they're just for tourists," "they can't negotiate traffic," and "they're too slow." While they may be fallacious arguments, opponents can just point to an illustrative example on Delmar and say they told you so.



I just can't see how we can say "well, the first streetcar we built really sucks for getting around, but the next one will be great." Build a great one first, one that gets people to work and school, not just a touristy photo-op.

10K
AdministratorAdministrator
10K

PostApr 16, 2009#278

Wabash wrote:
...then expand it east to Euclid, spurring development along the line. Maybe then find a way to get it to Grand Center.


I agree couldn't agree more. Loop, CWE, and Midtown should be connected.



One issue with initial expansion is that there is little opportunity for development between the History Museum and Euclid. It's all Forest Park on one side and 1904 palaces on the other. It would make for a beautiful ride, but unfortunately not much development potential.


I was thinking more of using Delmar to connect the Loop with the CWE and GC. The blocks of Delmar from DeBaliviere to Vandeventer are largely pretty bad, and a streetcar line could possibly help bring about new development.

3,544
Life MemberLife Member
3,544

PostApr 16, 2009#279

Everyone is being very pessimistic about this project.

Whether it serves a real transportation purpose is irrelevant, this trolley will be a success and further solidify the Loop as a top St. Louis destination (all while sparking more urban development on Delmar and adjacent streets).

I think people need to stop looking at this as a serious attempt at a transit project, but instead a serious attempt at furthering the development of a very popular urban area.

If this becomes a big success (which I believe it will, just because of its development potential and novelty) other areas will seriously start looking at trolleys as a means to redevelop and stabilize areas like Soulard, Benton Park, Grand Center, Downtown etc.



We could potentially look at this as dipping your feet in the water, before jumping in to the pool. You know jumping in wont hurt, but sometimes you need to see someone else test the water first.

542
Senior MemberSenior Member
542

PostApr 16, 2009#280

goat314 wrote:Everyone is being very pessimistic about this project.

Whether it serves a real transportation purpose is irrelevant, this trolley will be a success and further solidify the Loop as a top St. Louis destination (all while sparking more urban development on Delmar and adjacent streets).

I think people need to stop looking at this as a serious attempt at a transit project, but instead a serious attempt at furthering the development of a very popular urban area.

If this becomes a big success (which I believe it will, just because of its development potential and novelty) other areas will seriously start looking at trolleys as a means to redevelop and stabilize areas like Soulard, Benton Park, Grand Center, Downtown etc.



We could potentially look at this as dipping your feet in the water, before jumping in to the pool. You know jumping in wont hurt, but sometimes you need to see someone else test the water first.


Given that I live about 40 paces from DeBaliviere, I'm wondering if this thing could have a positive effect on the value of my condo.

11K
Life MemberLife Member
11K

PostApr 16, 2009#281

Does anyone care to answer who the common rider will be on the trolley? What purpose will the trolley serve to area residents?

3,766
Life MemberLife Member
3,766

PostApr 16, 2009#282

Does anyone care to answer who the common rider will be on the trolley? What purpose will the trolley serve to area residents?


You should direct that question to Mr. Edward's via his group's website.



I still think this project will open eyes to street cars and open minds to future expansion of this kind of transportation.

11K
Life MemberLife Member
11K

PostApr 16, 2009#283

I do get your point, but does it make sense to have a Soulard Trolley that one needs to buy a special ticket for, a Grand Center Trolley that one needs to buy a special ticket for, a Loop Trolley that one needs to buy a special ticket for . . . .



We seem to forget that trolleys, streetcars, etc. only ever made sense because local residents use them. Having several 2-3mile antique trolleys in town does not make sense.

8,908
Life MemberLife Member
8,908

PostApr 16, 2009#284

Who said future lines wouldn't be under the metro umbrella? You do make fine pts regarding the redundancy of this .

3,766
Life MemberLife Member
3,766

PostApr 16, 2009#285

^I agree, we could question the actual need for these modes of tranportation all day, but in the end, it is more of an attraction versus a viable mode of transportation. I would love to have Metrolink at street level. That would take the locals where they need to go. Unfortunately, the trollys are less viable for that purpose. If they had a route that hit all of the major attractions some day, it would make sense. If it went where Metro does not. I wish they would have never removed them. I love riding them in New Orleans and the street cars in SF. That is so cool!



Unfortunately for detractors and doubters, Joe Edwards is a powerful, ingenious man. He is dead set on getting this done, so I think it will eventually happen, regardless of who is for or against it. I have to support any project of his, based on his track record alone.

308
Full MemberFull Member
308

PostApr 16, 2009#286

throatybeard wrote:
goat314 wrote:Everyone is being very pessimistic about this project.

Whether it serves a real transportation purpose is irrelevant, this trolley will be a success and further solidify the Loop as a top St. Louis destination (all while sparking more urban development on Delmar and adjacent streets).

I think people need to stop looking at this as a serious attempt at a transit project, but instead a serious attempt at furthering the development of a very popular urban area.

If this becomes a big success (which I believe it will, just because of its development potential and novelty) other areas will seriously start looking at trolleys as a means to redevelop and stabilize areas like Soulard, Benton Park, Grand Center, Downtown etc.



We could potentially look at this as dipping your feet in the water, before jumping in to the pool. You know jumping in wont hurt, but sometimes you need to see someone else test the water first.


Given that I live about 40 paces from DeBaliviere, I'm wondering if this thing could have a positive effect on the value of my condo.




I think this thought should be on EVERYONE's mind when thinking of any St. Louis issue.



What's in it for me if we vote yes on expanding metro/ merging county-city. The culmination of numerous good choices in the right direction makes the city a more attractive place to live. And then YOUR PROPERTY VALUE GOES UP.

320
Full MemberFull Member
320

PostApr 17, 2009#287

:o The Delmar Trolley project is fantastic. It doesn't involve the CWE nor should it. It's purpose to make the Loop a national destination; to extend and develop the Loop all the way to DeBaliviere; and to connect the Loop with all of the wonders of Forest Park. It's not transportation; it's an environment in motion. Fantastic I tell ya. 8)



If the CWE wants in, then they should lay claim to Delmar between Kingshighway and Union; put a 30 storey tower in the Schnucks parking lot; and maybe even rehab all of Fountain Park. [-X

2,687
Super ModeratorSuper Moderator
2,687

PostApr 17, 2009#288

Of course this is a project that should be encouraged. It empowers St. Louis identity, and it improves transportation between St. Louis and the most dense community in the area.

1,610
Totally AddictedTotally Addicted
1,610

PostApr 19, 2009#289

Except no one is building vintage trolley lines anymore. KC wants rapid streetcar, that's modern streetcar with some semi-exclusive right-of-way and maybe signal priority. Cincy and Milwaukee both want modern streetcar. Memphis wants to convert and expand its lines to modern streetcar. Portland and Seattle have secured funding to expand their lines. And Charlotte has begun laying tracks for its first line that intersects, rather than parallels its light rail line.

2,005
Life MemberLife Member
2,005

PostApr 20, 2009#290

^agreed. The Loop is able to sustain itself and is located close to MetroLink. This money would be better spent on a modern streetcar in the City. Some of the ideas posted on the design your own street car thread are pretty good.

3,311
Life MemberLife Member
3,311

PostApr 20, 2009#291

why not have streetcars on the line of ALL eras. one from the 20/30/s, 60's, and today?

549
Senior MemberSenior Member
549

PostApr 20, 2009#292

JCity wrote:why not have streetcars on the line of ALL eras. one from the 20/30/s, 60's, and today?


Good call. And that would give yet another nice way to market the transportation system nationally and certainly gives it the potential to set it apart from other urban areas.

371
Full MemberFull Member
371

PostApr 20, 2009#293

JCity wrote:why not have streetcars on the line of ALL eras. one from the 20/30/s, 60's, and today?


Portland does that on their streetcar line. On weekends, they'll pull out their historic streetcars.

1,610
Totally AddictedTotally Addicted
1,610

PostApr 20, 2009#294

This blog post tells of how our new Transportation Secretary looks to Portland as a national model, which of course is a model for its modern streetcars and catalyzed development.

11K
Life MemberLife Member
11K

PostApr 20, 2009#295

Jax wrote:
JCity wrote:why not have streetcars on the line of ALL eras. one from the 20/30/s, 60's, and today?


Portland does that on their streetcar line. On weekends, they'll pull out their historic streetcars.


Of course the Embarcadero streetcars in San Francisco do the same - cars from 18XX to 1960 or so.

3,544
Life MemberLife Member
3,544

PostApr 20, 2009#296

I think St. Louis needs a streetcar system that treats the lambert line as a spine. With individual extensions breaking off from the North and South.

11K
Life MemberLife Member
11K

PostApr 20, 2009#297

I've been looking more and more at BRT systems and I think they probably make a lot of sense for St. Louis. I'm in Cleveland later this week and hope to ride their new Euclid Corridor line. BRT would be a great fit for Broadway, South Grand, Kingshighway, etc.

155
Junior MemberJunior Member
155

PostApr 20, 2009#298

Wabash wrote:I agree couldn't agree more. Loop, CWE, and Midtown should be connected.


But aren't they already connected by MetroLink...?

4,553
Life MemberLife Member
4,553

PostApr 20, 2009#299

^Kind of.



The Grand Metro stop is rather isolated. It isn't far, but their is a huge psychological barrier from midtown. A trolley would attract more SLU and Grand Center passengers.

The CWE stop is closer, but it is on the south end of the CWE and a bit isolated within the BJC complex. A line right down Lindell would pull from the the entire CWE, up to McPherson perhaps even Delmar.

As for the Loop.... there's no excuse there. It's well connected to Metrolink.

923
Super MemberSuper Member
923

PostApr 20, 2009#300

goat314 wrote:

Everyone is being very pessimistic about this project.

Whether it serves a real transportation purpose is irrelevant, this trolley will be a success and further solidify the Loop as a top St. Louis destination (all while sparking more urban development on Delmar and adjacent streets).

I think people need to stop looking at this as a serious attempt at a transit project, but instead a serious attempt at furthering the development of a very popular urban area.

If this becomes a big success (which I believe it will, just because of its development potential and novelty) other areas will seriously start looking at trolleys as a means to redevelop and stabilize areas like Soulard, Benton Park, Grand Center, Downtown etc.


This is known as the "ostrich" approach to planning/development. If some private developer wants to spend hundreds of millions of dollars to dig up Delmar and put down a street car line, that's their perogative. However, the second you start using PUBLIC MONEY, you absolutely have to look at the fiscal feasibility of the project. This isn't some beautification project. No one's talking about planting trees or changing sidewalk pavements, they're talking about hundreds of millions of dollars for what amounts to a glorified moving walkway.



If you consider the length of the loop from City Hall to the Metrolink Station, that's a distance of 1.1 miles, approximately a 20 minute walk from end to end. If you want to consider a future loop extends to Debalievere, then it becomes 1.6 miles - about a 30 minute walk. I ask - who would use the trolley? If it's free and the weather is lousy, some people would. If it's a nice day and costs money, no one will use it. What's the point? The walk from the station isn't oppressive, and even if people felt it was, there's bus connections that run right down delmar.



There's a perfect example of this at a place I just recently visited in LA called the Grove. It's a massive shopping complex with a farmer's market/food court, and it has a trolley. It runs the length of the development, carrying families and tourists. It's nice, looks gimmicky, and it is. I dont' know if it costs anything to ride, but it looks like old people and young families were enjoying the novelty of it. Again though - this is a private development. Public money (to my knowledge) wasn't used to build it.



You absolutely have to do a cost/benefit analysis of this thing when using public money. Are the potential improvements in property value/increased developments going to outweigh the massive costs of the project? What about the opportunity costs? Are the hundreds of millions needed to build this thing better spent on, oh, I dunno - SCHOOLS? Streetscape improvements? Branding initiatives, etc.



If Joe Edwards wants to come and put all his own money up for it, I say let him do what he wants, it's his money. The second they start asking for public financing, due dilligence is a necessity.

Read more posts (2046 remaining)