2,327
Life MemberLife Member
2,327

PostNov 08, 2006#76

I agree with marko and deb (same with Adam Sandler movies as well!)



My only concern -- it seems there's no room for street trees (...and I love street trees!)

516
Senior MemberSenior Member
516

PostNov 08, 2006#77

I think there's room for street trees. I think the construction fencing is hiding 4-5 feet of extra depth from the street. I hope they redo the sidewalk complete with trees, rather than putting in a small strip of sod.

2,327
Life MemberLife Member
2,327

PostNov 08, 2006#78

South Compton wrote:I hope they redo the sidewalk complete with trees, rather than putting in a small strip of sod.


Or worse--after the sod dies cover over it with asphalt and paint it green.

502
Senior MemberSenior Member
502

PostNov 09, 2006#79

Here are some more photos to facilitate discussion:



Please note the security sign in lower center.







Looking South:







Looking Southeast:







Looking Northwest:







Enjoy!

11K
Life MemberLife Member
11K

PostNov 09, 2006#80

I love the real balconies on the street side. This fits great with the rest of South Grand!!!

12K
Life MemberLife Member
12K

PostNov 10, 2006#81

Regarding the building line: I don't really have a preferance of close to the street vs set back from the street; I just think it should be consistent.

3,785
Life MemberLife Member
3,785

PostNov 10, 2006#82

It is nice to see that South Grand is getting some newer, high end residential. Good urban design and nice looking architecture. The website could be a bit more "flashy" though.

41
New MemberNew Member
41

PostDec 11, 2006#83

That block certainly looks different, in a great way. The construction's buzzing along now.

516
Senior MemberSenior Member
516

PostDec 11, 2006#84

Some of the brick is already going up now too.

205
Junior MemberJunior Member
205

PostDec 11, 2006#85

If Grand had better mass transit infrastructure in place, these neighborhoods would really blow up (in a good way!)



All I want for Christmas is a streetcar line!

502
Senior MemberSenior Member
502

PostJan 03, 2007#86

Some pics;
















1,044
Expert MemberExpert Member
1,044

PostJan 03, 2007#87

I am glad that new housing is being built on a previously underused lot, however I can't help but be less than enthusiastic over their design. This development would have been better suited for a residential area and not an important commercial corridor.

1,610
Totally AddictedTotally Addicted
1,610

PostJan 03, 2007#88

This stretch of Grand between Shaw and Shenandoah is mostly residential. Plus, the added density will have more people walking along Grand to nearby commercial and parks.

12K
Life MemberLife Member
12K

PostJan 04, 2007#89

southslider wrote:This stretch of Grand between Shaw and Shenandoah is mostly residential.


I beg to differ. Other than a couple of highrise apartments to the North, it's nearly all commercial, plus some second floor residential. This would have been a great site for first floor retail/commercial, with the condos above. That could have built on the strength of South Grand, and helped link it to the medical complex to the North.

10K
AdministratorAdministrator
10K

PostJan 04, 2007#90

Now if only someone would buy and tear down the Jack in the Box next door for a smaller urban infill project.

2,327
Life MemberLife Member
2,327

PostJan 04, 2007#91

I'm still pushing to tear down the shuttered Shell station!

513
Senior MemberSenior Member
513

PostJan 04, 2007#92

Framer wrote:This would have been a great site for first floor retail/commercial, with the condos above. That could have built on the strength of South Grand, and helped link it to the medical complex to the North.
If it's any consolation the project planned for across the street in place of the old YMCA will be just this.

12K
Life MemberLife Member
12K

PostJan 05, 2007#93

stellar wrote:
Framer wrote:This would have been a great site for first floor retail/commercial, with the condos above. That could have built on the strength of South Grand, and helped link it to the medical complex to the North.
If it's any consolation the project planned for across the street in place of the old YMCA will be just this.


Yep, I'm looking forward to it. I'd also love to see something like the newly-unveiled Villas of St. Louis (the old Salad Bowl site on Lindell) built on this stretch of Grand.

1,770
Never Logs OffNever Logs Off
1,770

PostJan 05, 2007#94

What is going on with the Y tear down? It was approved but I haven't hears anything new in months. Also, I couldn't agree more, the Compton Gate development, despite its lack of ground floor commercial, is really adding nice density, and the residents should increase traffic on Grand and hopefully spur more commercial development. Maybe they'll even create a market for a NEW SHONEYS!!!

2,821
Life MemberLife Member
2,821

PostJan 08, 2007#95

^36 units? That's probably around 70 something residents at the most. I'm not sure how much "density" this project is really going to add. It will however, make a definite impact on restoring the streetscape along that section of Grand. I just wish they had gone with an architectural style other than Suburblah...



BTW, I noticed the drawings on the website show the back of the townhome portion to be covered with siding on most of all three sides. Please tell me this is not of the vinyl variety...



Does anyone on here know anyone moving into this project?

2,005
Life MemberLife Member
2,005

PostMay 30, 2007#96

Condos rise from ashes of devastating fire

$10 million project opens May 31



By Jim Merkel

Tuesday, May 22, 2007 6:01 PM CDT



Michelle Duffe never will forget April 27, 2006. Nor will she forget next Thursday, May 31.



The first date was when an arsonist set fire to the construction site of the Compton Gate Condominium development at 2201 S. Grand Blvd.



Duffe is a partner in the $10 million project to build 30 condominiums and six townhouses on the site of a closed Shoney's restaurant.



[snip]



The condominiums are in two three-story buildings of 15 units each, one along Grand and one along Cleveland Avenue. Both are above a basement garage.



The two condominium buildings, along with a six-unit townhouse building on the north yet to be built and a fence to the west will form a courtyard.



Priced at $250,000 to nearly $400,000, the condominiums will range from 1,250 square feet to 1,935 square feet. All will have two bedrooms and two bathrooms.



Construction of the townhouses should start in August or September and take about seven months to complete



Link to Article

11K
Life MemberLife Member
11K

PostMay 30, 2007#97

More good quality housing options for people to live in St. Louis City - projects like this are making the City a success again. I'm always somewhat surprised when more $400K condos go on the market, from the conventional wisdom I receive at work and from others I'd think that there was no one in the City that could afford it!

10K
AdministratorAdministrator
10K

PostMay 30, 2007#98

I'm so glad the developers were able to rebuild after the awful arson incident. The new project looks great. It really makes that Jack-in-the-Box look out of place!

11K
Life MemberLife Member
11K

PostMay 31, 2007#99

Walking by these yesterday I think they look good and definitely add some great density to this block of S. Grand - I just wish they had pushed them back a few more feet to give more room on the sidewalk. I felt like the building was pushing me out into the street.

2,953
Life MemberLife Member
2,953

PostMay 31, 2007#100

DeB,



I'm not sure I agree that it looks great. The design seems like it's awfully unfriendly to Grand, and its really not all that great to look at. Granted, I agree that it makes the Jack In The Box look out of place, but I'm just not a big fan of this building.

Read more posts (16 remaining)